Sentences with phrase «what if its claim»

What if I claimed I flew to New York in a 67 Mustang, heard God through the radio speaking to me alone and telling me to build a church on the site of the twinitowers?

What if they claimed we can't truly know whether the sun orbits Earth or vice versa and, moreover, that such questions were not even worth asking?

What if they claim they've suffered a bodily injury loss and they now have weakness, fatigue, and panic attacks because of the disturbed sleep?

What if you claim benefits after your full retirement age?

Firstly, if you get a court order that sets out how the financial claims have been settled between you and your ex-partner, then this will determine what if any claims can be made in the future.

An insurer might be offering the cheapest term plan but what if its claim rejection ratio is over 50 %?

What if a claim isn't your fault?

What if they claim they've suffered a bodily injury loss and they now have weakness, fatigue, and panic attacks because of the disturbed sleep?

Not exact matches

«People don't walk around with anti-résumés telling you what they have not studied or experienced (it's the job of their competitors to do that), but it would be nice if they did,» Taleb claims.

To bolster their claim, they presented novel statistics: the percentage of the team's total yardage that Thomas contributed by way of his running, pass - catching, and blocking, and what the team's overall stats and win - loss record would likely be if Thomas were replaced with an average player.

That helps you figure out what's missing if there's a break - in and provides extra documentation for the claim, said Humphrey.

«It's a farce to claim to be offering «free college» to employees when what's being offered is simply the chance to pursue a degree at one specific university, only online, only if you enroll full time and work at least 20 hours a week,» Dr. Sara Goldrick - Rab, professor of educational policy studies and sociology at the University of Wisconsin, told Think Progress.

If they had, the number would likely have been far more modest than what politicians would claim, as a significant portion of the increase in payrolls would have happened even without the tax rebate.

If you're a fan of Shark Tank, you've likely seen the panel of investors scoff at what a founder claims his business is worth.

«Another important aspect of the new laws is that employees in corporations of any size will not be able to bring an unfair dismissal claim if the employer can show that their employment was terminated because of what the Bill describes as «genuine operational reasons»» «The genuine operational reasons provision is very broadly drafted and includes economic, technological or structural reasons» said Mr Drake - Brockman «This would allow an employer to successfully counteract an unfair dismissal claim in nearly all situations which result in a genuine redundancy».

«We have a tendency to spend what comes in, so behaviorally, if we claim sooner, we'll spend more,» he said.

If you claim any earlier, your benefits will be permanently reduced — to what extent varies by your birth year and how much earlier you're claiming.

If they make the video cut, put them on the spot in the interview to verify what they claim to be great at.

In addition, it noted what would be fairly boilerplate severance terms: «If the Company terminates Mr. Ryan's employment without cause on or after a change in control or he resigns for good reason due to a change in control, subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims, the Company will pay him, in addition to his previously - accrued compensation, severance equal to the following: (i) in the case of a change in control of Tribune Publishing or the Company, 12 months of his base salary and one year of his annual targeted bonus amount.»

In fact, if investors are worried at all about the U.S. fiscal deficit, then if anything a cut in the deficit will cause even more money to enter the United States, and if the U.S. capital account surplus rises, then so must the U.S. trade deficit, which is the opposite of what Shultz and Feldstein claim.

It only makes sense to itemize your taxes if your itemized deductions exceed what you would be able to claim as the standard deduction.

This does not mean you need to put any kind of cap on how much you spend on, for example, travel and entertainment, providing you limit the amount you claim to what is allowed, but it does mean you should be prepared for a visit from the IRS if those numbers are uncommonly high.

However, if Autopilot is truly as good as Musk claims — if driver safety actually improves when Tesla owners flip the switch — then this move to make the data public is critical for changing laws, behavior and the public's perception of what's safe and what isn't.

The pornographic film actress Stephanie Clifford, known professionally as Stormy Daniels, is offering to return a $ 130,000 payment if she is allowed to speak freely about what she claims was an affair with President Trump.

If they agree to Mr. Avenatti's terms, Ms. Clifford can speak openly about not only the sexual relationship she claims to have had with Mr. Trump shortly after his wife, Melania, gave birth to the couple's son, Barron, but also about what she describes as an effort to silence her with «hush money.»

