Sentences with phrase «what framers»

Originalism, of course, is the view that constitutions mean what their framers thought they meant, as versus the view that constitutions evolve with the times.
«If what the framers of the legislation had in mind was that the leave test was going to be a meaningful obstacle that would screen out cases, there's no indication in the two cases that have decided leave so far that that's going to happen,» he said.
It could and often does lead to stalemate which is what the framers were looking for when they designed our republic.
So, what framers really need to know is that DECOR Expo Atlanta and New York are under completely new management and will give them an exemplary experience.
And repeated extensions of existing terms can not be what the framers meant by «limited times.»
help stimulate student thinking about why we need checks and balances, what the framers of the Constitution were trying to achieve, and other governmental approaches to balancing power.
Direct democracy was not what the framers of the United States Constitution envisioned for the nation.
This, of course, is not what the Framers intended.
what the framers of the constitution really intended was that confidentiality and privacy should apply to impeachment proceedings under this article.
Yes, you are correct - and that it what the framers intended.
«Why» is not a very helpful question when considering English laws: even a quotation from Hansard saying what the framers of the law hoped to achieve is not generally acceptable in court, as the judges have to apply the law as it was written, not what was intended.
She has, they say, a respect for what the framers meant by the Constitution, and therefore may turn out to be a surprise to some of her judicially activist supporters.
You speak on what is «True Doctrine», could we also point to something such as the Consti; tution and the daily court room arguments of lawyers and clerks who feel that they alone know and understand the true meaning of the what the framers when they wrote the laws of this land?
But to claim that such a viewpoint is what the Framers had in mind when they wrote the Constitution in 1787 is, as Justice Byron White noted in another context, «at best facetious.»
The first reason merely requires the judge to discern what the framers arid ratifiers meant, not to make up new rights the judge regards as «natural.»
On the contrary, the Constitution extends the highest protection to what the framers believed to be the inalienable right to exercise religion according to the dictates of individual conscience.
Have you forgotten what the framers of this country believed in?
Richard Maybury talks about what the framers of the U.S. Constitution had in mind compared to the political power that we see in the government today.

Not exact matches

I would love to hear what our key Constitutional framers would say to that.
On a somewhat deeper but still visible plane the framers saw that the originality of the novus ordo — what made it, in fact, a new order — lay in the unprecedented degree of liberty each citizen possessed to define the course of his or her own «pursuit of happiness.»
As it happened, the texts reflect a relatively brief period of the dominance of a variation of Enlightenment thought — although, to be sure, those texts must be understood, as the framers certainly did understand them, against the background assumptions of what in fact was a Christian society and culture.
Who can deny that the Court is right that what we have here is a new birth of freedom, and arguably one consistent with individualistic principles that we can arguably find among our Framers and in the Constitution itself?
You have stated what you believe that the separation is of Church from the State but it has also been argued that it is that after fighting the English crown who is also the head of the church, the framers desired that the Government shall have no place within the Church.
What you quote is a bunch of propaganda published a century or more later that has been tailored to express the bible framers beliefs.
The framers specifically inserted this ban on such endorsements because of what they witnessed in Europe that people forget about here.
Despite calling the idea that we can know what the Founders really thought on religious issues «an illusion,» Kramnick and Moore criticize those who view the U.S. as a Christian state: «The principal framers of the American political system wanted no religious parties in national politics.
While sharing many common moral concerns in what were then called the «culture wars,» the framers of ECT determined to address these issues precisely as believers in Jesus Christ.
Although written in quaint terms, they essentially comprise what the authors of the Constitution (termed «framers») thought a country on the international and internal stage needed to be able to do.
Although the U.S. has a federalist framework, since roughly the administration of Theodore Roosevelt administration and with a larger expansion under FDR, the federal government has been growing in size and scope far beyond what the original framers of the constitution ever intended.
We found out exactly what you need to support your body in growing a new set of face framers.
If you recent changed which type of filter you use, you may want to go back to that style / brand of filter (unless that filter is a Fram filter — plenty of stuff out there on it, but here is a good example with pictures of exactly what I'm talking about).
With all the design work invested by the better picture frame importers and manufacturers to fabricate elegant profiles and utilize glorious wood veneers, why would you, the professional picture framer, produce work that's indistinguishable from what can be purchased ready - made?
As framers we know what we like about a particular frame.
For the Whitechapel Gallery group show Spirit of Utopia, featuring ten artists and collectives from around the world and bringing together an assembled exploration of the «what if» scenario, Liversidge has created this limited edition, Proposal for Whitechapel Editions, as a diptych: part manually type - written, part silver - leafed, each proposal has been framed by Darbyshire Framers.
Selected group exhibitions include After The Thrill has Gone (Richmond Center for Visual Arts, Virginia, 2016), Re (as) ssisting Narratives (Framer Framed, Amsterdam, 2016), International Short Film Festival (Oberhausen, 2016), When Tomorrow Comes (Wits Art Museum, Johannesburg; Michaelis Galleries, Cape Town, 2015), DIS / PLACE (MoCADA, Brooklyn, 2015), AFIRIperFOMA (Lagos, 2015); What Remains is Tomorrow (South African Pavilion, Venice Biennale, 2015), La Fabrique (De L'Homme Moderne, in association with the Lyon Biennale, La Fabric, 2015), Solomon Foundation for Contemporary Art (2015), Foreign Bodies (WHATIFTHEWORLD, Cape Town, 2015), Broken English (Tyburn Gallery, London, 2015), Brave New World... 20 Years of Democracy (Iziko South African National Gallery, Cape Town, 2014),!
The current terrain bears little resemblance to the culture wars of a decade ago, much less to what the First Amendment's Framers could have imagined.
Well, now that you have an idea of what the Guerrilla Framer column is all about — making money — let me warn you about what you won't find here.
For Rachel Harrison's second exhibition at Regen Projects, «Three Young Framers,» the artist overlays multiple framing devices, as if to ask: What's in a frame...
And, the amount of money wasted on wind frams, pointless Kyoto accords, carbon taxes and what hve you has served only to divert money that should have been spent on frackning in the short term and on getting atomic energy underway in the long term underway, and planning for sensible adpataion.
[16] The width of the Fram Strait is what allows for both inflow and outflow on the Atlantic side of the Arctic Ocean.
Long - term changes in atmospheric circulation have resulted in an increased amount of perennial sea ice being exported through Fram Strait rather than being recirculated (e.g., Beaufort Gyre); this was what set up the 2007 record September minimum.
The animation in Kaleschke's tweet shows what happened to the ice between Fram Strait and the Lincoln Sea, but here are two images by ASIF commenters Uniquorn and A-Team showing the situation (from the 2017/2018 freezing season thread):
Flushing through Fram Strait occurs almost constantly, no matter how thick the ice is, or what Oscillation dominates, its a natural phenomena of great consistency.
Main What Did the Framers Mean by «No»?»
«What Did the Framers Really Mean?»
Hopefully, you get the idea: that the rules of statutory interpretation are supposed to not only help clarify what we read but also to bring us into the parliamentarian heart whereby we can see and feel the purpose of the framers of legislation in writing the Act.
... With such specific wording in contemporary state constitutions, why was not a similar wording adopted for the First Amendment if its framers intended to prohibit nothing more than what the States were prohibiting?»
Remember, contracts / constitutions are deemd to mean legally what the «framers» intended them to mean.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z