Sentences with phrase «what gives the event»

And this is exactly what gives the event of Christ its eschatological significance.

Not exact matches

In other words, because VR lets reporters, photographers, and videographers create a simulated version of a specific event, it could easy let them distort what happened and give a false impression of that event.

In social situations, I ask myself how I want to be perceived and what my goals are for any given event.

Accordingly, no assurances can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward - looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what impact they will have on the results of operations or financial condition of Oracle or Vocado.

About an hour ago, Torsten Sløk at Deutsche Bank circulated a note that gave an overview of what the firm thought could happen, and in the broadest strokes here's what DB put on the table in the event of a «Leave» victory:

Events like today's market debut are what entrepreneurs dream about, even if, during waking hours, they give lip service to just wanting to solve people's problems or save sea lions.

Some researchers suggest that gossip not only gives people a better idea of what's going on around them in their social circles and at work, but also helps people feel more involved in events.

THURSDAY, JANUARY 11 NEW YORK - Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley gives keynote before event «U.S. Economic Outlook: What's In Store For 2018» organized by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association 2030 GMT.

You'll discover 4 key steps to get such high enrollment and why live events are one of the most effective ways to tend and befriend influencers that give you access to large groups of people keen to buy what you have.

The FDA has approved the world's first CAR - T therapy, giving a green light to Novartis for Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) in what regulators themselves describe as an historic event.

This type of unpredictable event gives credence to the adage of «raise all the money you can when you can because you never know what's going to happen» (and people said that long before September 11, 2001).

This year's theme is, «What's in Store for NYC Retail,» and Michael Goldban of Brookfield Office Properties, Brad Mendelson of Colliers International and Richard Wagman of Madison Capital will give speeches at the event.

As of right now, T - Mobile hasn't given out details or said what it intends to present at the show, but it's expected that it'll be a lively event where Legere will showcase new services, plans and such.

Give - a-Way Event: When: June 4th, Thursday, @ 6:45 PM Where: Exhibit Hall RxAdvance booth # 803 What: Mercedes car or winner can donate to the charity of winner's choice in the name of winner.

We promised another article about peer - to - peer trading, but given the events of yesterday, when the Winklevoss Twins had their Bitcoin ETF denied and panic selling ensued, it's a good time to talk about what to do when the prices drop sharply in a short period of time.

Mr Cameron was asked what he thought about Jesus» command to sell all we have and give it to the poor by a member of the public at an event in the Chilterns,...

Other possible dates are May 18, John Paul's birthday, or October 16, the anniversary of the date he was elected pope in 1978, Tornielli said, suggesting the last date is most likely, to give the church time to prepare what will be an enormous event, even by the Vatican's standards.

hey G, I am acquainted with your theory there... it is called Preterism... it is the standard interpretation of Revelation given by liberals... I walked away from that belief and the church I was raised in when I found out what they are teaching... Nope, the book of revelation is not a «code» for the events of the day at the time of the fall of Jerusalem.

@Mike — I can't figure out what you mean given your ongoing Oz like intepretation of events.

But here, too, there is little that is actually new, although there is detail that confirms what shrewder observers of Vatican life pieced together after the events of early 2013: that Benedict XVI's poorly - planned 2012 visit to Mexico and Cuba convinced him that he could no longer travel; that he believed the Pope must be present at World Youth Day 2013 in Brazil, a conviction that became the terminus ad quem driving the timing of the abdication and what immediately preceded it; and that, contrary to speculations that have become more lurid over time, Benedict's concern about his increasingly frailty, which fuelled his concern that he would be increasingly unable to give the Church what she deserved from a pope, was the sole motive behind his decision to renounce the Oice of Peter — not Vatileaks, not concerns about financial and other corruptions inside the Leonine Wall, not blackmail.

Having said this, however, we must also notice what ought in any event to have been obvious: that the several gospels are collections of brief tales, remembered incidents, bits of sayings, and the like, all gathered together in the interest of giving what St. Mark's opening words so well describe: «the beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ the Son of God» — the account of the historical happenings, as the Christian community remembered them, which gave rise to the faith that Jesus is the promised Messiah and the divine Lord.

Above all, Christian worship is rejoicing in what Christ has done for us, a form of God's self - giving in which the historical events are again offered to us.

[1] There is nothing beyond what I see, nothing underlying what I feel, nothing that promises more than what I have... Things, events, relationships, have no more meaning than what I choose to give them.

Not all events involve a mind, but some do, and it may be that what gives the character and creative advance [sic] to the whole of nature and every part of nature is that there is operative throughout the whole of nature a Mind.

Only someone who overlooks the fact that this answer itself has a real history which is a history of the reality reflected on as well as of the reflection itself, can think that the Church with its principles, because they too can be given concrete form, is always able to follow directly on the heels of what is new in the changing course of history and that only by its own fault and failure could the Church lag behind events in its theological reflection on morals.

The events they describe could logically have been otherwise, although causally they could be only what they are They could not have been otherwise given their causal antecedents, and since the causal antecedents could not causally have been otherwise, there never were any open possibilities for the state of affairs in question other than the one which does in fact occur.

