Sentences with phrase «what humans are»

Carter says, «If horses are not in their herd, they are instinctively motivated to pay attention to what the humans are doing in their presence.»

The brain is so much of who and what humans are, as a species and as unique individuals with different abilities, talents, personalities, and intellects.

Seems a pretty good analogy for what humans are doing to the atmosphere

So perhaps you could tell us what Humans are doing to cause Global Warming, other than emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere?

Humans are pumping out 8GT of CO2 emissions per year and 1/2 of them are being absorbed by sinks — sinks which have increased over time to absorb 1/2 of what humans are pumping out.

And it must be art, because the data will send a powerful message: Finally the birds have a chance to tell us what humans are doing to their air.

The group has come up with an interesting radar graphic, and wants a little feedback.The future scenarios take into account the idea of peak everything - water, oil, carbon emissions... - and what humans are likely to do as a response as we hit our planet's limits.

But beyond the serious matter of what we humans are doing to alter the planet's ecological balance, there's also the matter of our place in the universe, says Forman:

You are permitted to note, as a parenthetical, that no single weather calamity can be ascribed with absolute certainty (roll your eyes here to signal the exasperating fussiness of scientists) to what humans are doing to the atmosphere.

And what humans are now doing to the Earth's airs and waters through CO2 and related greenhouse gas emissions may well be shockingly similar.

It seems that the Earth's climate varies between periods of natural global warming and natural global cooling, regardless of what us humans are doing...

Of course that bad fit between science and what humans are seeking ends up making some people, often unconsciously, very selective about the science they embrace or ignore.

I'm no longer surprised by anything I read regarding what humans are doing to this planet.

So many wild animals are endangered because of what humans are doing to their environment.

For several decades, the natural science research related to goals has proceeded around the idea that we can identify particular limits in Nature and then work backwards to compute what humans are allowed to do.

Bartholl asks not just what humans are doing with media, but what media is doing with humans.

Resistance 3 focuses on humanity and individual stories and what humans are doing; how they're coping with the Chimeran occupation.»

Instructor Bryce grabs Yayan's arm, who is engrossed in his compass, to point out the Mola Mola coming over to have a look at what the humans are doing.

So sad what humans are doing to animals for the sake of money and social status.

He said, «It's an insane journey that changed what humans are.

Fill your own basket with Jones Natural Chews and you won't even want what your humans are having!

Some studies have shown that dogs understand what their humans are saying, especially when we praise them.

Storytelling is truly fundamental to what we humans are: not just how we communicate, but more basically, how we interpret and understand the world and our places in it.

The film takes us around the world, showing us what we humans are doing right and wrong in equal measure.

He begins to question his own faith and belief in hope and the future as it relates to what humans are doing to the earth and the systems around him that preach righteousness while enabling polluters and taking their cash in the process.

Anyway, keep living like a ruminant, I personally don't mind and judge, but I will keep eating what humans are best adapted to — an omnivore diet!

«If we don't understand what is natural, I don't think we can say much about what the humans are doing.

«Believe me, I am concerned about what humans are doing,» he said.

«It's a more realistic scenario of imitating what humans are doing.

- That's what we humans are known for.

Plus it can lead to misguided thinking, such as women are «naturally» more monogamous, and once we get into what humans are «naturally» or «biologically» geared toward, we are entering dangerous territory, especially when it comes to things like marriage, reproduction, gender and sex.

The Bible is more about what humans are like than it is about what God is like.

Christards, Sikhs, Muslims, Jews etc. are regularly defamed here by enemies of God — filth who lack bits of what humans are.

Jesus does not just reveal to us what God is like, but He also reveals to us what humans are supposed to be like.

With this experience of what we humans are capable of doing to one another, and with the decline of belief in a providential God, there is far less confidence about the human future among informed people today than there was at the beginning of the twentieth century.

Focusing on the fantasy and ignoring the reality of who and what humans are is also dehumanizing.

The problem is that we get scared of everything that we didn't grow up with; it's what human beings do.

The ignorance bred by religion regarding what human beings as containing a ghost in the machine led the way for the misconceptions believed by communists regarding human beings as blank slates, since both religion and communists envisioned human beings in this flawed conceptual manner, denying the evolved components of the brain and the innate nature we are born with due to our genetic make up.

That's what human beings can do — ex ungue leonem: From the claw, we can tell that a lion once was here.

Evidence that probably shows you more than what a human being backed with a theory about the scientific method, possible misunderstandings and personal opinions can offer you.

In this way, by the most shocking of theological twists, we learn what God is truly like only after we have learned what a human is truly supposed to be.

Most of it's national energies have not been spent on the issue of what a human being is, let alone WHO a person is, not to mention WHEN life begins.

In redefining marriage and the family, the state not only embarks on an unprecedented expansion of its powers into realms heretofore considered prior to or outside its reach, and not only does it usurp functions and prerogatives once performed by intermediary associations within civil society, it also exercises these powers by tacitly redefining what the human being is and committing the nation to a decidedly post-Christian (and ultimately post-human) anthropology and philosophy of nature.

Some are alarmed by what human beings are doing to their physical environment and concerned about the role of theology in distracting attention from this.

Secondly, and more importantly, they realize fully what we human beings only sense obscurely, namely, that the intrinsic dynamism of mind and will within the individual person is toward transcendence, participation in the more comprehensive «mind» and «will» of a community.

Perhaps the major difference between Wood and the other proposals we have examined (except for the Mud Flower Collective's proposal) is located here, at the point of explicitly or implicitly assumed anthropology or view of what a human being is.

We are reminded, time and again, that what human beings do with their freedom matters, even when, like James, they choose paths that are no longer easily understandable to most readers, renouncing worldly values for the sake of something «harder to define.»

War between religions is what we human beings experienced during the Dark Ages.

That means that God's justice is quite different from what human beings normally think of as justice.

Yet there are those who say just that by redefining what a human being is.