Not exact matches
When Cory Silverberg, a Toronto - based sex educator and author, decided two years ago to write a kids book on
human reproduction called
What Makes a
Baby, he considered two options.
«
What's happening in robotics is we are going from robots in a structured, pre-programmed environment to a free - flowing environment working alongside
humans, and that is a
baby step to a car operating on its own on the road.»
The mountains, the seas, the rivers, the stars, the moon, all the other souls housed in
human form,
babies being born, animals, everything the eyes can see, the heart to feel, ALL is
what God created.
No theologian or counter-circumstance-experience can take away from
what I know,
what many mothers the world over know in their heart of hearts about loss and birth and raising
babies and real transformation: it's Love and it is sacred and it is
human and it all redeems.
Liberals generally are for the killing of
babies and other horendous ideas that war against the sanctity and liberty of
human beings... Giving men with this kind of a world view «equal time» isn't
what I think God desires.
What SINS were COMMITTED by EVERY child,
baby, fetus and
human embryo that justified torturously KILLING them?
Barring natural tragedy, as in miscarriage, or lethal intervention, as in abortion, this being will become
what everyone recognizes as a
human baby.
If
what you interpret Paul as saying is that before creating all the myriad galaxies and star systems God decided that They would put some
humans on the third planet from an insignificant star on a little arm of a middling galaxy and that the first hominids chosen role would be to perform pretty much to spec and do something silly and rebellious (arguably without sufficient information as to consequences for themselves and their off spring, oh, and for serpents) and cause affront to the tripartite godhead warranting separation of Gods grace from all their offspring; then we are left with people being chosen from way back before the Big Bang to do some terrible things like killing
babies or betraying Jesus who was chosen on the same non date (time didn't exist before creation) to die in a fairly nasty fashion and thereby appease the righteous wrath of himself and his fellow Trinitarians by paying a penalty as a substitute for all future sins (of believers?)
mr. hawking., i moved my mouse all aver the figure...
what i saw it looked like a
baby human, also somekind of red arm just appeard on one of the sides.
they are too into themselves to take care of another person... look out for number one... that's
what they do... so sad when people reduce the
human baby (ok fetus) to nothing but a pest and an annoyance to another persons life
The lesson is: no one knows the life time of anyone — The mothers who are delivering a healthy child should be appreciative to The One who took care of the
baby when the
baby was inside of the mother's womb and mother has no access to the
baby — This is a sign for mankind that
what The Creator can do and its not in any
human's hand... all a
human can do is to treat as best as they have the capability — and many more
«
What if», they asked him, «a part - rabbit, part -
baby turned up at the Gates of Heaven: would it have a
human soul?
I am not saying
what so ever that it is ok to let your
baby / child be left uncontrollably crying to the point of vomiting or shaking and any
human being should know that.
I know a woman locally who had a son with a cleft lip and pumped for him exclusively for over a year... I don't know that I would have been able to do that and I commend the moms who so clearly go above and beyond
what the reasonable expectations of «normal» are to try to provide their
babies with
human milk.
And
what happened for all of
human history is that after the
baby is born, the cord would pump.
I think most of us are well aware that being a
human is, well, complicated — how do we want to gain strength and insight from those who have been through
what we're about to experience, be it our first year of college, getting married, having a
baby, getting divorced?
During the first segment / video it would have been nice to see a video clip of
humans giving birth without cord clamping, so that your audience of OB / GYNs and «lay - people» could visualize
what birth could look like without immediate cord clamping and whisking the
baby away for testing.
I agree with
what i think your basic points are — we should consider downsizing the amount of plastic «gear» we parents think we «need,» and that the infant seat shouldn't be used so much that we don't neglect our
babies» needs for
human touch.
You'll find discussions on for example how to avoid becoming a
human pacifier when breastfeeding, whether it is OK to mix formulas,
what to do when a
baby refuses to wean or refuses formula and many other questions.
One of the coolest things Rachael told me (back when we were in a mothers» group together when our 8 - year - olds were
babies) is that the way
humans develop as
babies is the reverse of
what happens when we get old.
But, for the mother who envisioned breastfeeding as a vital part of her mothering experience, or the mother who is concerned with the risks of not providing
human milk to her
baby, the realization that her body isn't going to produce
what her
baby needs to thrive can be devastating.
The list of
what you need for such a tiny
human is never - ending, and preparing a comfortable and clean sleep environment for your
baby is just one small part of your overall checklist.
My worldview is coming from a biological view of
what is normal for
humans and
human babies.
Given that highly affectionate parenting practices are similar to the practices anthropologists believe parents used during the thousands of years that
humans lived in hunter - gatherer societies, it's likely that they are closely matched with
what a developing
baby's brain naturally expects.
