Bynum does not claim to know exactly
what earlier understandings of bodily resurrection say to us, but she intuits that they tell us something if we have ears to hear and eyes to see.
Not exact matches
So there's been a lot of great work by NASA and other organizations in
early exploration of Mars and
understanding...
what Mars is like, where could we land,
what's the composition of the atmosphere, where is there water — water ice, I should say — and so we need to go from these
early exploration missions to actually building a city.
Acknowledge that you
understand what they want and need by making reference to the conversation or
earlier email, detailing or even better, summarizing
what they have asked for and even posing the question - «Have I
understood you correctly?»
Getting an
understanding of
what your business is worth is important to do
early in the process because this is the starting point for many decisions.
Shontell: From
what I
understand, you had a pretty awful family tragedy happen
early.
From Ashley Madison's
early days to its current international incarnation, Biderman has
understood that the service wouldn't just sell itself, which is why he pursued
what he calls a «Hollywood red - carpet» approach to PR.
Today's Boomer Consumer Businesses need to
understand today's boomers from three perspectives: 1) where they are in their heads in terms of
what drives their behavior; 2) where they are in their lives in terms of lifestyle and life stage; and 3) how their shared generational experiences coming of age in the late»50s to
early»70s shape their perceptions.
Whatever you call the firm (its post-merger name hasn't been revealed as of this writing), much of its success in
early seasons was due to creative director Draper's ability to see beyond
what clients and customers said they wanted, and
understand instead
what they truly needed.
Besides the absurd valuation (and the existential angst the valuation has apparently unleashed for some) I just never
understood something more basic:
What's the incentive or value of taking on that much VC at such an
early stage?
Anastasia Gentles, cofounder of Sugar Land, Texas - based Nightlight Pediatric Urgent Care (No. 2,306), says catching the ear of a female banker at Louisiana - based Whitney Bank who
understood the importance of
what she and her two co-founders were doing was the turning point in her business's
early days.
Get organized and discuss project objectives
early on so that you
understand what your boss wants to accomplish.
Watching this young entrepreneur go through the difficult steps to truly
understand what he wanted for himself and his ultimate company was inspiring, because he did the work
early on to better
understand what created his drive.
The BlackRock Investment Institute took some of the firm's most senior portfolio managers to Frankfurt, Berlin and Milan
earlier this month to
understand what's taking place on the ground, and whether the recovery is for real.
We will best
understand what Carl Elliott is doing, I suspect, if we think of him as reclaiming the outsider status of
early bioethicists.
Then again, it's not like you'll actually
understand what I'm saying, nor will you actually address any
earlier points.
As I read the posts here, I think the HATERS still mock them, but now are to dumb to
understand what the
early haters were meaning as they cried, «Washed and saved!»
Get»em hooked
early so they don't
understand or question
what it is they supposedly believe
As recommended
earlier, a dictionary is useful for gaining a better
understanding of
what words mean.
To
understand 1 John, we must
understanding the
early form of Gnosticism he was writing against and
what they were teaching.
What is more important, the
earlier critics did less than justice to the fact that the Bible has its own doctrine about the nature of history, which deserves to be
understood and appreciated in itself.
The
early Church struggled to
understand what God meant when he said he would return, and over time they were forced to adjust their assumptions.
It is fascinating in itself; it throws light on every portion of the Bible; it clears up obscurities, explaining
what is else inexplicable; it distinguishes the minor detours from the major highways of Biblical thought; it gives their true value to primitive concepts, the
early, blazed trails leading out to great issues; and, in the end, it makes of the Bible a coherent whole,
understood, as everything has to be
understood, in terms of its origins and growth.
Before we come to an exposition of
what early Protestants were trying to say positively with their new image, it is important to
understand precisely
what struck them as negative about the image of the Middle Ages.
The beauty of the written word in Genesis strikes me with an
understanding of
what the greatest thinkers of those
early days saw when they looked into the wonder of man and the awe in the universe around them.
Their whole analysis of decline hangs on a prescriptive or normative
understanding of church - relatedness, and that normative
understanding resembles suspiciously
what the colleges were, or at least claimed to be, sometime
earlier in the century, in perhaps some «golden age» of church - relatedness (and, unfortunately, often concomitant ethnic insularity and academic mediocrity).
This story reminded the
early church readers that not even the disciples
understood what was happening in their midst.
But we have seen that the
earlier part of the paragraph can be better
understood if we take Jesus» faithfulness to be
what discloses the justice of God.
sounds more like «corporate brainstorming», but
what I was trying to suggest is that it appears that we're witnessing (not intentionally) an evolving
understanding of
what wd become more central to the narrative and eventually orthodox.That is, if you cdn't believe it, you were out the door.A good example wd be the higher Christology that the fourth gospel reflects and more specifically, the virgin birth which it (like Mark and Paul) doesn't mention.If the birth narratives that we're familiar with are absent from the
earliest gospel and the most theological gospel that came decades later, and can only be found in the other two gospels that we know used the first, it at least suggests a growing and evolving
understanding of who Jesus «was» and «is».
