Sentences with phrase «what doctor a patient»

Online ratings that review physicians — just like ratings for restaurants, movies and mechanics — can influence what doctor a patient chooses, but most patients rank insurance acceptance and convenience as more important factors, according to U-M research published Feb. 18 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Not exact matches

But what if AI and deep learning could help doctors figure out a patient's disease simply by analyzing a face — no scans or testing required?

Exposure therapy pushes patients to recount their traumas, visualize it in their imaginations and explain to the doctor what is happening as they experience the stressful scenario.

And doctors, who have little info about how patients pay for drugs, often prescribe what is seen as the latest and greatest, even if the extra benefit is small.

But follow - up appointments with doctors can be challenging — and are certainly inconvenient, since the patient has to drive (or be driven) to the doctor's office for what often amounts to a five - minute appointment.

If doctors can more accurately predict what drugs will treat someone's cancer, they can select the right drugs for the right patients.

A big part of what's driving Opdivo's success is an early decision by BMS to chase a much wider share of the cancer patient population — a decision that has meant that doctors don't have to administer a time - consuming diagnostic test to check if patients have a protein called PD - L1 before prescribing Opdivo in certain cancers.

To see what the new balance of power will look like in the coming years — and what it looks like right now — Fortune interviewed more than three dozen executives at companies across the health care continuum, along with entrepreneurs, doctors, patients, and other experts.

What doctors don't know is what effect it would have on the consciousness, memories or personalities of patients, that one day in the future, could possibly benefit from that type of procedWhat doctors don't know is what effect it would have on the consciousness, memories or personalities of patients, that one day in the future, could possibly benefit from that type of procedwhat effect it would have on the consciousness, memories or personalities of patients, that one day in the future, could possibly benefit from that type of procedure.

In the area of living individuals and genetic intervention are questions of patient responsibility and the sharing of genetic information: If a doctor could know that you will contract Huntington's disease at age 40 or Alzheimer's disease at age 60, at what age would you want to be told?

his decision to convert had nothing to do with what he found, but what he experienced as a doctor of dying patients and his investigation of different beliefs.

Case in point: For years I predicted that Oregon's assisted suicide law would not result in doctors and patients with long standing relationships working out what is best for end - of - life care.

The «Lazarus effect» is a phrase coined by doctors and relief workers in Africa to describe what happens to AIDS patients after they start receiving antiretroviral medicines.

Most serious of all is the fact that communication between doctor and patient is consistently short of what it might be.

No HL does not have there right to know what goes on between a doctor and patient... ever.

To illustrate, the statement by a trusted family doctor to an alcoholic patient, that he «is not an alcoholic but simply drinks too much and should cut down,» can petrify that man's resistance to seeing his problem for what it is.

The patient doesn't do for the doctor what the doctor does for the patient.

Every doctor knows what that means: you can tell your patient to stop smoking, eat less, get more exercise and deal with stress, but all too often the patient just is not willing to pay the price in upsetting an established lifestyle, and chooses instead to continue in self - destructive habits.

Please enlighten me as to the 16 you are talking about - And more importantly how is it any of the employer's business what prescriptions a doctor writes for a female patient?

In Ontario today, doctors who decline to euthanize their patients are required to provide what is termed, in the Orwellian vocabulary of the culture of death, an «effective referral»: They are obliged, on pain of losing their license to practice, to send a troubled patient to a doctor of lighter conscience who will kill that patient.

What were the rules after you had dragged out of the doctor the fact that only a few patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed in its late stages, like Vee's, lived more than two years, and most were gone within a year?

«Being prepared for a medical visit and knowing what questions to ask your doctor allows patients to be more hands - on in their recovery process, increasing their chances of overcoming injury,» said Dr. Montgomery.

It sucks that they don't work for everyone and I guarantee you that every nurse and doctor who was working with your friend had a lot of sympathy for her because it is absolutely no fun to see your patient in pain and to not be able to give her what she wanted.