You did
what you could to give your
babies human milk and if it doesn't work out, there are lots of other feeding options out there.
Humans have not evolved away from being social mammals, so it makes no sense to argue that
human babies should not be receiving
what social mammals require.
personal preferences, influenced by recent Western cultural values and social ideology, NOT studies of the natural biology and needs of the
human infant have argued against
babies arousing at night to feed a lot; and, indeed, the «sleep like a
baby» or «shush the
baby is sleeping» model, while some kind of western ideal is NOT
what babies are designed to do nor experience, and it is definitely not in their own biological or emotional or social best interest.
Like
human taste buds which reward us for eating
what's overwhelmingly critical for survival i.e. fats and sugars, a consideration of
human infant and parental biology and psychology reveal the existence of powerful physiological and social factors that promote maternal motivations to cosleep and explain parental needs to touch and sleep close to
baby.
Whats more, birth is not simply a means to an end — our birth experience matters, and is of primary importance, not just to us, but to our
babies, our families, and the whole
human race.
It's funny though, because
human nature guides these little angels, and most of their first tastes (outside of
baby food firsts) come because they show an interest in
what those around them are eating.
Two: Someone who considers that a woman who decides to «sacrifice» a career for the good of little ones who need her help to grow into self contained
human beings is a terrific person, a stand up for
what she believes in, a helper with the creation of the future world, sooooo stressed looking after
baby and helping Junior with potty training, and a total martyr to the cause of saintly motherhood.
Add to that, having to wait through
what seems like an eternity to greet your tiny
human, the squishy - faced, miniature version of yourself can make you wish you had a time machine and could fast forward to the part where you have a beautiful, healthy
baby.
It was wonderful to see how the mother knew
what to do for her
baby, although it looks a bit rough to a
human like me, lol!
arms, carried, or fed, then the solution is clear —
human attention is exactly
what baby needs — that's how
baby is designed, and for viable reasons.
So the next time a homebirth or natural childbirth advocate insists that childbirth is a
human rights issue don't hesitate to ask the obvious question:
what human rights in childbirth does the
baby have?
I've always considered myself to be a pretty laid back
human, I just never realized
what a positive attribute that would be when I started dealing with
babies and toddlers.
I think
what would give flight attendants more power to do the right thing in these situations is if their employers provided them with a policy that stated that they will uphold
human rights legislation, which includes not discriminating against mothers and
babies, and therefore breastfeeding is allowed and mothers are free to breastfeed their
babies in the manner that they feel is appropriate.
What we
human adults know as «skin» isn't fully formed until about the third trimester of pregnancy; thus, a
baby's outer covering takes almost the full nine months to finish developing.
It was the first book to express
what mothers have always known:
babies are born complete
human beings with the ability to experience a full range of emotions.
She discussed a variety of fascinating topics, including breastfeeding and the media, her research on
what the natural age of weaning would be in modern
humans if we set aside our cultural beliefs, and caring for children and why
babies cry.
«Growth standards for
babies and children have become an essential component of the
human paediatric tool kit but until now there's been limited information available on
what constitutes optimal growth in dogs.
To determine
what level of a toxin is safe, researchers take a dose that has no observed toxicological effect in an animal and divide it by 10 once (to account for the differences between species) and then again (to account for variations among
humans» ability to handle toxins); for pesticides, the dose is then divided by 10 a third time (to allow for the extraordinary sensitivity of
babies and children).
«One month is very impressive, and the data behind that is strong,» Mychaliska says, but adds that
what works for lambs might not work as well for
human babies.
Marina Davila - Ross, a neuroscientist at the University of Portsmouth in England, sought an answer in
what is perhaps science's most enjoyable research project: tickling
human and ape
babies to compare their laughter.
Finally, Niels Rattenborg from the Max Planck Institute for Ornithology in Seewiesen hopes that «this naturally occurring variation in REM sleep during a period of brain development can be used to reveal exactly
what REM sleep does for the developing brain in
baby owls, as well as
humans.»
It's still unknown to
what extent this research, conducted in mice, is relevant to
human beings, but the scientists hope that an improved understanding of this process may in the future help prevent certain neurological disorders in
babies, caused by disruptions in the mother's immune system.
«We
humans are like a newborn
baby left on a doorstep, with no note explaining who it is, where it came from,
what hereditary cargo of attributes and disabilities it might be carrying, or who its antecedents might be,» write the authors.
Brown fat burns calories, and is
what hibernating animals — and even
human babies — use to keep warm.
You damn well better believe that there is research going on in animal models —
what does she expect, that scientists should mutagenize
human mothers and chop up
baby brains for this work?
The role of these good bacteria is to train the
baby's
human cells to distinguish between
what is «friend» and
what is «foe» so that its immune system can fight off attack from pathogens.