Sentences with phrase «what education proposals»

It's far from certain what education proposals will pass both chambers.

Not exact matches

As we wrapped up our consideration of John Locke's Some Thoughts Concerning Education today, we had what I (at least) thought was a very interesting discussion of the reach of Locke's proposals.

Here Wood introduces his second major proposal to reorient the conversation about what is theological about theological education.

Thus a characterization of theology and of what makes theological education theological that is cast, like Wood's, in terms of «action» already has conceptually built into it resources for addressing the justice issues so central to the sort of position illustrated by the Mud Flower Collective's proposal.

Throughout our review of Wood's proposal about what makes theological education theological we have been noting points of convergence with and divergence from the other four voices in this conversation.

Thus Wood's proposal adds an important new issue to the agenda: In what conceptuality do we most fruitfully formulate the basic issues confronting theological education today, propose resolutions of those issues, and debate our disagreements?

As I noted in the first chapter, the proposal is a contribution to a larger, ongoing conversation about what is more frequently called «theological education» than it is called «theological schooling.»

Thus the very way in which the conversation about «theological education» has been conducted gives rise to the third of the three issues to which this proposal is addressed: How can «theological education» be described so that what makes it «theological» is made clear without denying or ignoring its concreteness and the ways in which that concreteness makes it deeply pluralistic?

Hence, even more important than summarizing accurately what they propose will be the effort to trace the movement of their thought as they seek to persuade us of the wisdom of their proposals; so too, more important even than identifying where their proposals explicitly or implicitly exclude one another will be the effort to see how tensions among their contrasting but equally valid insights actually bind them together and force us to find new conceptualities, new frames - of - reference for our analyses of what is theological about theological education.

Such proposals lead to what is often a blind celebration of diversity and pluralism, resulting in a do - it - yourself approach to theological education.

To clarify this, I will describe some of these needs as I see them and then make proposals for what a responsive form of higher education might be.

Recently Brown made a speech about «British Education» what he neglected to say was that any proposals he was making for the so called «British Education» were in fact proposals for «English Education» because Scottish Education is a devoled matter.

Assembly Democrats on Monday evening released their one - house budget proposal, a $ 170 billion spending plan that would fund transportation in New York City through fees on ride hailing services and cabs in Manhattan and add more money for education than what was proposed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

The Governor prioritized education spending in his budget proposal, including growth that is twice what would be allowed under the cap.9 To truly prioritize education the State should reform the Foundation Aid formula to ensure the highest needs districts are properly funded without unnecessarily sending aid to the wealthiest districts.

Students are embarrassed because they know that they are listening to and spouting a bundle of scaremongering lies, spin and propaganda about what is, in fact, a funding proposal that makes higher education free at the point of entry and easier to afford than at any time since Labour introduced tuition fees.

In a conference call with reporters on Monday, Gov. Andrew Cuomo wouldn't venture when asked what his plans are for increasing education spending in the coming budget proposal.

Bob McManus on what he hopes to hear from Cuomo regarding education reform: «Any proposal that lacks meaningful mechanisms for ridding the schools of incompetent teachers — that is, for cracking the union hold on the process — is also fraudulent.»

There's still some leg to reveal: Cuomo is yet to outline his specific plans for education, detail what infrastructure projects he'd like to spend the remaining windfall surplus on, or unveil his proposals to reform the state's criminal justice system.

This year's budget is nothing like that, though education advocates are not thrilled with the governor's aid proposal, which falls about $ 1 billion short of what they were seeking.

If most or all of Success» proposed fourteen new locations are co-located, it will be up to the Department of Education's Panel for Educational Policy, which is run by Fariña and largely politically aligned with the de Blasio administration, to approve what are likely to be highly contentious proposals for space - sharing.

He did not disparage what he's called the «education bureaucracy,» and instead said he wants to adopt his own Common Core commission proposals, which retreat from the governor's former stance tying teacher performance views more closely to standardized tests.

In addition to the housing plan, the Assembly's budget proposal to be unveiled Friday rejects Cuomo's attempt to shift $ 485 million in CUNY costs on to the city and seeks to boost education aid to localities by $ 2.1 billion, more than twice what the governor has proposed.

The project includes interviews with key stakeholders, commissioning essays on how knowledge is developed and used in other fields, the writing of a white paper laying out what a functioning R and D system would look like in U.S. education, and a convening among key stakeholders to discuss this proposal.

Mike Petrilli talks with Hill and Jochim about this proposal, what it would mean for policy and practice at the federal, state, and local levels, and the prospects for its adoption in this edition of The Education Next Book Club.