Would it have sucked possibly, absolutely, but there is a problem when things are being done against patients wishes even if it's their best interest... this is where consent, and educating the patient is important, instead of the attitude that so many doctors have of «don't question me, I'm the doctor and I know what's best.»

Doctors offer pain relief because that's what they would want for themselves and it's what most patients want, but if a patient declines it that's fine too.

So you would be happier if doctors did not offer choices, but required all their patients to have epidurals because that's what they would want?

Beyond what textbooks teach, doctors should be willing to look over each patient's medical history - because past injuries or health concerns can impact anyone's pregnancy, not just a little person's.

In the country's 250 birth centers, midwives tend to take far more time with patients than busy doctors do and the emphasis is on the whole woman — everything from consultations on what a woman should be eating during pregnancy to conversations about anxiety over delivery.

What it illustrates is that when doctors say different things about the same thing, patients start trying to figure out why.

I think what you're saying is that doctors (and other practitioners) don't always take the time to answer patient questions, or don't answer them very well, and this can lead to patients who are frustrated or mistrustful.

The ones that take the time to tell you what they are going to do before they do it and answer questions will be known as extremely nice, considerate doctors whereas in America, Britain etc it's just expected and if they refuse to answer questions their patients think they aren't good doctors.

Doctor: I tell our patients that it is a major abdominal surgery, and it can take about two weeks to feel about 75 percent of what they normally feel, and it can take a full six to eight weeks for full recovery.

What an amazing doctor you must be for your patients Melissa.

Patient choice and control are at the heart of what we believe in and the NHS has been slow in giving patients real clout, despite the fact that many people with chronic conditions know as much about their health as their doctors do.

This means that the final decisions of what medicine patients use will now fall in the hands of the patient's doctor, and that an insurer can not override those decisions.

Finally he insisted that even though nurse, doctors and patients oppose his NHS reforms, Ed was «out of touch with what's happening in Doncaster».

On what exactly is wrong with the President, Adesina said: «Don't you know that the Hippocratic Oath even forbids a doctor from speaking about the condition of his patient except the patient authorises it?

Mischa Sogut, a spokesman for Gottfried, said the guidelines for how seriously ill a patient must be and what hoops the doctor must go through to prescribe the non-smokable marijuana will be developed through a regulatory process led by the state health commissioner.

As a patient, it could means that decisions about who provides what service in your area are made by lawyers and judges rather than doctors and nurses in the NHS.

«GP partnerships are private partnership [s], but as a patient that is not what you care about - you want a good doctor you can trust, and on the NHS, so free at the point of delivery,» the health secretary argued.

Very similar to what I was saying the other day about national health insurance... the medical / insurance complex is so full of bad apples that the only way to restrain them is with fewer patient visits and way fewer doctors.

DeepMind is not planning to automate clinical decisions — such as what treatments to give patients — but says it wants to support doctors by making predictions based on data that is too broad in scope for an individual to take in.

Overwhelmed doctors — some of whom, Lantagne says, literally had no idea what cholera was — began stacking patients two to a bed, then on the floor.

Watson looks at records from a patient, like doctors» notes and lab test results, and gives opinions about what treatment to pursue.

No doctor wants to ignore an opportunity to save a patient from infectious disease, yet much of what is prescribed is probably unnecessary — and all of it feeds the spread of resistance genes in hospitals and apparently throughout the environment.

«What we argue in our lawsuit is that the decision should be a patient's with their doctor,» says Frank Burroughs of the Abigail Alliance.

Data presented by Doctors Without Borders also suggests that when it comes to surviving Ebola it does not seem to matter what day in the course of the disease an Ebola patient shows up at the clinic in west Africa.

When patients check into a hospital, they expect doctors there to fix what ails them, but one in 20 patients seeking care at hospitals contract a health care — based infection.

The show doesn't simply provide overviews of various topics; it explores what happens behind the scenes for both doctors and patients.

The patient, of course, was miffed that she paid for lab work for the doctor to learn what she already knew.