To the person who heard that word of wisdom as with all words of prophecy I would encourage you to bring it to God and see what he says - sometimes people get things wrong but also sometimes the words given can be about events not now but to come

More than a third of the whole is given to the events of Jesus» last week in Jerusalem, which shows what he certainly thought to be most important.

What Heidegger seems to suggest, comments Macquarrie, is that the discovery of truth is not just the result of human striving, does not involve ridding the psyche of all distorting influences so as to hear the truth plainly, but is an event «above and beyond our willing and doing» in which Being gives itself to be known.

It is simply that, given our different views of human nature, human freedom, ecclesiastical authority, and the significance of historical events, we simply differ on what makes religious sense.

If our human existence is not that of some supposedly substantial and indestructible soul to whom experiences happen, but is rather those experiences themselves held together in unity and given identity by the awareness and self - awareness which makes it possible for us to say «I» and «you», then the enduring reality, which God accepts and values, is precisely that series of events or occasions which go to make us what we are.

The fact is that Abelard was trying to say, with his own passionate awareness of what love can mean in human experience, that in Jesus, God gave us not so much an example of what we should be like but — and this is the big point in his teaching — a vivid and compelling demonstration in a concrete event in history that God does love humanity and will go to any lengths to win from them their glad and committed response.

But God, from among the countless number of possibilities, as it were selects one which is then a «given» for an event or particular occasion; this is what Whitehead would call an «initial aim» which the occasion may then adopt for its own and towards the actualizing of which, in concrete fashion, it may work.

If the meaning of our principle of historical aetiology, as opposed to an eye - witness report by someone who was himself present at the event, has been understood, we presumably also possess a criterion for judging what was correct in the description given by traditional theology of the blessed, supernatural, original condition of man, as opposed to what was a simplified projection into the past, into human beginnings, of the state of man as it ought to be and will be in the future.

It is important in this connection to distinguish very clearly within each tradition between its fundamental unity and the unity of harmonization, fruit of the «Biblical» spirit, «between saga produced near the historical occurrences, the character of which is enthusiastic report, and saga which is further away from the historical event, and which derives from the tendency to complete and round off what is already given.»

For in such an analysis, what is disclosed is that we are in truth a certain direction or routing of events which, because of a persisting memory of what has occurred along it, and because there has emerged (at some point in the evolutionary development so far as our own species is concerned) an awareness which includes both consciousness and self - consciousness, may meaningfully be given a specific identity.

«God is Love», says the first letter of St. John, summing up in that simple three - word phrase the conviction to which the primitive Christian community had come when it thought about, meditated upon, responded to, and in profound acceptance came to grasp what indeed God was «up to» in that crucial event which took place at a given moment in history.

-- forgetting that ancient religious writers, unlike scholarly historians, did not as a rule feel it incumbent upon them to give, in a footnote or otherwise, their source for every anecdote or event, or to anticipate the modern reader's constant query, «How can we know that what you say is true, in every detail?»

In any event, they have made their film, and while they haven't completely abandoned what they know about moviemaking, they have clung tightly to the image of Jesus given them by a Sister Josephine — or in Schrader's case, someone like the harsh father in his movie Hardcore.

We mean, first, that through what God has accomplished in the events which came to their climax in the life of Jesus our human existence has been given a new structure.

When it seemed clear that he was expected to give a speech, he stood up and mentioned what we had discussed on our afternoon walk: that this was something of a historical event, the last of the old - style missionaries, and that to him it meant that now the church was 100 per cent on its own for indigenous leadership.

What historical criticism can give us concerning the events of sacred history mirrored in the Bible is a knowledge of probability, not certainty.

For one, the universe may only appear to have order, just as causation may only appear to actually exist, when in fact any given event may be said to have unlimited causes and we only limit are decision on what «truly» caused something to GIVE order to the universe — think about all the finger pointing that goes on every time something unexpected happens.

What was the course of events which gave rise to the Christian faith in the period of approximately twenty years between the death of Jesus and the writing of the earliest New Testament documents, the letters of Paul?

Now the northern tribes request that David assume rule over them; and a narrator gives us his own and what he obviously believes also to be David's interpretation of the whole astonishing sequence of events:

The faith in God is supremely acted out in worship; and for a Christian loyal to the Christian community that worship is of «God the Father,» manifested in what through the Self - Expression (and for us supremely in the event of Jesus Christ) God has done, is doing, and will do in the creation, and given response through the working of the Holy Spirit, enabling the world and humans within it to say their Amen to God's initiating activity.

Darwin proposed a gradual process for speciation and given what was known at the time, it wasn't expected to be an observable event.

And if this is so — and we are sure we have succeeded in proving that it is — if the one remaining event (i.e. the fact of Christ) disappears, and the ground of history gives way under our feet, what can prevent Bultmann's thought from disintegrating into philosophy?

This is such a huge subject that I must beg indulgence, therefore, if I give my space to but a small fraction of the historic faith — namely its main emphases on God, Christ, the Church, and eternal life — and consider only these in our modem context, in the effort to discover what values they may have for men and women who are tossed about in an unsettled world, with an uncertain future, and doomed — almost certainly it seems — to a doubtful truce of arms, at worst to a war which threatens to annihilate man as we have known him and in any event to leave us a bare existence such as we can eke out on a totally devastated planet.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!