After completing her master's degree in education policy and management at the Ed School, Smith became a serious «game changer» when she was appointed senior adviser for education for the White House Domestic Policy Council, playing a direct role in what some have called the Obama administration's boldest and most innovative higher education proposals including those related to college access, affordability, and completion.

On the pages that follow, they offer provocative — and concrete — proposals for paying teachers what they are worth while providing students with an education they deserve.

If approved, the proposal — called the Knowledge Utilization in Education Act — would provide yet - to - be-determined sums of money for grants designed both to whet and to feed educators» appetites for what experts in the field are calling «usable» educational research.

The proposal, which could go into effect by 1991 if it is approved by the state board of education, represents what one expert calls «a new phase» in student assessment.

In an editorial this morning on Andrew Cuomo's tax - cap proposal (see background from Peter Meyer here and here), the Gray Lady explains what's driving education costs skyward and comes out in favor of several bold cost - cutting measures:

Also in this issue: A look back at what the Obama administration's signature education reform got wrong, with lessons learned to guide states and districts in refining their teacher evaluation systems, and a warning on the limits of federally - led school reform; a proposal for how to redesign education research under the Every Student Succeeds Act; and a debate on whether there is a federal constitutional right to education.

That's the picture that emerged from an Education Week analysis of waiver proposals submitted last month to the U.S. Department of Education by 11 states, whose plans offer insight into what the next generation of state - led accountability looks like.

It is too soon to say exactly what these proposals will involve, but it is increasingly clear that the existing channels of education reform can no longer lead to much progress.

«Provocatively titled, Disrupting Class is just what America's K - 12 education system needs — a well thought - through proposal for using technology to better serve students and bring our schools into the 21st Century.

Our new report for the Friedman Foundation, Pursuing Innovation, takes a deep dive into that proposal by documenting how much and what types of competition currently exist in K — 12 education, predicting which forms of competition are most likely to generate pressures for improvement in K — 12 education, and brainstorming policy attributes that will maximize the effectiveness of competition - based education reforms.

Whilst I believe this proposal is a good idea, what is to stop another crackpot Secretary of State for Education reversing everything in 5 years» time?

Republican Sen. Scott Schneider of Indianapolis tells The Associated Press that he expects the Senate Education Committee to vote today on a proposal to suspend implementation of the national standards while the State Board of Education holds new hearings on what should be included in Indiana standards.

What happens when these kinds of proposals that grow out of education communities are lost or rendered mute?

«Rather than invest in what we know works in education, this proposal puts resources in strategies with mixed results at the expense of our public school students,» she said.

The Southeast Comprehensive Center completed this report in response to a request by a state department of education for information regarding what other states are using for the definition of high - need districts in their requests for proposals for Mathematics and Science Partnerships.

That's what's bothering fifteen special education national advocacy groups about New York State's proposal.

Education secretary Nicky Morgan said her approval decision was based on the school's revised proposal submitted in September and was in line with legislation and criteria determining what constituted an expansion.

I could go on to defend each of Malloy's proposals point - by - point, but I'll finish by addressing what might be the most controversial education reform proposal out there: linking teacher evaluations to standardized test results.

That's the picture that emerged from an Education Week analysis of waiver proposals submitted last month to the U.S. Department of Education by 11 states, whose proposals offer insight into what the next generation of state - led accountability looks like.

20 Assistant Secretary of Education Chester Finn attacked the charter school proposal, saying it suggested that we did not already know what works in eduEducation Chester Finn attacked the charter school proposal, saying it suggested that we did not already know what works in educationeducation.21

Education proposals coming from Republicans in control of the Wisconsin Legislature and from Gov. Scott Walker have Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Evers speaking out against what he said is a double standard.

To what degree is the proposal topic relevant to AMTE's mission and goals of promoting the improvement of mathematics teacher education?

What were the proposals from the hired consultant to the Equity 2020 committee and Hartford Board of Education?

What followed, however, was a systematic rebutting of the spending plan by Republican members who argued that the administration's proposal to ax education funding by more than $ 9 billion and eliminate dozens of federal education programs would undermine the most underserved and disadvantaged students in their state.

DPI legislative liaison Jennifer Kammerud concurred with Spitzer - Resnick, agreeing that the proposal would strip children with special needs of their federal right at public schools to a «free and appropriate education,» with no guarantees they will get anything approaching what they need in private schools.

If you fully want to understand how much of a farce the Obama Administration's effort to eviscerate the No Child Left Behind Act has become, consider the comments of the panel reviewing what the proposal from the California Office of Reform Education coalition of eight districts that garnered approval last week.