Sentences with phrase «what follows that kind»

Not exact matches

Some of these tweeters appreciated the kind words, followed the links to Sinkin's website, and liked what they saw.

As our economy becomes increasingly global, competitive, and innovation - based, it follows that knowledge, expertise and 21st century skills will be what Canadians — and Canada — need to achieve the kind of career success and economic prosperity we want.

And secondly, once those app developers are operative and have apps collecting personal data what kind of follow up and active oversight steps does Facebook take to give us all reassurance that the type of issue that appears to have occurred in relation to Cambridge Analytica won't happen again.»

What Governor Rajan did say, in his remarks made off the attached written text, was that the policies followed by major central banks around the world were in danger of slipping into the kind of beggar - thy - neighbour strategies that were followed in the 1930s.

Mark Whitmore: This is Mark Whitmore, I keep forgetting we have two Mark's on the line here, and Chris you absolutely interpreted what I was trying to say correctly, and kind of to follow up a little bit, I think one of the things that the other Mark pointed out is the issue of timing, and whereas the two prevailing investing paradigms out there seem to be this notion of efficient market theory which attempts to just buy and hold the market no matter what, completely price indifferent.

Sometimes, the way this plays out is women passively following along in an ambiguous, awkward, who - knows - what - this - is kind of relationship where they have no idea if the guy is interested in them or just sees them as their «sister in Christ.»

No matter what the truth, the thinking classes, with the sophisticated journalists following obediently behind, have regarded the Democrats as their kind and most Republicans as dunces.

Mark, I am curious, what part of Jesus or what kind of Jesus, since the scriptures aren't reliable, is it you appreciate and want to follow?

If that man or woman is a true leader, and kind, and honest, and humble, then we will be all AOK, no matter what system we follow.

thankfully, many modern christians cherry - pick the bible and skip over these kinds of hateful messages, but i'm curious how any christians come down on Fred Phelps as he is just following what the bible really says.

When «take up your cross and follow me» becomes a commercial item and is tailored for select markets, what kind of a cross is it?

One could argue that one of the fundamental problems which many religions seek to address (although each with a different vocabulary) is articulated in the following questions: What kind of Being could know birth and death, ecstasy and terror, in the same instant?

The most unnerving issue isn't that he says this or believes it, it's the fact that he preaches and advocates this to people who believe and follow what he says only because they think he's some kind of advocate for a higher power.

More often, though, he aims at a kind of sardonic comedy, as in his «Rejection Note for Paradise Regained,» imagining what John Milton's publishers might have said to his follow - up to Paradise Lost:

The values suggested in what follows are offered in illustration of the kind of objective that might follow from commitment to excellence.

Note the following quotations from Hartshorne's various writings from 1952 through 1984: God is that one in whom prehensions are «wholly concrete... without eliminations of any kind» (ReM 7:109); «what we once were to God, less than that we can never be» (JR 32:101; also LP 252);»... if we can never be less than we have been to God, we can in reality never be less than we have been... That there can be no subtraction is, in my opinion, more certain than that there can be no addition» (JR 32:102, LP 253); «What in us is extremely partial, feeble retention of the past may in God be complete, ideally vivid and adequate retention» (OOTM what we once were to God, less than that we can never be» (JR 32:101; also LP 252);»... if we can never be less than we have been to God, we can in reality never be less than we have been... That there can be no subtraction is, in my opinion, more certain than that there can be no addition» (JR 32:102, LP 253); «What in us is extremely partial, feeble retention of the past may in God be complete, ideally vivid and adequate retention» (OOTM What in us is extremely partial, feeble retention of the past may in God be complete, ideally vivid and adequate retention» (OOTM 34).

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

i guess that answer depends on what kind of flock you follow and whether or not you're into the hive mentality.

First, that Archbishop Mennini has considerable respect for Bishop Davies, whom he clearly sees as the kind of bishop we need more of in this country: he almost certainly found out about Mgr Egan, who has so far maintained a fairly low profile, from Bishop Davies: the fact that he has followed his advice shows what kind of bishop he is now looking to appoint.

They often include provisions about religious practices for the couple and for any children who may arrive; whether or not they plan to have children; what they will do in the case of a pregnancy not wanted by one or the other; what will happen if the couple decides to separate; what the financial arrangements will be in such a case; what provision will be made for the children; how in - laws, relatives, and friends will be included in the relationship; what sexual practices will be followed; under what circumstances the couple will move from one home to another; whose job will take precedence; and what kinds of freedom each partner is to have.

In the following paragraphs an effort will be made to investigate whether and to what extent the mood of the boundless, so characteristic of the American spirit, constitutes a kind of soft and yielding tyranny into which the eschatological and bounded finalities of the gospel are absorbed without great effect.

If we are not willing to follow in the humility of Jesus, then what kind of witness does that bear about us and about our art?

