Sentences with phrase «what game reviewers»

Not exact matches

By giving Gears of War 3 such a high average score, reviewers are setting the bar low for what a great game should be and are doing a disservice to an industry that is struggling to be taken seriously by the mainstream.

When looking for games, Kim Vandenbroucke, game reviewer at The Game Aisle, a toy industry blog, recommends finding one «with an engaging theme that will entice boys to open the box and find out what the game is about.&ragame reviewer at The Game Aisle, a toy industry blog, recommends finding one «with an engaging theme that will entice boys to open the box and find out what the game is about.&raGame Aisle, a toy industry blog, recommends finding one «with an engaging theme that will entice boys to open the box and find out what the game is about.&ragame is about.»

what most reviewer don't tell is that chasing aurora is a really really fun local multiplayer game.

Don't belelive in hype and don't belelive in what all of those so called game reviewers say.

What some reviewers have written about this fact is true but it makes you try harder next time around... with a little more angst in the bat to compensate:) and put more game in you to beat the developers at their game.

DO NOT listen to what the reviewers have to say about this game.

Compared to what Mario Party 8 received, Mario Party 9 is generally considered to be a better game according to the added averages among reviewers.

Many fans and «professional» reviewers alike have gained a good amount of expectations in regards to what the game could possibly give to them after a 4 year long hiatus.

This has all been pre-release game time, but Ubisoft was nice enough to arrange some multiplayer sessions that I was able to join with reviewers from other outlets, so I have not had nearly as much time with the multiplayer aspects as I would like, but what I was able to experience was top notch.

Basically, without going into too much detail, many reviewers criticised this turn - based strategy game for not being able to tell what the enemy will do considering they move at the exact same time as you.

Not to discredit the reviewer, but he forgot to go into detail about what makes a Silent Hill game a Silent Hill game; the story.

Video game reviewer Rory Appleton plays «What Remains of Edith Finch,» which was released Tuesday, April 25, 2017.

A.J. Maciejewski (crazyaejay): I understand what you mean and I'm sorry if this sounds arrogant but completing this enormous game then reviewing it is a lot more than many other reviewers can say they did.

I also don't understand what the reviewer means by «uninspired Lvl - Design», as this game offers quite entertaining, varied, recognizeable and polished stage - designs.

To be a hundred percent honest, you are playing a numbers game with Amazon reviews, and you don't care what's IN those reviews (unless they're ALL terrible, which probably means something's wrong with your book, not the reviewers).

No matter what you do you're never exactly sure why your latest game succeeded or failed, what made it work or not work in the eyes of the reviewers.

Now if you based all your purchasing on reviewers than what you need to do is find those you trust, not a site but a reviewer and when it's not the guy you trust you need to read the pros & cons of the game and decide from that whether the game is for you or not.

That is where these games show courage, and I think also that is what is very much appreciated by reviewers who have to play the same kind of games over and over.

A lot of gamers and reviewers were disappointed with the ending of what was otherwise a truly magnificent game.

Im buying the game regardless of what reviewers say, never cared for other peoples opinions.

To try and explain what I mean: Sega - 16 has various reviewers and their goal is to review all 16 - bit (and now 8 - bit) Sega games.

«Although it would have been nice to have a bit more variety, and a longer story without any glitches, Tacoma uses strong voice acting, colorful characters, and an interesting game premise to more than makeup for what it lacks,» our reviewer concluded.

What can we say, we're excited to see reviewers enjoying the game!

That's likely what it is — they may have intended for the game to be available for reviewers to redeem their vouchers (i.e. not visible to the public) but must've selected the wrong settings by mistake.

Obviously with so many different reviewers on TVL, each with different opinions on what makes a good game, some are going to be a bit more harsh / generous than others.

I actually think the parts of playing the «ball» game actually sounds fun, contrary to what this reviewer's experience was.

While reviewer Ryan McCafferey praised the game's graphics and tone, he wasn't impressed by the rest of what the game had to offer, specifically saying it outstays its welcome.

The first trailer is the official launch trailer for the game, and the second trailer is an accolades trailer, so you can see what reviewers are saying about the game.

