Sentences with phrase «what free speech»

«That is what free speech is about, and I fully support it.»

keith thanks for your service... but I guess you don't know what free speech actually is, seems like only a person expressing one view is ok.

The right to offend is what free speech looks like in practice, and the whole point about free speech is you don't pick who gets to enjoy it.

If its the comments upsetting you then, like it or not, this is what free speech is about.

That's what free speech is all about, right?

Not exact matches

That's not what «free speech» implies.

«I'm tried of giving them this free [free speech] waiver over what is happening... The platforms are not built with human users in mind.»

«We've had enough of the lies, the sanctimony, the arrogance, the hatred, the pettiness, the fake news,» Loesch said in the minute - long video, calling out «every lying member of the media,» «every Hollywood phony,» «the role model athletes who use their free speech to alter and undermine what our flag represents,» and «politicians who would rather let America burn than lose one ounce of their personal power.»

Everyone agrees what democracy ought to look like when it comes to picking governments: secret ballots, free speech and no dirty tricks.

That's what makes this moment so exceptional, especially for the tech brands that live in the eye of the free speech hurricane.

In the same way there are limits to free speech in the U.S., there's limits to what you can do on Reddit.

More funding will bring more scrutiny, and Patreon will have the tough job of walking the free - speech - without - filth tightrope in codifying what exactly is allowed and enforcing those rules.

«That approach is fundamentally regulatory, imposing ongoing government oversight on what should preferably be a free market,» Delrahim said during a speech earlier this month.

Part of what explains why the United States has been so reluctant to enact regulations on the internet and technology is the matter of free speech, as mandated by the US Constitution.

She concurred that given limits to government control of free speech, companies do have more freedom to police what's out there.

I think what I'm getting at is this: Imagine 100 like - minded people (each with an obvious right to free speech) band together to speak on electoral politics.

Facebook doesn't like to decide what kind of rhetoric is appropriate or inappropriate for fear of encroaching on its users» free speech rights.

If you ask them, I'm pretty sure that most liberal mainstream journalists are against punching conservatives who are peacefully exercising their rights to free speech - and they will probably mean what they say.

You believe in free speech as long as it's what you want to hear.

When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for human rights, women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.

SisterChromatid - your missing my point I am not trying to trample anyone else s free speech, I just personally think it could have been said differently, what they said makes them appear like the self righteous ones and that helps no one, as someone who is spiritual and gay I have been judged by both Christians and atheists alike, one says I am going to hell the other says I'm a nutjob, when does it stop?

While I do support free speech, I can't deny my in ability to sort all this out from where I happen to be, dissociated from the major «players» having direct involvement with the situation at hand (which has gone way beyond what I thought this thread would be about, initially).

The entire staff of CNN has been forced to convert to mormonism ahead of the election out of fear of what concentration camp they will go in for their belief in free speech if romney wins.

Second I believe in free speech and freedom to worship as I see fit as long as I don't cause physical harm to anyone and the freedom to believe what I want to regardless of what anyone else thinks.

Because of our legal system and free speech they can't get away with what they would like to see in place regarding women.

You are correct about free speech: we should be American enough to accept the concept that you have the right to say what you did in your post.

I always get a big kick out of «free speech» sloganeers who think «free speech» means they are somehow immune from the consequences of what they say.

I love free speech but, those in positions of authority who advocate hate, bigotry and acts of violence against others should be held criminally accountable for what they say.

They can implement what policies they want; the First Amendment only protects us against government abridgement of free speech.

The only point I'm having a bit of trouble with is... «we should protect free speech * no matter what the cost *»

What most Westerners don't understand is that people who have grown up under the Sharia Law and in the Middle East do not understand the concept of free speech.

We may not agree with what is expressed, but we should protect free speech no matter what the cost — anything less is bowing to tyranny.

Some U.S. officials spoke to the tension between U.S. support for free speech and what some have described as the film's «hate speech,» in reacting to the attacks.

«What about free speech?

You don't have free speech if everyone can only say what isn't offensive to anyone.

That's the whole point of free speech — you are protected in saying what you want without the threat of physical violence.

In my view heaven exists, God exists and while Stephen Hawking can exercise his free speech and think I find it so strange that he spends so much time trying to disprove «what he believes does not exist».

what happens when you try to facilitate free speech / freedom of press and just plain honesty in a catholic country?

As for your point on free speech... I guess instead of having any rules we should abolish any and all rules... sounds like that is what you want anyway.

You said:» As for your point on free speech... I guess instead of having any rules we should abolish any and all rules... sounds like that is what you want anyway.

«What I'm pleased about coming second is, is what an endorsement of free speWhat I'm pleased about coming second is, is what an endorsement of free spewhat an endorsement of free speech.

Hi David, Just a note that even though I am in California, I have contacted top Canadian free speech legal experts about what this US group is doing to you and the you've been «warned» part.

What the atheist did might be tasteless, however, free speech needs to be protected.

The atheist has the right to free speech to what ever degree he is willing to go and the muslim has the right to get mad and to protest the atheist's view.

Do you see what they are doing that a man that wants to run a business the way he wants has a terror gay organization trying to limit his free speech - LIE, it's people who are trying to fighting for the equal civil rights of gays.

What happens to free speech and us being able to speak our mind without ridicule»

Chick - fil - A spokesman dies amid furor over same - S e marriage Do you see what they are doing that a man that wants to run a business the way he wants has a terror gay organization trying to limit his free speech as well as the city of Chicago wanting to limit him on business permits and saying he cant get a license to run his business and falsely stop a business from going forward.

«Do you see what they are doing that a man that wants to run a business the way he wants has a terror gay organization trying to limit his free speech as well as the city of Chicago wanting to limit him on business permits and saying he cant get a license to run his business and falsely stop a business from going forward.

Free speech only works for people who have enough brains to understand what is being said.

Why is it that lately it seems that if somebody proclaims to be Christian and to hold onto those beliefs it's a problem because somebody else thinks differently and that they believe because you share what you believe that you are forcing it on somebody else but if a non-Christian tells a Christian that they ought to be quiet or tells the Christian that they are wrong it's okay and it's free speech.