Sentences with phrase «what hate speech»

Once the class has confronted what hate speech is, seen firsthand why it's damaging, and taken steps to stop it in their classroom, see if students can find a series of ways to prevent or attack the use of hate speech in their larger community circles.

Not exact matches

MENLO PARK, Calif., April 24 - Facebook Inc on Tuesday released a rule book for the types of posts it allows on its social network, giving far more detail than ever before on what is permitted on subjects ranging from drug use and sex work to bullying, hate speech and inciting violence.

Just a day earlier, the French prime minister and European Commission officials met separately with Facebook, Google, Twitter Inc and other companies to demand faster action on what the commission called «online terrorism incitement and hate speech.»

Facebook suspended or restricted the accounts of many pro-Western Ukrainians after they were accused of hate speech by multiple Russian - speaking users in what appeared to be a coordinated campaign, said former Facebook security staffer Nick Bilogorskiy, a Ukrainian immigrant who helped some of those accounts win appeals.

Facebook Inc on Tuesday released a rule book for the types of posts it allows on its social network, giving far more detail than ever before on what is permitted on subjects ranging from drug use and sex work to bullying, hate speech and inciting violence.

As many users have pointed out, Twitter doubled the character (from 140 to 280) count at a time when there is rampant hate speech and a general tone of confrontation and dissonance on what is a relatively small social media platform.

But if the Facebook Like is protected speech because it ostensibly communicates «the user's approval... and support» of the person, status or thing liked, as Traxler wrote, then what of liking things sarcastically or in jest, or — to use an example from another social network — of «hate - favoriting» on Twitter?

Facebook has struggled for years to figure out what is and isn't hate speech on its platform.

SAN FRANCISCO — Facebook is for the first time publishing its secret rules and guidelines for deciding what its 2.2 billion users can post on the social network, including hate speech, pornography, even cannibalism.

Over the past decade, Facebook has developed dozens of rules to draw the line between what should and shouldn't be allowed on the platform to make Facebook a safer and less toxic place for its 2.2 billion users, from credible threats of harm to hate speech.

Saying hate speech has no place on Facebook, the company also said it would prevent users from indicating what type of ads they would like to see.

Actually, what you need to understand is this: your words qualify as hate speech.

In many countries you can be jailed for hate speech, and a lot of the fundamentalist preachers in this country would be jailed for what they say — why do you think they go to places like Africa with their hate and not to Canada or Europe?

I love free speech but, those in positions of authority who advocate hate, bigotry and acts of violence against others should be held criminally accountable for what they say.

What one may feel is hate speech another may feel is a freedom of expression.

Some U.S. officials spoke to the tension between U.S. support for free speech and what some have described as the film's «hate speech,» in reacting to the attacks.

as for you Ahh comment... I've tried to be nice... doesn't work... with those like you who have closed their minds to God and what his Truth is... So I can fight for my beliefs... like I said... what you call hate speech.

The people who hate on him for expressing his views are the true problem... freedom of speech does not just apply to what you like to hear.

What might be involved if religious communities were to cooperate with others of good will to broker enclaves of spiritual civility, dialogical skin grafts in our ravaged neighborhoods of hate speech, misunderstanding and mistrust, provisional gatherings of our many persuasion, that could model a search for the good in common?

The ones I do know don't hate immigrants (though they think illegal immigration is an economic and criminal problem), think a multicultural society is a good thing (while they are quite tired of politically correct speech codes), and they really do want what's best for the country (though we might differ on what that is).

Well in the hate crime laws there is also restriction of speech and puts one class of citizen above another what about that?

If you want to see bigotry and hate speech just look at what the left is trying to do the CFA.

By all means, do what you have to do... boycott, don't boycott... but there's no benefit in calling anything you don't like the sound of hate speech.

And though neither side represented anything resembling a conventional view of Christianity, what transpired (at least for the first half of the interview), was an entertaining and relatively well - mannered discussion about the dangerous — but passionately followed — theological perspective and hate - speech of the «church» members.

