Sentences with phrase «what founders»

The doge was out of the bag, and the community accelerated the project beyond what the founders could imagine.

Alba and Paltrow rightly identify the app as a magnet for creeps, and Will.i.am is having none of what the founders are selling.

What the founders of MyCase were able to do is truly inspirational.

Somehow I suspect that's what our founders, at least the Jeffersonian faction, intended.

Until We the People get a clue about what the founders meant for us and why we will most certainly loose this country.

They never hear of the founding principles of this country, or what the founders sacrificed.

Compared to what the founders of Google etc... But I delight in correction, as always

If you guys don't want to listen to me nor my reasoning, read what the founders have to say:

It has, in a sense, served as the nation's conscience, reminding Americans of what the founders had hoped they would be and thereby providing a vivifying counterpoint to the excesses of materialist individualism.»

The Inspiration Project is a new concept in writing retreats, offering what the founders call «creative time - outs»: weekend events which focus on delivering practical advice about the publishing industry and developing a career as a writer, while also giving participants the time, space and inspiration to...

What the Founders didn't count on was that, even though they easily conquer the technologically backward natives they encounter when they first arrive, these Ddaerans have mystifying powers that will make them dangerous enemies

Do you think that's what the Founders had in mind when they signed the Declaration of Independence?

In another instance, students are asked to imagine what the founders of the United States would think about students in America today.

- What founders of highly - effective charter schools say matters the most in Unchartered Territory

Surely that's not what the founders — or Horace Mann — had in mind.

Thats what the founders of the parent volunteer program Three for Me reasoned — and they discovered once parents got a taste of volunteering, they were eager to keep coming back.

I wonder what the founders are up to now?

I've been following TMRP for a while and I am absolutely in awe of what founders Erin and Scott Littleton have done.

We learn what it was like to get Addgene off the ground and what the founders hope to see in the repository's future.

Yet this is precisely what the founders of our republic envisioned when they devised the Electoral College, a singular body with a singular purpose: to afford, as Alexander Hamilton explained to the people of New York in Federalist No. 68, «a moral certainty, that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.»»

It was the opposite of what the Founders envisioned for the United States, a place where, supposedly, everyone was born with a roughly equal opportunity to succeed.

Had I come of age during the great crisis of 1914 — 1945, or even during the tense, early decades of the Cold War, it's likely I, too, would have sought to defuse the consolidated energies of sovereign peoples, which is what the founders of what became the European Union did in the years after the war.

Despite calling the idea that we can know what the Founders really thought on religious issues «an illusion,» Kramnick and Moore criticize those who view the U.S. as a Christian state: «The principal framers of the American political system wanted no religious parties in national politics.

Go back to what our founders and our founding documents meant — they're quite clear — that we would create law based on the God of the Bible and the Ten Commandments, it's quite simple.»

You better learn what our founders thought about the tyranny of the majority.

I don't give two saviors what the founders of a business believe, but when they start assaulting other people with it, I have a problem.

Sound - bite jingoistic politics is what the founders feared and why they created a republic instead of a democracy.

Finally, leadership in a democracy requires the virtue of public - spiritedness; what the founders of the country called public virtue, a readiness to sacrifice self - interest to the common good.

WRT your point about the MIC, I'm a conservative Christian and am quite willing to see our military capability reduced to a level consistent with what the founders envisioned as our international role (that is, a military that is capable of defending the United States against any foe, including taking the fight to the enemy, not running around being the world's cop).

This is a profound violation of what the Founders understood as just government derived from the consent of the governed.

No, our government was formed based on what the founders had gleaned from POLITICAL philosophies from all over the world.

Yet the Congressional Military Industrial Complex a cadre of congress people who chair and sit on committees that authorize military spending have bankrupted the nation and in the wake of 9 - 11 created a host of liberty robbing laws that are the anti-thesis to what our founders wanted.

There is a big difference between government having people in it and policies affected by beliefs (religious or otherwise) but that is a far cry from a theocracy or an establishment of one religion over another which is what the Founders were leery of.

As with Murray and those who insist that the founders «built better than they knew,» what the founders may have meant is less significant than what they actually gave us and how that gift was destined to be received in an emerging culture infused with voluntaristic, nominalist, and mechanistic assumptions about God and nature.

In a post for Libertyblog, Dan Smyth argues that in order to avoid a breach of our first amendment rights, we must adhere to what the Founders would have understood to be a «religious» organization.

What they ARE talking about is a secular government, which is what the founders intended.

There is no denying that he is enthusiastic about what the Founders called a novus ordo seclorum, a new order for the ages.

A Texas - based micro venture capital fund called TrueWealth Ventures has been launched to take advantage of what the founders believe is an underfunded, high - performing opportunity segment, female - led startups, and is raising a $ 20m fund.

The only difference would be broader property ownership, which is what the founders thought was important to sustain American democracy.

Read on for a primer on patents and what founders should know about when, where and how to seek protection for their technologies.

Here's why I loved it: It breaks down the essence of what founders need to understand as they move forward.

But what the founders of medical information company Janus Choice uniquely understand is how difficult it can be when a loved one needs to leave the hospital.

To understand what these founders do differently, we've compiled a list of habits that made them succe...

This concept of creating something that few others see — and the reality distortion field necessary to recruit the team to build it — is at the heart of what these founders do.

Yet, I'm far more interested in what a founder is doing today and where they are headed tomorrow.

If you're a fan of Shark Tank, you've likely seen the panel of investors scoff at what a founder claims his business is worth.

More than 40 percent of startups fail simply because nobody in the real world was interested in buying what the founder thought was a good idea.

But back in early May, Tesla said exactly the opposite of what its founder is saying now in an SEC filing.

SolidEnergy, by contrast, can use existing lithium - ion manufacturing processes, to produce what founder and CEO Qichao Hu calls «real - world batteries.»

Asked what Founder Institute did for her, she was clear that, «The program lays out lots of things an early entrepreneur might not realize, from ways to incorporate to the paths and processes to creating a company.