*** «What does make it a failure is if they were unable to capitalise on the changes to the point where simply meeting the status - quo would have been a better game... and quite frankly from the review it doesn't sound like that» *** *** «I «am no fan of the series nor do I really care about the games, but I do care when a reviewer (especially from a site with influence) out - rightly pushes an agenda rather than seeing the game for what it is.&raWhat does make it a failure is if they were unable to capitalise on the changes to the point where simply meeting the status - quo would have been a better game... and quite frankly from the review it doesn't sound like that» *** *** «I «am no fan of the series nor do I really care about the games, but I do care when a reviewer (especially from a site with influence) out - rightly pushes an agenda rather than seeing the game for what it is.&rawhat it is.»

What could Team Ninja or this game have possibly done to the reviewer to warrant such outright flaming?

Too me it appears clear that the reviewer saw the game for what it is and apparently thought it was «awful» hence the 3/10.

To be honest I never read reviews, I» rather go from what my friends advise or buy the game to see for myself, theirs a lot of back stage sniggering when it comes to reviewers and their opinions, maybe they had a bad expirence with a developer previously, whatever the case may be buy the game and stop your moaning!

I «am no fan of the series nor do I really care about the games, but I do care when a reviewer (especially from a site with influence) out - rightly pushes an agenda rather than seeing the game for what it is.

If I was a Professional reviewer I would give this game a: Funfactor - 10 This is what is selling the game for me.

I appreciate that reviewers are using the full 10 score now and rating bad games under a 5.0 Not sure if this game deserves it though, well we have to just wait and see what everyone thinks.

Well, it looks like the public either don't care what the reviewers say and buy it anyway, with the slightly ignorant (and probably nonsense) notion on - board that if you've bought a game for # 45 you're likely to perceive it to have a somewhat higher set of qualities, or — you know — it's not actually as bad as everyone's saying.

I see what you're saying, but the point is that this is still a serious gaming news & review website, and their journalists just made a completely dumb comparison which is not only unjust towards a game, it portrays a level of unprofessionalism (is that even a word) in the article itself, as these reviewers are supposed to at least know what they're talking about.

I don't know how reviewers will grade those games because they're so unique and so different to what the reviewers have played with controllers.

To test it, I've played with a fellow reviewer and the online feature is similar to what ever fighting game has.

While a locked 60 FPS is always preferable, a fair few games ship with what reviewers dub a «locked 60 FPS» when the reality is anything but.

In order to give reviewers an idea of what they can do with crystals in the new Marvel Comics action RPG Future Fight, developer Netmarble provided special builds packed with more than $ 9,000 worth of in - game currency.

Other reviewers have been singing Patapon's praises for a couple of weeks now, but I noticed that none of them accurately describe what the game is actually about.

What I've found most difficult to believe is that after playing the demo from E3, reviewers were surprised that the game didn't

A game review is simply an evaluation of a game based on it's own merits, not it's goals or the circumstances that surround it because there is no reliable means for a reviewer to know what exactly the original intentions of a game were or are.

What I've found most difficult to believe is that after playing the demo from E3, reviewers were surprised that the game didn't have more to it.

I would think that a pretty fundamental qualification for a game reviewer would be to very quickly grasp the systems at play in a game and understand what it's trying to go for and how well it achieves that.

There are 4 gameplay modes; Elf the tiny dog is back to help you get into tight places; there's a new «Gift of Sight» element and I agree with other reviewers that it's a bit clunky but it does provide some answers in a «this is what really happened» way; hidden objects are presented in a variety of ways; puzzles and mini games are pretty good even though it might take a minute to figure out what you're supposed to do.

Usually these games have embargo times, where the publishers give the reviewers restrictions on what they can and can not share before the game releases.

Reviewer's Tilt: I believe that Ocarina 3D still earns a spot on the short list of the «best 3DS games» out there; the evolution of the nostalgic graphics was enough to sell most of the hardcore fans long ago, but the addition of bonus features and the unique 3DS functionality are what make it one of the most well - designed re-makes published in years, for any console.

It's amazing that modern day reviewers are respecting the game for what it is — tight gameplay — and not ripping too hard on what it is not — tons of content, upgrading, AAA graphics, etc..