Sentences with phrase «what good criticism»

They do exactly what good criticism does — supply a new context for the familiar and unfamiliar alike.

Not exact matches

Following a groundswell of criticism, Uber's executives promised a thorough examination of what had happened and said that they would do better.

He's also fended off less ridiculous criticisms around quotas and affirmative action; he says the «what if the best qualified people are men?»

What this means for you: It might feel great to get good feedback, but constructive criticism is crucial too.

But focusing on their achievements apart from that criticism will ensure that employees don't miss out on feedback that encourages them to continue doing what they do well.

Unlike constructive criticism, positive feedback lets employees know they're on the right track and motivates them to continue doing what they're doing well.

In one way, it's a fast and useful way to get feedback about what you're doing well and constructive criticism about what you can be doing better.

@Christine, Points well - made; your criticisms are indeed valid in some respects, arguably way off in others, but I get the gist of what you're saying.

Because I will shortly offer some criticisms of Robert Jewett's effort, I want to begin by acknowledging what is good and important in a work that culminates a long career devoted to the study of Paul.

For anyone interested in what chic academic criticism looks and feels like today, Institutions of Modernism is as good a place to start as any.

Matthew Yglesias has gotten some criticism for celebrating Clinton for being «more comfortable than the average person with violating norms and operating in legal gray areas,» and for being the kind of person who «believes in asking what she can get away with rather than what would look best.»

The answer is that theology is a very human, and very important, enterprise; that grasping and assimilating what God has done and continues to do is not something that can be engaged in passively but is a challenge to everything any of us possesses; that the separation of theologizing from what the minister and the church try, fallibly but authentically, to hear of the Word of God in specific situations from some alleged and remote theology is bound to be blasphemous as well as mistaken; and that the one way to hear the Word of God, if it contains the Protestant principle, is to submit our functions to concrete self - criticism.

It has been the case time and time again in your comments that you can do no better than criticize what you perceive as the «tone» of my criticisms of your religion of your murderous god, rather than the content.

I need to be careful with my criticisms though, I provide a lot more detail to what I take exception too than what I found valuable, I really do mean it when I say overall it was a good read.

Could we have a better account of what, according to form criticism, was the normal process of transmission of the gospel tradition in its oral period?

If you properly engage in this work, you will be interested in arriving at a position on whatever it is that interests you (philosophy, critical theory, history, philology, literary criticism, or whatever) that is preferable to any other that you know of on that question, and you will concomitantly want to be clear as to what the position that you construct and defend is, what it excludes, how best to show that its competitors are less adequate than the one you want to defend, and in what sense this is true.

But from what I gather reading some of NP's latest posts, I'd say a lot of criticism is well deserved.

However, if you want pointed criticisms into the weaknesses of Christianity and what others think of Christian religiosity, this blog is one of the best.

Historical criticism is quite compatible with warm appreciation, and to be a biblical critic does not imply anything adverse any more than it does to be a music critic or literary critic, who would be useless unless he had the capacity for appreciating what is good in his field.

The third thing to remember when giving criticism is to speak of what has been done well.

For example, I don't know what sort of evidence or criticism could be brought to bear on Mr. Farrow's claim that only sexual difference, and not sexual orientation, is fundamental to human well - being.

No matter what you think about his politics, it's hard to deny that President Obama's sense of humor — and his ability to be a good sport in the face of some criticism — made for some pretty entertaining television...

Ironically, the very fact the bishops are making these «bold» statements is a testament to Israel's essential decency and humanity» the bishops know there will be no serious consequences or massive reprisals against Christians in Israel for «speaking out,» whereas any similar Christian criticism» or even questioning» of an Arab government in the region, or Islamic extremism, would» well, we all saw what happened after Regensburg.

Although my reflections will relate specifically to the literary criticism of the Gospels, much of what I will say applies equally well to the other New Testament literature and to the Hebrew Bible.

Because this is the sole ideal that has the solidity once owned by Catholicism and the flexibility that this was never able to have, the only one that can always face the future and does not claim to determine it in any particular and contingent form, the only one that can resist criticism and represent for human society the point around which, in its frequent upheavals, in its continual oscillations, equilibrium is perpetually restored, so that when the question is heard whether liberty will enjoy what is known as the future, the answer must be that it has something better still: it has eternity.29

Well, well, well, I said it a while ago, familiarity breeds contempt, With the Arse, Wenger seems to have this adage well kept, No criticisms, no view from different perspectives, Just the same old ass narratives, Say what, some's got ta give, oh believe that my fellow gooners, That old geezer plus his henchmen have to find a way to give in to the swelling tide, Otherwise the tide will sweep his sad self and his henchmen aside, Someday, SomeWell, well, well, I said it a while ago, familiarity breeds contempt, With the Arse, Wenger seems to have this adage well kept, No criticisms, no view from different perspectives, Just the same old ass narratives, Say what, some's got ta give, oh believe that my fellow gooners, That old geezer plus his henchmen have to find a way to give in to the swelling tide, Otherwise the tide will sweep his sad self and his henchmen aside, Someday, Somewell, well, I said it a while ago, familiarity breeds contempt, With the Arse, Wenger seems to have this adage well kept, No criticisms, no view from different perspectives, Just the same old ass narratives, Say what, some's got ta give, oh believe that my fellow gooners, That old geezer plus his henchmen have to find a way to give in to the swelling tide, Otherwise the tide will sweep his sad self and his henchmen aside, Someday, Somewell, I said it a while ago, familiarity breeds contempt, With the Arse, Wenger seems to have this adage well kept, No criticisms, no view from different perspectives, Just the same old ass narratives, Say what, some's got ta give, oh believe that my fellow gooners, That old geezer plus his henchmen have to find a way to give in to the swelling tide, Otherwise the tide will sweep his sad self and his henchmen aside, Someday, Somewell kept, No criticisms, no view from different perspectives, Just the same old ass narratives, Say what, some's got ta give, oh believe that my fellow gooners, That old geezer plus his henchmen have to find a way to give in to the swelling tide, Otherwise the tide will sweep his sad self and his henchmen aside, Someday, Someway!