LOL here are a few...» Hey dipstick, Trollolololololol, religious babble, written by someone with a far better knowledge of the world than bronze age goat herders living in the desert, what a moron, hate speech, Christianity is by definition bigotry, you are more likely parroting some nonsensical drivel your pastor spewed forth, supersti tious nonsense, staggeringly arrogant of you, absurd, Your god is a monster.

So it's okay for anti-Christian groups, whoever they may be, to speak freely, but whenever someone wishes to express the tenets of their CHRISTIAN faith openly, which is what this country was founded on, then that's «hate speech.»

Finally I would like to touch on Adebayor's speech about how Wenger forced him out and I kinda hate Ade for what he did, but seeing how Wenger lied to us so many times I can not dismiss this as false.

Let our leaders go to the «people's college» to seek knowledge of what they want so as to arm themselves with the power they need to destroy hate speech as no bill, act or decree can stop the movement occasioned by internal dissatisfaction.

What this implies is that some of these so - called «hate speeches» may actually be personal or subjective interpretation, opinion or commentary garnished with a basket full of prejudice by the reader or the listener.

What constitutes hate speech?

How can Danjuma who was described by President Buhari as soldiers» soldier, who sacrificed for Nigeria through his fearlessness, philanthropic gesture and effort in promoting peace in the society, now join sectional leaders in what some commentators describe as «toxic hate speech?»

In reaction to Acting President Yemi Osinbajo's promise to treat what he described as «hate speech» as terrorism Mr. Jackson Ude the publisher of Pointblank News...

Governor Cuomo gave a fiery speech today at his Times Square rally, attacking Republicans and what he described as the «hate» used by Republicans to «try to divide us.»

But what seems different here is the level of official, government - sponsored anti-gay hate speech.

This is just the latest in a number of attempts to address what appears to be a rise in hate speech across Nigeria.

That any loss of life should occur over what is a disgraceful piece of hate speech is sad enough.

People are allowed to say what they believe, unless it's hate speech, unless it's inciteful,» Zellner said.

«Anyone who uses hate speech, anyone who denigrates our officers, anyone who is negative or threatening to our officers, first of all it's wrong, it's disgusting, it's unacceptable, but second of all, if they actually believe in what they're saying they want to change, that's not how you change it,» he said.

Also on the show, we look into what's driving hate speech, religious bigotry, and racial violence.

We used a database containing hate words to understand what are the most prominent hate words, what is the incidence of hate speech and so on.

That doesn't mean that what he publishes is any less morally reprehensible than various kinds of hate speech, which are also constitutionally protected.

January 22, 2018 • Fake news, hate speech and foreign interference are the notable examples of what went wrong online during the 2016 campaign.

In small groups, invite students to get curious and deepen their understanding of where hate speech comes from, what it is and isn't.

While «good» and «bad» may sound oversimplified, I have used this activity many times in my classroom, and have found that, by examining what's good about hate speech, you can uncover motivation.

What's the difference between teasing, sarcasm, insulting, and hate speech?

What we deem offensive is in accordance with the UN hate speech guidelines and regulations.

You can find out what constitutes hate speech here

That doesn't mean that what he publishes is any less morally reprehensible than various kinds of hate speech, which are also constitutionally protected.

I have no idea what you are referring to, except perhaps that the rote regurgitation of long - since and many - times - over debunked denialist nonsense is mercifully (and no doubt laboriously) deleted by the RC moderators — unlike every other open blog on the Internet where any attempt to discuss the science of anthropogenic global warming is quickly drowned out by a torrent of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, blatant falsehoods, and hate speech against climate scientists.

In a way, this is worse than what the Canadian Islamic Congress enforcers tried to do to me: There's no pretense of «hate speech» or this or that «phobia» or» - ism» or any of the other mawkish, modish concerns of identity - group victimology.