What kind of girl sleeps around and then thinks she can follow Jesus and be committed to one man for the rest of her life?

What kind of just, loving god sends people to eternal torment (or oblivion) for incorrectly following the ambiguous «clues» and guessing Miss Scarlett in the Kitchen with a rope instead of Professor Plum in the Ballroom with a revolver?

What kind of God would make such a wonderful creation, give it impossible rules to live by, and then burn it alive because it couldn't follow them?

Follow - up questions to yourself would be to ask, «What kind of being would want me to fear him?

I can't help but think this world would be so much kinder if religion was eradicated and people based their judgements on actual events and not blindly follow what ANY book tells them.

god destoryed the world with water because HE failed to create a creation that would follow rules... what kind of god fails at creating something that won't follow its rules to the point of global destruction / cleansing?

More important, he revealed to his followers what kind of Messiah they followed.

In what follows my aim is not so much to provide as to provoke that kind of reflection.

What began as a kind of public humiliation of «the angriest man in the world» slowly transformed into a cult following of a man who insisted... with choice words... on living a life of integrity.

What kind of «opportunity» did god give those babies to follow him?

What kind of program did you follow to lose the weight?

I don't follow the glaze proportions as it directs here, I just kind of eye ball it and make waaay more than what this calls for.

If you want to look at some pictures of food or the Bay Area, follow me on Instagram to see what kind of adventures I get into over the weekend.

While each individual tour may offer slight variations, guests will be presented with the following: • Explanation of the Falkner vineyard from the balcony of the tasting room • Who are the owners and some insight about them • What is the Falkner Winery brand • What is unique about Falkner Winery • What kind of events are conducted at Falkner Winery • Explanation of the wine crush process from the crush pad • Detailed discussion about one of the Falkner wines and what makes it higher quaWhat is the Falkner Winery brand • What is unique about Falkner Winery • What kind of events are conducted at Falkner Winery • Explanation of the wine crush process from the crush pad • Detailed discussion about one of the Falkner wines and what makes it higher quaWhat is unique about Falkner Winery • What kind of events are conducted at Falkner Winery • Explanation of the wine crush process from the crush pad • Detailed discussion about one of the Falkner wines and what makes it higher quaWhat kind of events are conducted at Falkner Winery • Explanation of the wine crush process from the crush pad • Detailed discussion about one of the Falkner wines and what makes it higher quawhat makes it higher quality

I would like make this but was kind of loss following your recipe but what happen to the sponge dough?

Set it to tinkly, melancholy piano, and have them explain in their own words what it was like to watch the same team fail so horribly in the same kinds of games the following season with the same roster.

The new owners took control at the start of the 2012 season, so we had to wait to see what kind of splash they would make that following offseason, if any.

The subject of numerous local articles already, he had promotional videos, a considerable Instagram following, and, of course, those fliers strung up like some kind of vaguely sinister, highly sexualized cobweb to lure fame, all before it was clear precisely on what substance fame should come calling.

In my opinion, these kind of discussion are so incredibly important for keeping a cool head throughout what will be a long improvement process, and for allowing a plan to be followed not subject to emotions, but clear logic.

What followed is, in retrospect, kind of astounding: as they grew more and more artistically inventive, they drew more and more fans.

After all, what could be more depressing than the knowledge that you share a hobby, a passion, an obsession with the kind of people who will — to take this latest incident, as captured by a member of the public following Chelsea's 1 - 1 draw with Paris Saint - Germain — push a black man off a train, then sing about how proud they are to be racist.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

While us fans nurse our way through the following day with Gatorade, Advil and some kind of burger on a pretzel bun, losing teams have entire offseasons to dwell on what could have been.

Three days later, we sat here wondering what Juventus could do for an encore following a revitalizing kind of showing against Lazio.

I wonder what kind of «have your say» reaction there would have been if social media had existed and phone in shows had been so prevalent after our lacklustre 2 - 1 defeat to derby in the run up to anfield 89, or following our horrible 6 - 2 league cup defeat in the title winning season of 1990 - 91 for example!

Indeed, if we walk students through every step of creating the journal (what kind of notebook, what sort of margins, how many words per entry, double - spaced, type - written or inked) we send a strong message about journaling and about learning in general: namely that it is a direction - following game, that the answers reside with the teacher, who will walk you through the steps to the puzzle until you arrive at the right answer.

My contact there was kind enough to investigate for me and then told me that the USDA had apparently revised its policy and that «districts may now release leftover food to charitable nonprofit organizations under the following conditions...» I've attached these conditions in a Word document here but to summarize, a district has to (1) take care not to create waste in the first place by over-ordering; (2) be sure that health codes are followed, and (3) enter into what looks like a pretty standard written agreement with the charity.

«For most mums, it may not be realistic to follow a strict, regimented program — what's more important is to do any kind of exercise regularly and get in the habit of exercising again.»