Typical bias criticism, Giroud actually scores when he's given a chance and knows how to make assists, him and Ozil have the best partnership in Europe after MSN so what do you have t say now?

Most of us were on Wenger's case until very recently seeing that we didn't understand what his overall game plan [on and off the pitch] was and we had good reason to doubt him but at least the criticisms were meant to be of a constructive nature but I fail to understand folks who come on here to spew bile even when things are finally looking up for once in a very long while.

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

Per might be a good defender but i still wonder what if we had a world class defender to partner Koscielny.Look say it as it is and be truthful so as to know where to improve i will remember his great or world class performances and i will also remember his average performances.It is good to criticize a player for the right reason so that he can improve but the criticism should be constructive not destructive.To me i would have sold him if we could get another far better player i still feel Gabriel is much better than him.I can see him making the same old mistakes this season.However give a player credit where it is due.

He doesn't know how to relate to players to bring the best out of them which is what Sir Alex. Also Morinho can not take criticism in good so that he can work on his mistakes but rather has chosen to be sarcasm and cheeky response.

Contrary to what you might think, I don't actually think this is the fault of the referees — much like players who are out of their depth, it is not necessarily a criticism of them that there are none better.

hleb has moved on due to some personal reasons and we should cut the dude some slack because while he played for us, he played his heart and soul out, same goes for flamini and gilberto and henry... lets keep our criticisms on the pitch and remeber that no matter which side is wrong or who is greedy, what counts is how they performed on the pitch and they did that very well... we should be happy we do nt have players that play rubbish on the field when their hearts are not with the club or when they are not satisfied... i personally pay tribute to gilberto, flamini, adebayor (if he leaves) diarra (hope its not too late) and hleb.

Some of our best assistants simply can't handle the unknown: not knowing when or if they will be called to a birth, not knowing what clinical scenario they may face and how they may respond, not knowing when the right time to eat or sleep is, and even, not knowing if all their sacrifice will be appreciated or invite criticism.

Kindergarten is a time when what's important is being able to sit still and focus, follow directions, deal well with your peers, handle criticism, and bounce back from setbacks.

Having a summer job not only teaches about the specificity of the position at hand, but what companies expect; what jobs are more competitive than others; learning to work with others; developing a good, strong work ethic; taking criticism; and applying what was learned to their college and life experience.

Suggest what skills you feel they have that an employer would look for and always be complimentary, teenagers respond better with encouragement and flattery than nagging and criticism.

I'm so glad there are mothers like you who are prepared to stand up for what is so obviously best for their children despite society's criticisms.

The main criticism was of the failure to do any preparation for what was surely Labour's best case outcome, before the post-election period.

There is no new stimulus package from conservative - led Germany, who prefer instead to make unduly harsh — and in my opinion inappropriate — criticisms of Gordon Brown for what I and most PES party leaders consider to be a very good stimulus package.

«Where, in the context of a major reform, government announcements are so markedly at odds with current opinion in the relatively informed and serious media, there is a particularly strong public interest in up - to - date information as to the details of what is happening within the programme, so that the public may judge whether or not opposition and media criticism is well — founded.

Fortunately, lesbians are well - versed in telling misogynists what they can do with their criticism.

But what is equally fascinating, if also unmistakably contradictory, about Alhaji Banda's rather caustic criticism of Akufo - Addo's level of «wisdom» and / or «intelligence,» is that it well appears that sometime in the past, Alhaji Banda recognized enough common sense, intelligence and wisdom in Nana Akufo - Addo to prompt him to solicit the legal advice and services of the man he clearly appears to have lately fallen out with.

Phillips explained that despite criticisms laid out in the article from people he respected, he still felt the DCCC was doing what needed to be done: «People who haven't raised a dime, don't have any [campaign], they should run for school board or something, and having conversations with people saying, «You know, maybe this isn't the best fit for you,» I'm like, I agreed with some of that stuff.»

Water off a Duck's Back 12 May 2006 What's the best way to deal with criticism without becoming bitter or losing your confidence?

«What people will observe is not how many times you are criticized but how well you respond to a criticism,» he says.

I would have expected specialists in the field to be understand the criticisms better than they have and have become a bit bored with what seems to be wilful obtuseness.

While it can be difficult to receive criticism, the best thing you can do is try not to become defensive and instead listen to what your partner has to say.

Perhaps due to the choices to cover older works, they're more able than ever to produce intelligent, thoughtful, and informative criticism — while this article maligns their production value as no better than «the average Youtube video,» editing a video review to provide context via clips of the film is a step beyond what the vast majority of populist or even academic film criticism has done in the past, let alone other related films in the genre and in the director's oeuvre for context.

I don't see the point in discussing criticism, which is entirely subjective, and then couching a subjective statement like «Little Fockers isn't a better film than Killing Them Softly» in an objective manner to support what is essentially a subjective argument masquerading as an objective argument.