Sentences with phrase «what got them in trouble»

«He has a good ear to the ground and will give Giorno and the PM a no - BS view on what is happening (that's what got him in trouble in the first place).

I think what got them in trouble was an unwavering commitment to a party, a narrow definition of «values» and how they set up a narrative that inferred true Christians could only cast their ballot for the GOP.

I'm glad to see that Americans are growing more concerned about what's in their food, but BPI's lack of transparency is what got them in trouble this time

He doesn't mentioned Romney by name, but says the GOP's policies of cutting taxes on the rich and deregulation are «what got us in trouble in the first place.»

Clinging to mistakes long after they should have been laid to rest — that's what gets you in trouble.

Not exact matches

That can get you in trouble, because happiness is a function of what you expect versus what you get.

No surprise, she has trouble getting to sleep, goes through the day fatigued and is often trying to monitor what's happening in her company's manufacturing plant through the window while working on her office computer and fielding phone calls.

She says what she thinks and doesn't hold back, and sometimes it gets her in trouble.

The trouble is partly the result of the Internet bust — the Nasdaq has been tanking for months, and Williams's investors have told him he must make do with what he's got — but it's also, in a strange way, a result of his company's unlikely popularity.

Saloner's crisis requires a PR response that's general to many such eruptions: communicate what happened and why — «as much as you can tell us without getting yourself in further trouble,» Argenti says.

For example, if you opt for equity crowdfunding you can get in trouble for taking money from non-accredited investors, so what is the platform doing to ensure it is only connecting companies with legitimately vetted backers?

Because that's what gets people in the most trouble.

As Mark Twain says «It ain't what you don't know that gets you in trouble.

I've heard of these scams that people do and people end up getting in trouble for this mistake that they made and I don't want to go through this type of druma for trying to earn extra for my education.So could you please give me some feed back on this situation so I can know what is what with these people.

Take extra time to understand what you CAN NOT do so that you do not get in trouble with the law.

Market participants are looking forward to getting their first major reading on earnings from the biggest technology - sector players in the coming days, but for now, investor sentiment has been able to overcome what would ordinarily be a troubling rise in long - term bond yields that could signal a steeper move higher for interest rates in the near future.

what a company - gop, zionists, pastor graham.one can tell that this is really free country when all these mediocrees are not doing forced labor in alasca goulag.people who got america in trouble and will finish the job if they win in 2012.

But yes, I still get that sinking feeling, like I am in trouble, what have I done or said now!!

You represent the TYPICAL christian... can not comprehend what was originally said and have serious serious trouble connecting the dots and serious trouble discerning between what is evidenced and what is been rewritten a hundred times copied in differnt languages... originally written in greek... which wasn't the language of jesus but somehow the scribes met every eye witness and wrote all of it down... actually there are NO eye witness accounts in the bible so how is it that people get conned into believing this?

I'm gonna get myself in trouble here, but I believe that's what happened in the Holocaust.

You must do what God wants you to do, even if it get you in trouble with your boss, or with your coworkers.

This is what got Anders in trouble.

Actually, I think it was only partially what he actually said that got him in trouble.

What is troubling to me are professed Christians in this country who also would like to get rid of the minority that do not believe as they do.

It does not mater what color he was, and you people need to stop parroting «racism» every time something happens and one of the colored people gets caught at something that gets him / her in trouble.

I think that's far more inserting than Kim Davis getting in trouble for not doing what the law says.

That's exactly what Jesus always got in trouble for — hanging out with drunkards, sinners, prostitutes (you know, the «bad» ones).

A Christian telling me there will be judgement by their god is just one more in the myriad of voices, both present and historic, that are telling me what I should do so I don't get into trouble.

To the christians; «The troubles with unfaithful trinitarians, those who belly - up to one god times three is, they read but only into it and get very little out of what they make «go - spel - lingly» in amplifications of unblessed pleasings by the Sons of God.

If we get into trouble in our marriage do we hear God sufficiently to understand what has to be done to heal the marriage.

Athiests are not less likely to have lower morales, I have high morales and I don't believe in god but what I do believe in is civil society and the law, both make me live in civalization and prevent me from doing crimes that would get me in trouble and possibly hurt other people.

When the troubles began in January of last year, some urged him to take the initiative, to get the full story out quickly, and explain how and why the archdiocese had done what it did.

It is a world filled with trouble, and if you walk around 100 % of the time in such a state of blissful love, you're going to get hurt far more readily than if you do what he admonished to.

This function, which is of important value to society, is made more difficult if counselees must always fear that what they admit to the counselor may be extracted from him by threat of imprisonment, or if the counselor takes the attitude, openly or impliedly, «Don't tell me anything that might get either of us in trouble.»

The three so - called «comforters», arguing on the basis of the time - honored doctrine that men got what they deserved, were sure that all of Job's troubles could be adequately explained in terms of sins he must have committed.

I am not an impulsive person, and I had many questions and also some serious stumbling blocks, like the role of women in Mormonism (which I'll get to below) and what I saw as a very troubling racist history in the religion's not - so - recent past.

I've really been making an effort to think more about what I'm consuming, but the one thing that gets me in trouble is my sweet tooth.

If he makes the most of his crash course in positional awareness and smart interceptions, he could just be to us what Kante is to Chelsea and was to Leicester, a tireless and selfless midfielder who sniffs out trouble and puts out the fires before they get out of hand.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

We should be lucky if it's only about getting what others get, because if it's about other football related stuff then we are in trouble.

Bolton may be the latest person to think they can run their own shop within the WH without Trump noticing and then get in trouble when they don't do what Trump wants.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

that's what got people in trouble with insinuating we're better with sato.

te tomorrow never comes and despite the fact that Wenger has been brilliant, its time for a change now, trouble is that's where we are in a real quandary cos if wenger goes YOU KNOW we will get a manager who accepts what the board tells him and wont spend any more than Wenger, NOWAY will Klopp or Simione get involved unless there is money to spend and with our current Board that's not going to happen.

What United paid for Pogma was the biggest waste of money in the transfer market for years and you would give # 120, million to get them out of trouble.

After I done it I knew I was gonna get in trouble, so I went and told the referee what I'd done.»

If aguero gets injured city are in trouble if hazrd gets injured Chelsea are in more trouble... Who knows what will happen if your going to predict at this stage Leicester or west ham will win with Watford in Europe...

She didn't want to get her friends in trouble, and it seemed like some of the teachers knew what was going on and just looked the other way.

One thing I can think of that might explain why Im having trouble during the day and just wonder what people think; she sleeps in her moses basket but during the night she is in the room with us and during the day in her nursery on her own - I realise this might be why Im finding it difficult due to inconsistency but Im so scared to change things cus we are actually getting sleep for the first time in ages!

I do caution my Grand kids to not post photos of their babies naked laying on their tummies on a blanket because of getting into trouble too, but really, what Mom doesn't want that precious picture of their little ones in that pose?