Sentences with phrase «what got you into trouble»

Buried feelings are what get us into trouble, so by feeling and noticing your anger, you are already on your way in this process.

Not so with my preceptors and that is what got me into trouble.

But that abstract thinking may also be what gets us into trouble.

And that's what gets him into trouble.

We don't recommend it as loans are what got you into trouble in the first place.

You may think that spending on big things is what gets you into trouble with money.

«That's what got them into trouble.»

(the latter half is what gets me into trouble most of the time).

This lack of understanding is what gets them into trouble.

It's what got us into trouble in the first place!

«What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know....

As Mark Twain said, «What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know.

Frankly if more people around here deferred to other experts just every now and again, rather than arrogantly imagining that being sceptical means assuming everyone else is an idiot — which is what got you into trouble here in the first place — I think that would make it a better place.

As I recall, it was the claim that member board and CREA ethics were what got us into trouble with the Competition Bureau in the first place.

Not exact matches

This buying and reselling of debt is partly what got the banks into trouble during the recession, which is one reason regulators now force financial institutions to keep more capital on their balance sheets.

Knowing what makes you tick, and how it's likely to get you into trouble can help you monitor and correct for potential problems.

What this means is that the bank needs to consider the potential consequences of enabling America's debt addiction, and at the very least, provide a strong safety net for borrowers who get into trouble.

Do you have a basic knowledge of Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution that will at least help you see what flags might get your product or design into trouble?

What separates remarkable leaders, however, is a unique intelligence, a «street smarts,» which grounds the entrepreneurs on a moral and common sense foundation and keeps them from getting into dumb trouble.

What gets people into trouble is when they try to deduct too aggressively.

One of my favorite Mark Twain quotes is: «It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble.

Reebok got into trouble by boasting what this technology might achieve.

«That's what got me into my first trouble — telephones,» recalls Ostrofsky of his shoestring days, when it was vital to evoke the image of a thriving enterprise though only a tentative one existed.

Watching the election returns, we were reminded of the quote attributed to the American writer Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens): «It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble.

If you are spreadsheet - minded, it can also be helpful to build a model of how the company generates cash and what kind of shock has to happen to get a company into trouble.

«At some point, we as people think we're more than what we are, and that can get us into a lot of trouble,» Morell says.

You represent the TYPICAL christian... can not comprehend what was originally said and have serious serious trouble connecting the dots and serious trouble discerning between what is evidenced and what is been rewritten a hundred times copied in differnt languages... originally written in greek... which wasn't the language of jesus but somehow the scribes met every eye witness and wrote all of it down... actually there are NO eye witness accounts in the bible so how is it that people get conned into believing this?

«It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble.

One difference between a first draft and a second draft is that what you finally say has ironed out anything that might get you into trouble.

Imagine what trouble they would get into.

A Christian telling me there will be judgement by their god is just one more in the myriad of voices, both present and historic, that are telling me what I should do so I don't get into trouble.

To the christians; «The troubles with unfaithful trinitarians, those who belly - up to one god times three is, they read but only into it and get very little out of what they make «go - spel - lingly» in amplifications of unblessed pleasings by the Sons of God.

If we get into trouble in our marriage do we hear God sufficiently to understand what has to be done to heal the marriage.

But I will watch and pray for them from a far, and I will never turn them away no matter what trouble they get themselves into.

The trouble is that to make the book true to life, and I have found that life takes me up a lot of blind alleys and into dark places and trackless jungles where what I would like to have added on just doesn't get added on, and the explanations I am dying to find never appear.

because afternoons are busy; I usually just grab what's available, and that is where I can get into trouble

Watch DC vs Silva, same thing happened with DC winning but not really knowing what to do and getting himself into trouble.

The league got itself into trouble after deciding it needed a clearer definition of what is a catch.

Focusing on our own game is all Wenger has ever done, and that's exactly what keeps getting us into trouble.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

However, the anticipating throws (i.e. ones he sometimes throws blindly without reading coverage) is what is (and always has) getting Dalton into trouble.

Apart of the transfer fee which Monaco want Arsenal to up before they'll say yes, If Lemar's father will constitute the final hurdle to be crossed before Arsenal get Lermar, let Arsenal pay him then to get what they want provided by doing that will not get Arsenal into trouble with the football authorities.

That's what gets teams into trouble.

I often tell my counseling clients that «Emotions aren't bad, but it's what you do with your emotion that can get you into trouble.»

I do caution my Grand kids to not post photos of their babies naked laying on their tummies on a blanket because of getting into trouble too, but really, what Mom doesn't want that precious picture of their little ones in that pose?

Well it was the safest date since we could swim and no telling what new trouble she would get into if we waited later (and that was good timing because a few days later she bumped her head at home during a snowstorm and we were ER visitors again)!

Over the last few days we have been showing a few examples as to what we mean by their tactics such as - Excluding breastfeeding off forms when they ask about the way the baby gets fed, formula samples being sent to homes that never even signed up, Hospitals giving mothers formula samples even after they explicitly state they will be breastfeeding, Changing some words on the can to target breastfeeding mothers to buy their formula, I even tried calling into the «Lactation service» they offer for free and pretended I was having trouble with supply so asked what I should do.

I may know what happened to that and there may be somebody else by the name of baby gizmo that may have been attempting — not REALLY trying to get into trouble — certainly not trying to cause any issues.

What to do when your preschooler doesn't stay put, gets into more trouble, or continues to scream during the cooling - off period.

Make sure he knows that lying to get what you want or avoid getting into trouble is never acceptable.