Sentences with phrase «what federal science»
Marburger's attendance provides postdocs with a unique opportunity to discuss what federal science - policy initiatives may improve their working conditions.
http://www.sciencemag.org/ Not exact matches
On Monday, as Irma weakened over Georgia, Bossert used a White House briefing to offer more hints of an emerging climate resilience policy, while notably avoiding accepting climate change science: «What President Trump is committed to is making sure that federal dollars aren't used to rebuild things that will be in harm's way later or that won't be hardened against the future predictable floods that we see.
Disregarding sound nutritional science has real and troubling implications for all of us, regardless of what state we live in, in that it may weaken the proposed Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) and undercut our federal school food nutritional standards.
Perhaps best known for advocating that the nation guard against the potential influence of the military — industrial complex, a term he is credited with coining, the speech also expressed concerns about planning for the future and the dangers of massive spending, especially deficit spending, the prospect of the domination of science through Federal funding and, conversely, the domination of science - based public policy by what he called a «scientific - technological elite».
On fracking: «Cuomo says he wants to wait for the science but he altered the federal fracking study to have the science say what he wanted.
Although federal support for science is lagging, Biden quoted President John F. Kennedy speaking about the race to the moon, saying Americans are «unwilling to postpone» what needs to be done to accelerate cancer research.
Federal funding of science and technology may fall short of what is needed to keep the U.S. research enterprise competitive, said AAAS CEO Rush Holt, but he also increasingly hears «concerns about what I would call an ongoing trend that goes back many years, even decades, where ideology and ideological assertions have been crowding out evidence in public and private debates and policymaking.»
In your view, why have American students fallen behind over the last three decades, and what role should the federal government play to better prepare students of all ages for the science and technology - driven global economy?
Hosting seminars covering science policy topics, such as biosafety regulations and what working as a scientist in the federal government is like, provides a valuable opportunity for researchers to learn from experts about these issues.
Still, the real details of who gets what in the 2018 budget — including what science will get federal funding support — will come as Congress works on an omnibus appropriations bill, expected in late March.
For the ninth time since 2005, the science advocacy group sent out a survey to more than 63,000 federal scientists across 16 agencies to gather information about what's happening inside the federal government in relation to scientific integrity.
Akin sits on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, which is responsible for much of the U.S. federal science enterprise, so he should be aware of what science actually says about key policy Science, Space, and Technology, which is responsible for much of the U.S. federal science enterprise, so he should be aware of what science actually says about key policy science enterprise, so he should be aware of what science actually says about key policy science actually says about key policy issues.
A new essay by the oversight body of the National Science Foundation explains what federal research officials must do if the United States hopes to remain the world's leading scientific power.
Just days after the midterm elections, a report from the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and a related story in The New York Times examined what would happen to federal science agencies if the GOP carried through on their planned budgeScience (AAAS) and a related story in The New York Times examined what would happen to federal science agencies if the GOP carried through on their planned budgescience agencies if the GOP carried through on their planned budget cuts.
What is required is an organized partnership among research universities; local, state, and federal governments; private foundations; and private industry, all of which have a substantial stake in the future of science.»
In a paper published today in Science, epidemiologist Thomas Van Boeckel of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich and colleagues outline the growing threat — and what can be done about it.
... in 45 minutes: Take our course Understanding the Federal R&D Budget and get an overview of the steps in the federal budget process, what influences it, how it comes together in the Executive Branch and Congress and how budget politics and science funding inFederal R&D Budget and get an overview of the steps in the federal budget process, what influences it, how it comes together in the Executive Branch and Congress and how budget politics and science funding infederal budget process, what influences it, how it comes together in the Executive Branch and Congress and how budget politics and science funding interact.
Opponents of the idea argued it would have hindered some social science and student research, and would not have closed what the final rule states is «the real gap» in regulation: institutions that get no federal funding.
What began in 1983 as a noble piece of federal legislation that sought to place science ahead of politics, and fairness, equity, and openness above congressional parochialism has degenerated into a technical and ethical quagmire, where facts are routinely twisted to serve predetermined ends and where «might makes right» has replaced «consultation, concurrence, and cooperation» as the federal mantra for the program.
If the cuts in the skinny budget had made it into law, they «would've really decimated the federal sciences,» and not just what the agencies do themselves, but in academia as well «because that's where the grants come from,» Shultz, said.
The Senate had approved $ 90 million — compared with $ 100 million in the 1985 spending bill — for what was once intended to be the federal government's flagship program to improve mathematics and science education.
(Christian Science Monitor) Betsy DeVos Was Just Confirmed as Education Secretary — Here's what she will control (Business Insider) Professor Paul Reville elucidates the role of the Secretary of Education in the Current Federal Landscape.
A federal judge in San Francisco has ordered parties in a landmark global warming lawsuit to hold what could be the first - ever U.S. court hearing on the science of climate change....
What would be news would be a fresh column from George Will building on his January rebuke of Republican lawmakers seemingly seeking to lead a charge away from federal support for science.
«Ben Santer [federal climatologist] just published a pal - reviewed paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science loudly proclaiming that the dreaded man - made global warming signal has emerged from our naturally chaotic climate... pretty much what he wrote in Naturefor the UN's 1996 edition of this conference, 16 years ago.
If the science of climate change really is «established», as popular media insist, what's wrong with cutting federal spending on climate research, as President Donald Trump's budget proposes to do?
With a decision that could have far - reaching implications, a federal judge in California has ordered the first ever U.S. court hearing on climate science for a «public nuisance» lawsuit, meaning that major oil and gas companies for the first time may have to go on the record regarding what they knew about the planetary impacts of their products — and when.
On Monday, as Irma weakened over Georgia, Bossert used a White House briefing to offer more hints of an emerging climate resilience policy, while notably avoiding accepting climate change science: «What President Trump is committed to is making sure that federal dollars aren't used to rebuild things that will be in harm's way later or that won't be hardened against the future predictable floods that we see.
This law would radically constrain EPA's ability to issue new environmental regulations as situations and science evolved (to say nothing of what it would do to other federal agencies).
The fallout from this March 21 tutorial hearing was that enviro - activists ignored what the judge concluded about that «GCC / GCSCT» material and instead proclaimed a hugely overgeneralized victory about the position stated by Chevron's attorney * (* author's addition: which is noted my April 19, 2018 blog post), while Michael Bastasch at The Daily Caller reported that a «Federal Judge Dismissed Claim Of A Conspiracy To Suppress Global Warming Science.»
Our Children's Trust has launched a multi-pronged suite of lawsuits across the U.S. making similar arguments and asking states and the federal government to provide what Welle said is «science - based relief» when it comes to climate change.
This is what Larry Marshall, the chief executive of Australia's federal science agency CSIRO, wrote in an email to staff earlier this month:
JG: What is the relationship between federal government and the science community like these days?
That's what's so interesting about the Blue Diversion toilet developed by Eawag, the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology.
«The Christian Science Monitor» featured Law Professor Darren Rosenblum in «Federal courts ask: What is the meaning of «sex»?»
I observed that the federal senior career science technocracy executives had issues of when the lines were crossed on what I call complicity and collaborationism.
Importantly, states were required to spend at least three - quarters of the federal funds on home visiting models that met federal standards of evidence - based effectiveness.1 As many policy scholars have noted, that a national initiative brought the importance of evidence - based practice to the forefront of public policy is a triumph for social science and demonstrates the importance of rigorous program evaluation.2 With that triumph, however, comes a responsibility to ensure that the public's expectations for success of these programs are consistent with what researchers understand about the empirical evidence — will the same positive outcomes found in programs» randomized controlled trials emerge when those programs are taken to scale?