Sentences with phrase «what gets more votes»

I have always said that there must only be one standard to government decision making — what makes Canada more prosperous — not what gets more votes.

Not exact matches

They're focusing on small actions — what teenagers can do to get more involved, including registering to vote and writing to lawmakers.

What's more, to get legislation through Congress relying only on Republican votes, the majority must rely on reconciliation instructions contained in a budget resolution.

It is more of a convenience to lie get 20 % of the vote, than what they actually believe.

To finish, religion and government should be completely separated, religion should be private and should not be discussed / debated to get more votes and they should stick to what really matters which is getting the economy back on track, getting people jobs, and getting corruption out of businesses / government.

Ashes or no ashes... whichever gets more votes is what they'll do.

There is no other correct answer for who should be getting the most votes, because what Harper has done over the past month or so is more superhero origin story than it is baseball.

Me asking why Seo would be preferred to play on the right rather than left got more up votes than down and considering I get down votes for my arrogance... I would not say the question I asked is clear for everyone, or if it is then it is in favor of what I asked.

A few days ago I asked on Instagram what type of content you'd like to see more of here on BWL and «real life» content got the most votes.

I think activists can work to get Greens and Respect elected in a handful of FPTP seats and we must all hope for an embarrassingly massive Tory landslide (300 seats or so) on < 50 % of the vote that will make everyone see what an absurd situation we are in, make Cameron's parliamentary party more unruly and nekedly nasty and — crucially — smash the Labour Party so hard that both its right and its left give up all hope of ever winning a FPTP election again, and destroy the hubris that decrees that they never collaborate with other progressive / left forces.

We have no idea what they want; how to bring them back to the conversation; how to get them to vote Labour once more.

What I don't get is why did they win when under the party totals, Labor clearly had nearly 800,000 more votes in the party totals as compared to the Liberal National Party?

I don't put much store in opinion polls, but if true it would only indicate roughly what you would expect to happen at this point in the parliament - 32 % isn't that much lower than Labour got in the 2005 General Election and all it would suggest is that the Liberal Democrats are having a reversal - tactical voting could see them holding onto many of their current seats, indeed it is even possible that if they got 17 % of the vote that if it focused in an area that they could actually end up with more seats, where the switches in support are occuring is crucial - if they are focused then if the Conservative Party were to get 39 % then it might still result in them getting fewer seats than Labour or in extremis winning a 150 seat majority or so?

If councillors and MPs knew they would get votes by paying attention to what happens inside prisons, and most importantly what happens when people are released, they might be more likely to consider the effectiveness of this often neglected area of public policy.

The irony however was that the votes of the PFP, which was the bigger of the two, and the UNC, put together, was more than what the PNP got.

Clegg has put his authority on the line and the votes suggest that his party want five more years in power and know what they have to do — or stomach — to ensure they get them.

What is more, democratically speaking why should these people have their votes counted again and again while Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat supporters only get their vote counted once?

Electorally, Thompson's chances seem grim: He's down by sixteen points; an expected low turnout puts Thompson at a deeper disadvantage by making it more costly to draw out votes, say political analysts; Bloomberg is readying what the campaign promises to be the «largest get - out - the - vote operation in the history of municipal politics»; and the mayor's also cut into Thompson's potential labor support, depriving him of ground troops.

Not sure, if this is undetAnd, labour spent more than the Tories in 2005 75 % of labours spending in 1997 came from the private side, and recall 1979 when the closed shop meant everyone had to joina Union, that union had to give money to the labour party, we knew the next election would be the most vicious since 1992 ′ we win the campaign, lost the election that time, The Tory press isn't as strong as it was then, the tories haven't got lost of «extremist» stories about labour they had thrn to smear us now, They're a smaller party not just cos of Ukip, But labour has a lot of keen strong members, and it'll come doen to 70 or so marginal seats what happens, while not losing our working class votes in Newcastle, birmingham Luton Rotherham, Scotland, and if they're not abstaining, or voting Ukip, we have to ask why they're voting tory

«Clearly, Cuomo and the Assembly Democrats who voted against our amendment are more concerned about appeasing the public sector unions that get them elected than they are about doing what is right for the developmentally disabled.»

Robert regarding your view that labour cold win with 35 %, yes, but we won in 1974 ′ with 37 % and I believe Callaghan actually got a few more votes in 79 ′ than 74 although the percentage was the me, the point was that the 74 manifesto was so far from what the public felt, that the following election lots of liberals or stay at home voters came out and the Tories would get 13 + million for the next f our.

Last week Zephyr Teachout lost to Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic gubernatorial primary, but not without taking 34 percent of the vote, more than what most people thought she'd get.

Wherever you stand politically, Professor Patrick Dunleavy explains how to use both your votes to get more of what you want.

Reforms being discussed include introducing term limits, giving members more say in what bills get a vote, and banning or limiting outside income.

What the data says about Europe's lurch to the right If the economy gets better and more people turn out to vote, support for the more extreme parties will shrink in two to three years, say analysts

A few days ago I asked on Instagram what type of content you'd like to see more of here on BWL and «real life» content got the most votes.

It's double the size of what the Foreign committees have to get through each year but there's more members voting.

If you like what you see please help Race the Sun get on Steam by voting on our Greenlight page In my last post I talked about our multiplayer system and... Read More

Franchesca fred or who ever when WILL the eu uk get loads of themes like the usa gets each week we just get 1 theme but we get loads of avatars this has got to change i dnt care if the eu has rules on what themes get added i vote that the rules get torn up and we get loads of themes each week or just do what you did with ps3 avatars any themes we bought on ps3 gets added to ps4 store so we can download our ps3 themes to ps4 for free then add new themes a week im not moaning i just want to see more ps4 themes i hope sony reads this and adds loads of themes soon to eu uk ps store

Well that's what you get by voting in those who promised to do just that and more.

So, what Unconvicted was was it was my attempt to make the process as easy as possible for people with old convictions to be able to vote, be able to get their firearm rights back, be able to serve on juries, and more simply, and more down to earth just be able to get good jobs, get access to federal funding for school.

What unconvicted was was it was my attempt to make the process as easy as possible for people with old convictions to be able to vote, be able to get their firearm rights back, be able to serve on jury's, more simply and more down to earth, just be able to get good jobs, get access to federal funding for school.

«What the NDP would like to do is move to a card - only system so, if a union is capable of getting more than 50 per cent of the employees from the bargaining unit to sign cards, there would be an automatic certification without a vote,» says Michael Howcroft, partner with Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP in Vancouver.

Politicians need votes and will do what it takes to get those votes, get elected — and with more and more (eg.

When the members of the British Columbia Real Estate Association (BCREA) cast a ballot this summer to determine whether to dissolve the association plus its 11 associated boards in favour of a new provincewide professional standards entity called Realtors of B.C., the vote may be more about what Realtors are willing to sacrifice to get organized real estate to a new, more efficient destination.

I'm getting ready to paint my kitchen island to bring in a bit more color and personality, so you know what I would vote for!!