Sentences with phrase «what graphs»

The phone just screams, and, coupled with the quick animations and relatively low touch latency that's a staple of newer phones, it ultimately ends up feeling much faster than what graphs or words can describe.

It's unclear what the graphs might look like if I were doing a more everyday activity.

Then we'll have a clue what your graphs are supposed to tell us.

If one trace slides 100 years relative to the other, they are out of phase — which isn't what the reality was, but is what the graphs show.

It's worth taking a few minutes to see what these graphs tell us.

well, you do have something of a point there, I've seen manacker and others (on both sides) asserting the opposite of what the graphs say.

The graphs present the data, so I have to conclude you disagree with my description of what the graphs show.

What the graphs really show is hundreds of years of red noise.

In addition there are tables and summaries explaining what the graphs display, as well as maps on the 2.5 ˚ scale.

(Side note: In case you don't know what graphs of these functions in question look like in, say, the real numbers, here's an example: Strictly increasing or strictly decreasing graphs signify one - to - one functions.)

What the graphs don't and can't show, however, is that NHA's claims of high academic performance may be inflated.

But what these graphs illustrate is just how few teachers are actually benefitting from the current pension system.

Helps pupils to decipher what graphs and charts are trying to show them.

Children write about what these graphs tell them.

Alternate or additional assessment: Students will write a brief paragraph that explains what their graphs show.

Guide students to see past what graphs look like and understand what they represent using free online animations.

The 3D effect makes it much harder to see what the graphs are really showing I think.

Fishing seems like the most apt analogy to what graphing is.

This is what the graph looks like.

What the graph doesn't tell you is Match is the longest - running dating site, having been founded in 1995, and has 30 million members who connect via cool features like matchPhone and live events.

By doing this, they start to appreciate what their graph should look and feel like, and how its «slope» changes with the different equations they've been given.

they must decide what the graph already tells them.

What this graph helps illustrate is that we have a lot more commonality in standards and assessments than we did five years ago.

What the graph does not show is how much a hybrid author gains from self publishing.

What this graph is trying to say is that if you just buy and hold on long enough, results get really, really certain, and investing a lot in stocks reduces your risks, it does not raise your risks.

Gavin, instead of selecting 1999 or 1998 as the reference year could you show us what the graph would look like if you pick the baseline used by the IPCC in the AR4?

What the graph does show is signs of acceleration 1993 - 2007 but then there are a couple of large negative steps 2007 - 10 turning the graph into something a denialist could easily claim showed deceleration.

Regarding the «global ice at 1980 levels», here is the canned response we wrote in rebuttal to the astonishingly twisted piece in Daily Tech: What the graph shows is that the global sea ice area for early January 2009 is on the long term average (zero anomaly).

It never occurred to him that it might be useful to know what the graph's captions said.

I mean, how many more Dan H. are out there who won't think twice about what that graph actually means?

Looking forward to seeing what his graph here looks like when redone to take land use changes into account.

What graph are you reading that says otherwise?

I could have used 0,1 K in difference between 1980 and 2000 (because thats what the graph says) but I used 0,2 K to be 100 % fair.

Did you not read the text and just fantasized about what the graph was about?

Here's what the graph shows for the years 2000 - 2009 in the United States:

And this is what the graph shows.

The bottom line here is the models are wrong no matter what graph you use, this arguing about graphs does not show you in a good light (what are you trying to avoid type thing).

Is there any point in arguing with Jo about what graph is used, yes i accept this would be a worthy topic if it actually changed the result but we both know it does not.

His 0.6 per century is way off what his graph shows.

What the graph shows (in plain English) is how the purple data set was deleted from the equations (and graph) and replaced with the thick black data at the end of the series — which gave this chart and all its later version the Hockey Stick shape.

mrmetreon (17:03:18)-- What numbers on the right of what graph?

What this graph produces is a willy - nilly selection of days taken from days between 1983 and 2040, (why not a straightforward 1 year) and the Earth's velocity varies between 29.2 and 30.4 of applee and pears?

In any case, what this graph suggests to me (if I've not been mistaken in my calculations, which can well be the case and needs independent checking) is that Briffa et al.'s data should not be age - detrended based on the data of Briffa et al..

I wonder what the graph would look like if you separated into two graphs, one for OECD countries, another for the rest of the world?

As far as I recall I have not mentioned «rate of warming» and so I suspect you might have misunderstood what the graph shows.

Lynn Vincentnathan (367), as a skeptic I'm probably incented to read into the graph what you read and what the graph asserts.

Now a lot of readers are probably wondering what the τ really means, or more specifically, what the graph looks like as a function of height in the atmosphere.

One of the biggest unknown questions is what the graph of the Lightning Network will end up looking like.

Not exact matches

That's exactly what has happened over the last month, as shown in this graph of the yield on the 10 year US treasury bond for the last year (keep in mind that yields going up means prices going down):

And mortgage refinancing has been one of the most important reasons why the economy has continued to move forward in the last few years, despite the stagnation in real wages, which is what is show in this next graph of average hourly wages divided by consumer prices to give us «real hourly wages»: