No matter
what family law issue you are facing, we can help.
No matter
what family law issue you face, your time, energy, and money is going to feel like it is running low.
No matter
what family law issue you are facing, we can help.
No matter
what your family law issues may be in Tampa, Tampa Bay, and Hillsborough County, we are confident that we can help.
Not exact matches
Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the
issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the
law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his
family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and
what exactly will it say?
And for that, because the
laws in all these areas are so different and because they change all the time, I really do think that if you want to have a contract then you need to go to a lawyer who is a
family lawyer, who is also really familiar with lesbian and gay and bisexual and transgender
law, who will understand
what the
issues are and
what you might need to put into this agreement, and who can also tell you when you may or may not hold up in court and
what the risks and the benefits are.
So
what was the excluded property at
issue in this hard hitting new
family law case of Excluded Property FLA Presumption of Advancement?
«While this court must take and does take the
issue of abuse of a child very seriously,» the footnote said, «the fact that a trial judge tells parents that unless one of them «cops to an admission of
what happened to the child» they are going to lose their child, flies in the face of not only the CPSL, but of the entire body of case
law with regard to best interests of the child and
family reunification.
What:
Family law attorney Molly Kenny will speak on a myriad of
issues concerning the Uniform Child...
In
what was widely considered the most important
family law case of the decade, with national implications, Burns won a unanimous Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) ruling on the
issue of trust assets as marital property that could be divided in divorce proceedings.
I do want to give you one example though, which is at the Rise Women's Legal Centre we've had clients come in with literally suitcases full of documents from over a decade of not having a lawyer and
what means is that something that could have been resolved fairly simply at the front end, if they had been able to access even summary advice at the beginning, let alone some minimal representation, they might have had their
family law issues resolved much earlier.
Home Mary Zogg
Family Law Divorce Collaborative Divorce
Family Law Mediation Child Custody Child Support Child Custody / Support Enforcement Fathers Rights Post Judgment Modifications Division of Marital Property Marital Agreements Unmarried Father's Rights Alimony Geographic Child Relocation Mediation Articles Florida Divorce Jurisdiction Childrens
Issues and Timesharing Paternity Questions Petition for Relocation
What You Need to Know about Alimony VIDEO FAQs Testimonials Contact Us Sitemap
Home Mary Zogg
Family Law Divorce Collaborative Divorce
Family Law Mediation Child Custody Child Support Child Custody / Support Enforcement Post Judgment Modifications Division of Marital Property Marital Agreements Unmarried Father's Rights Alimony Geographic Child Relocation Mediation Articles Florida Divorce Jurisdiction Childrens
Issues and Timesharing Paternity Questions Petition for Relocation
What You Need to Know about Alimony VIDEO FAQs Testimonials Contact Us Sitemap
Home Mary Zogg
Family Law Divorce Collaborative Divorce
Family Law Mediation Child Custody Child Support Child Custody / Support Enforcement Post Judgment Modifications Division of Marital Property Marital Agreements Unmarried Father's Rights Alimony Geographic Child Relocation Mediation Articles Florida Divorce Jurisdiction Childrens
Issues and Timesharing Modification Contempt and Enforcement The Truth About Alimony Benfits of a Prenup Talking to Kids About Divorce Marital and Non-Marital Property Paternity Questions Petition for Relocation
What You Need to Know about Alimony VIDEO FAQs Testimonials Contact Us Sitemap
In other news: Canadian Lawyer Magazine takes an intelligent look at the controversy surrounding the expanding role of paralegals in
family law matters in Ontario; and Julie was interviewed by Michael Enright on CBC's Sunday Edition last weekend about the SRL crisis — why it's happening,
what the response has been from the profession, and
what it takes to address the
issues.
What types of
family law issues can be resolved using the CFL process?
My conclusions after research the
issue of
what impact medical and recreational marijuana use are having on custody decisions in
family law cases is as follows:
The over-arching principle in
family law regarding children, no matter
what the
issue, is to determine
what is in the «best interests of the child».
Who &
What: For women who have or are experiencing violence in their relationships and require legal support with the resulting
family law and other legal
issues.
If the parties have agreed a
family law arbitrator should resolve the
issues between them, then shouldn't that include variation of the order that governs their relations as that is clearly
what the parties intended?
«I think it's incumbent on us as professionals to do
what we can to educate our clients about the kinds of decisions they may need to make while they're going through the separation process and the importance of taking things one step at a time and making sure that the live
issues in their
family law matter are settled before they're incurring any new financial obligations.»
Specifically, he talked about his instrumental work on the National Action Committee on Civil and
Family Justice, and
what he envisions the role of students and
law schools to be in addressing
issues of access to justice (A2J).
In
what is perhaps the most obvious sign that cities are turning a blind eye to the
law just to make a few extra bucks, here's a story of a woman who was in a funeral procession for a
family member, was waived through a red light by a police escort, and was later
issued a red light camera ticket.
FAMILY LAW — APPEAL — INTERIM PARENTING — Where there is nothing anomalous about the primary judge finding, by virtue of s 61DA (3) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dism
FAMILY LAW — APPEAL — INTERIM PARENTING — Where there is nothing anomalous about the primary judge finding, by virtue of s 61DA (3) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismiss
LAW — APPEAL — INTERIM PARENTING — Where there is nothing anomalous about the primary judge finding, by virtue of s 61DA (3) of the
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dism
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismiss
Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed
what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered
what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the
issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismissed.
After seeing
what court battles can do to
families, many attorneys just want to do the right thing, and they see that the collaborative process is a much healthier, non-adversarial manner of resolving
family law issues.
Child custody and visitation
issues are determined by the various
laws and procedures in various states, and
family lawyers can explain the procedure in your state,
what the
laws are, and
what your parenting rights are after entering a court order.
The material presented on PAS in the legal arena is devoted to
what attorneys and judges have to say about PAS, which can be a key
issue in certain depend ency and criminal proceedings, as well as in
family law court.
Although divorce and other
family law issues are among the most stressful of situations, you are not powerless to decide
what type of divorce you are going to have, even if you are not the initiating spouse.
My background working in the past as a therapist and clinical supervisor in children and
family counseling programs, and litigating children's
issues in
family and dependency (abuse and neglect) cases, is helpful in trying to resolve children's
issues based on
what is best for the child - which is the legal standard under Florida
law, and in litigating these
issues when we need to go to trial.