Amos Wilder adds a piece to our
understanding of
what these performances might have been like: When we picture to ourselves the
early Christian narrators we should make full allowance for animated and expressive narration... oral speech also was less inhibited than today... when we think of the
early church meetings and testimonies and narrations we are probably well guided if we think of the way in which Vachael Lindsay read or of the appropriate readings of James Weldon Johnson's God's Trombones (56).
It would be to do for the modern era
what Aristotle succeeded in doing for an
earlier age — it would be to find a way, given the modern world's
understanding of nature, to do justice to human being as a part of nature so
understood.
It was appropriate, then, for
early 20th - century Social Gospel theologians like Walter Rauschenbusch to observe how prejudice and social discrimination are passed from one generation to the next, and it is consistent for theologians today to incorporate observations about social inheritance —
what liberation theologians and feminist theologians call «social location» or «systemic evil» — into our
understanding of the human condition.
Jesus
understood what it meant to pray without ceasing, and these
early mornings of prayer were a small part of His overall prayer life.
One of the striking things about the Easter and post-Easter narratives in the New Testament is that they are largely about incomprehension: which is to say that, in the canonical Gospels, the
early Church admitted that it took some time for the first Christian believers to
understand what had happened in the Resurrection, and how
what had happened changed everything.
We are now in position to see more clearly how Paul
understood the necessity of the incarnation, (This term can scarcely be avoided, but will be
understood, when applied to Paul, in the light of
what I tried to say
earlier), about which we were speaking in the preceding lecture.
If not, then we have ended up with a different version of Christianity than the one of those
early Christians, which is
what some of
understand has indeed happened.
Early in Faith and Order inquiries it became apparent that formal comparative examination of the confessional and other utterances of the churches was not adequate for a responsible
understanding either of
what these churches affirmed in common or asserted in difference.
I can
understand making the point that the people of Ferguson should be invited to forgive
what they perceived as a wrong on the part of the officer...... but for you to make the assumption and then state that the Officer's action was «wrong» (if that is
what you meant to say) is not something I can agree with, not without your full rationale (which maybe I missed from an
earlier post)....
If we want to
understand why the
earliest Christians kept the Hebrew Bible, we must know
what they meant when they said Jesus was the Christ.
Applied to the Whiteheadian notion of a society, this
understanding of Spirit illuminates
what I said
earlier about a society vis - à - vis its member actual entities.
What becomes evident then is the similarity which exists between the genetically
early forms of the
understanding of reality and the explanations of the philosophy of organism.
There may well be
earlier theological reflections on Paul's assertion that God's weakness is more powerful than
what we typically
understand as power, but I have not surfaced them.
[40] On other important aspects of Tertullian's
understanding of
what it meant to be in ecclesiological communion and the role of baptism, see Killian McDonnell, «Communion Ecclesiology and Baptism in the Spirit: Tertullian and the
Early Church,» in Theological Studies, Vol.
They were attracted to
what they saw of the faith and practices of
early Christian communities; only later did they come to
understand very much about the faith, after a prolonged program of catechesis made them proficient in an alien grammar and way of life.
In explaining his
early books of artistic photography — particularly Occupations, which contains many photos of him giving the Nazi salute against a variety of backgrounds — Kiefer offers a comment that is consistent with his expressionistic need to «fuse» himself with his subject: «I do not identify with Nero or Hitler, but I have to re-enact
what they did just a little bit in order to
understand the madness.
What took place then is to be
understood with the
earlier experience at Caesarea Philippi in mind.
It is the story of the
early leader's and follower's STRUGGLE to
understand who they were and
what they were supposed to do in the midst of the void of questions Christ left us in.
Early in my own discipleship, I was privileged to attend a class that taught one how to explore
what particular gifts one had been given and how to work within the Body by focusing on those and also
understanding how members with other giftings functioned best.
There are dangers in our phrasing here which we shall clarify later on, but it is legitimate to state that at least some things which appear without intelligibility from an
earlier perspective may in principle become intelligible within a later and wider perspective.8 If this is the case, then, it may be simply impossible for us ever to have a controlling and objectively comprehensive
understanding of
what chance really is.
@Ed
What was objectionable in your
earlier statement is that you were implying that while gravity is a known fact that is still less than 100 %
understood (hence the term «theory of gravity»), evolution is somehow controversial within biology and is called a theory for some very different reason.
We must
understand that
what we read in the book of Genesis comes from a religion and culture which is at its
early stages of growing into