Sentences with phrase «what humans think»

I am certain that God has a place in heaven for all them despite what some humans think of them or do to them.

Most of what humans think dogs need — paw boots, mechanical toys, rhinestone collars, Halloween costumes — is all in the human mind.

Dogs don't know what humans think is acceptable behavior.

A Christian who doesn't think there are moral absolutes (things that are right or wrong no matter what humans think) is like an Atheist who thinks there are.

And it is because of this, it is because there exists in you this ineffable synthesis of what our human thought and experience would never have dared join together in order to adore them — element and totality, the one and the many, mind and matter, the infinite and the personal; it is because of the indefinable contours which this complexity gives to your appearance and to your activity, that my heart, enamoured of cosmic reality, gives itself passionately to you.

I believe the bible was written by humans and that it ONLY describes what those humans thought about God.

Any god who cared about what humans thought of him wouldn't dare allow the creation and spread of the bible; ergo, the god of the bible does not exist (unless he is a trickster purposely playing head games with us as a colossal azzhole might).

Oliver is telling the story of his life from a dog's perspective (or at least from what a human thinks is a dog's perspective).

Not exact matches

In those kinds of use cases, I think we're unlocking the power of what it means to be human.

And in the future, journeys into space or the merging of humans with machines might change what we think of as ideal.

If we think of the corporation (for - profit or otherwise) as an instrument or technology by means of which people seek to achieve their goals, then it becomes clear that the rights (or «rights») of different kinds of corporate persons depend not on what kind of entity they are, but on the the demonstrable goals of the human beings involved.

When my client started thinking about what his various audiences needed from him, his communication got a lot more relevant and meaningful — and more human.

Guerin says, «It's human nature to think, «Well, I know her, I know him, and here's probably what happened,» but you don't want to do that.»

People can tell you you're beautiful, smart, intelligent, the best, or they can tell you that you are the most horrible human being on earth — but what matters is what you think about yourself.

«Trailblazers in the private sector have inspired us to think of what is bigger than Earth... We are only a generation away from a permanent human residency on Mars.»

PopTech is a three - day think tank in Camden, Maine, at which you're likely to hear a discussion on «what it means to be human» before heading off to Cappy's Chowder House for lunch.

As human beings, we are mostly what we eat, think and do.

As humans, we crave talking about ourselves — about 40 percent of what comes out of our mouths is devoted to telling others about our thoughts and feelings — and it's way more satisfying to showcase the exhilarating moments than it is the countless mundane ones.

What do you think the future looks like as machines begin to displace humans?

It's human nature for people to think it terms of «what's in it for me,» so start the conversation there.

This course provides a foundation for developing your own approach to skillfully managing employees by illustrating alternative human resource management (HRM) strategies, introducing the importance of the legal context, and thinking about what motivates employees.

«I believe that human connection and live interaction is what drives thought - provoking ideas and success in both your family and your career.

But if you think beyond the internet, what actually brings the world together is built - in human nature — ...

The theory behind it is simple: If Facebook has experimented on its users to find new and exciting ways to get us to use it in the way they'd prefer, we should also feel free to experiment on Facebook, and see if those experiments change how we think about what we share with one of the biggest repositories of human data in history.

Bitcoinist: As an assistant professor of economics, what do you think Bitcoin can be compared to as far as human inventions go?

What do Atheist fear... I think they are humans too, so they fear pretty much the same things that the Faithful do.

Further, I think that even what you see as limited human logic abilities are quite robust and testable.

So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.

Our baptismal confession is not about the state of our emotions nor about what Jesus subjectively means to us or who we think he is: a prophet, a teacher of ethics, or whatever other projection human beings can invent in their attempts to justify themselves.

I think what you and I both know, is that, if humans are still around, they will naturally replace the current God and holy books with new ones.

What you're giving up is your freedom to think for yourself by accepting this fantasy man - in - the - sky BS that has somehow managed to propagate throughout the centuries of modern human existence.

After reading several of the posts on the «interpretation of mythical texts into a book called the bible» one is left to wonder how a being who is supposed to have created the universe would permit what is often referred to as «his inerrant words»... to get so screwed up... you would think he / she / it would have been keeping a close eye on a book that he / she / it wanted to have in print for... mass distribution... it is not not a womder the bible is messed up the way it is... it is a «human» construct... only humans could mess a book up that badly... gods do nor make mistakes... except for Rick Santorum

I would like to point out to those here who think it is not possible for Jesuits (or anyone) to hold science and faith simultaneously, and who invoke «evidence» as the only arbiter of what is real, that human knowledge is always evolving.

This is part of what it means to think politically, because politics is about action in a realm of uncertainty; politics is about human choice, but these choices are not infinite.

«god» doesn't exist and is make believe, your religious texts were written by human beings without any kind of «divine inspiration» regardless of what you read in them... written by people who thought the Earth was flat... it isn't.

Science has it 100 % right on this fact, the human brain is what enables us to process any conscious thought.

EVERYTHING that religion is is but a miniscule fraction of what aetheism is and what venues of thought it opens up for HUMANS.

Applying metaphor from creativity within the human psyche, he illustrated how each step along the route from the primal thought of being to the mundane activity of this world is an artificial leap from what came before.

Taken that the reality is an invisible God that isn't evident to everyone, and a plain declaration in the Bible that God is supposedly so alien that no human could possibly know his mind, I frankly find it puzzling how any believer can have confidence in what this being actually thinks without falling to wishful thinking, can you?

I think too that if we're going to start using the Sacred Text for prooftexting our particular understanding of human psychology then what about the claims of Jeremiah that speaks of the unknowability of the human heart?

You say that you don't see Jesus in the churches — I don't know what churches you have been to, but there are definitely churches that do well in representing and teaching Jesus Christ (not all churches of course) HOWEVER... if you think you will find perfection in a human being, you must know that your kidding yourself.

What makes you think we humans are all knowing and capable of making that claim?

You know, when I think about «empire» — Roman or Egyptian or Chinese or Russian or American — and consider both accomplishments and damage inflicted (human and otherwise), and then think about what Christianity might have to say on the subject, the first thing that comes to mind is «to whom much has been given, from him much will be required.»

«What makes you think we humans are all knowing» — Who is doing that?

I really don't see what he gains from being indifferent and idiotic about the issue, but for the mere fact he can't make up his mind whether humans are a cause behind global climate changes makes me think this guy isn't fit to run the country.

I don't know what you think you're proving here, but human beings are very good at compartmentalizing, which allows them to embrace contradictory attitudes and behaviors.

It would still be true, I think, that the content of such an experience, and even a fully adequate and somehow (impossibly) guaranteed inventory of that content, would not alone provide any nonarbitrary basis, intuitive or articulate, for distinguishing what is essential to the experience simply as an experience, and what is essential to it as a specifically human experience — nor even for determining whether there is anything peculiarly one's own in the experience, as distinguished from what is essential to human experience as human or as experience.

We are simply not claiming to know what god is, what god wants or to think that humans are moral and good because they follow some ancient scripture — or not.

However as my exposure to your writing increased I started to think that what you were describing as «Church» related problems were in fact fundamental characteristics of human nature.

63 When bloody flooding killed the human race And brand - new oceans put man in his place, Except for those who carried mankind's seed, I, first of creatures, snubbed what law decreed, While I mocked yielding to the Lord's command, For which, I think, a poet would declare, «The sin....