Sentences with phrase «what global warming alarmists»

In other words, the more we learn the more we see that everything is unusual compared to what the global warming alarmists predict.

Nope that is not what the global warming alarmists are saying.

Not exact matches

In a column titled «In 2008, a 100 Percent Chance of Alarm,» he exposes the Chicken Littles for what they are — opportunists and alarmists who in this new year «will bring you image after frightening image of natural havoc linked to global warming.»

He withdrew any kind of bipartisan support for an ETS (and more)» «two years ago Canadians gave majority government to Stephen Harper's Conservatives, who were pledged to a sensible use of its resources, so Australians have now elected a government with a pragmatic attitude on global warming» «Led by Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, an attempt was made, by what can only be described as alarmists, to exploit these fires for the purposes of the global warming debate.

Here is what I actually said: ``... the climate alarmists maintain that Africa is already experiencing natural disasters — principally floods, droughts, malaria and other diseases, arising from unnatural global warming, and that these are causing increases in poverty, malnutrition, disease and environmental damage.

What if the expertise of global warming alarmists is undeniable but the injury they seek to prevent can be compared to a trip and fall hazard faced by all of humanity caused by a difference of one - quarter inch in elevation between a parking lot and a sidewalk in front of a Mississippi Walmart?

What can you point to that will lead any of global warming alarmists that are still left question to question their faith?

That essentially is what Dr. Tim Ball was saying when he took heat for comparing the tactics of global warming alarmists to those of Nadolf Nitler.

The bad news is that as more is understood about global warming, and as we compare what has happened to what was predicted by the average models (from the actual science, not from popular sensationalized media), the earlier scientific predictions have turned out to be too conservative, not as you say «too alarmist».

All or part of what passes among Alarmists as «global warming» could be the result of interactions among myriad phenomena that redistribute temperatures.

What will the global warming alarmist do?

The plan by climate alarmists to have other scientists imprisoned for their «global warming» skepticism is backfiring horribly, and the chief alarmist is now facing a House investigation into what has been called «the largest science scandal in US history.»

This is what happens when you send people from liberal Brown University, who conveniently come up with another scare - a-rama about global warming, in what appears to be another feeble «alarmist» attempt to counter climategate and all the other «gates» since.

Global warming alarmists often exploit the determination of what is happening along a shoreline or on ocean islands.

Again proving that alarmist science is based on scientific untruths, speculation and hype, two new studies confirm what objective scientists have actually observed: recent past global warming is not causing an increase on severe storms.

What other alarmist predictions, exaggerated claims and catastrophic projections are you fed in order to push the global warming agenda?

And I assume the Sierra Club would issue a public retraction if confronted with the facts that the data are precisely as I described that over the last 18 years there has been no significant warming and indeed that is why global warming alarmists invented the term «the pause» to explain what they called the pause in global warming because the data demonstrate what you just said, that the Earth is cooking and warming, is not back up by the data.

From what I've read in the limited material online... I was particularly amused by section 7.1, entitled «Global Warming Alarmists» (sounds quite objective!)

What all these papers argue in their different ways is that the alarmist version of global warming — aka Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW)-- is a fake artglobal warming — aka Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW)-- is a fake arwarming — aka Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW)-- is a fake artGlobal Warming (CAGW)-- is a fake arWarming (CAGW)-- is a fake artefact.

He explained a lot on his way out the door about what motivates the global warming alarmists, admitting in his resignation letter that global warming isn't science — it's religion: «For me the protection of Planet Earth, the survival of all species and sustainability of our ecosystems is more than a mission.

As more and more scientists defect from the crumbling alarmist bandwagon, however, critics say the hysterical shrieking and dangerous rhetoric from politicians only serve to further illustrate the accelerating collapse of what many climate experts refer to as the «global - warming hoax.»

What we will find is that, extrapolating from history, it is almost impossible to get warming numbers as high as those quoted by global warming alarmists.

What really concerns me is that the climate alarmists may be right, but they are too freaking weak, incompetent and dishonest to convince about 7 billion people that global warming is a big problem.