When the process has run its course, they threaten their work force with bankruptcy that will wipe out its pension benefits if employees do not agree to «downsize» their claims and replace defined - benefit plans with defined - contribution plans (in which all that employees know is how much they pay in each month, not what they will get in the end).

To restate: If O'Leary is the pure economic libertarian he seems, and not a culture warrior, then he's actually no Trump, regardless of what he, O'Leary, may claim.

If, on the other hand, you receive just a handful of names, then it's likely that the claims that have been made are exactly what they seem to be — too good to be true.

What Everybody Ought to Know About Nonprofit Insurance The specifics of nonprofit insurance companies has many wondering just how much scope and coverage they get to provide to those working for nonprofit organizations and if these services are really what they claim to be, which looks to consider just how little is known about these types of policWhat Everybody Ought to Know About Nonprofit Insurance The specifics of nonprofit insurance companies has many wondering just how much scope and coverage they get to provide to those working for nonprofit organizations and if these services are really what they claim to be, which looks to consider just how little is known about these types of policwhat they claim to be, which looks to consider just how little is known about these types of policies.

«If it does, voting shareholders may properly claim that their interests have been unfairly disregarded or prejudiced under what is known as the «oppression remedy.»

This means if you stop paying what you owe on your mortgage and the lender forecloses on your property and suffers a loss, the insurance company will pay out a claim to the lender.

What it will need to overcome, if it is to succeed, is a kind of «can't do» attitude that has developed over the years, which has made the agency timid about tackling any issue that is likely to prompt strong industry resistance and all too ready to accept unfounded industry claims about the likely impact of regulations.

What Zhang was referring to is the rumor that struck headlines in December last year that stated that Alibaba will takeover Ele.me because it did not meet its VAM, an agreement that allows investors to claim their money back if the company they invested in fails to deliver.

Religion can prove none of what it claims, and if you disagree with them, you're going to hell.

Hence, if it is irreducibly complex to have evolved by the mechanisms that have proven so effective in explaining other phenomenta — then what mechanism explains the origins of these other things claimed to be irreducibly complex?

If you are claiming to be in the «body of Christ» and the «institutional» church is not, maybe you have something to offer about who Christ is, what he did and what it means, and you might be able to do it during the week where the west commemorates it.

Lenn, I know that God will completely destroy my saying this to you, because you don't want to believe him, but if you bother to check, God told them they were speaking words without knowledge, that instead, it was like a womb with a dust cloud, the line stretched on it... where were you when he did it... how can you claim to know what he did... declare if you have understanding.

But if you look at the bible and how christians use it by picking out what parts they agree with and dismissing the horror of it as «cultural of the times» it says to me that their sense of right and wrong is more evolved than the book they claim is the final authority of right and wrong.

Now I realize that for atheists that probably won't be any more believable, but if you're going to say «the bible said...» while mocking it for being unbelievable then you should at least make sure it actually says what you're claiming.

The first part of Job is where Satan is claiming he knows the future and what Job will do if Satan can do his worst, and God cleans up on that too, telling him he's wrong as well... God again ending up right.

but don't believe NOTHING nobody else says about God because I know God and I know what he said in HIS book, but I have to tell you... 99.99 % of the stuff «religion» claims God said... Is not what he actually said... If you look at what he said.

They claimed to know what Obama would say if he were in fact sitting in that chair, and of course the words they put in his mouth (including profanities) were words of their choosing, not his.

If you claim to be a «Christian» then I think you should look hard in the mirror and ask yourself... «what did Jesus say about this?»

My point was that if you propose that, as a society, we teach children that there is no God, then you are doing what you claim to oppose: indoctrinating children with what is your personal belief.

You speak as if you have done so yourself... or have you accepted at face value what Dawkins and many others claim: that there is no evidence of God?

In which case I sincerely trust that you are not and have never claimed to be a Christian, because that is EXACTLY what Jesus tells the Rich Young Ruler to do if he truly wants to live a righteous life: «Sell all you have, give it to the poor, and come and follow me.»

So if Ryan claims to be speaking in the name of his Church and the Bishops continue to have sharp and specific disagreements with much of what Ryan is saying, aren't the Bishops morally and theologically obligated to shoot Ryan down again?

If you claim someone else was such... what ever... it's the same set of reasons for rejecting the bible accounts therein.

BUT... if the Church is going to claim and treat sexual deviance (if in fact that is what they believe it is) with such force over and against all other indiscretions, how do they justify that... and how isn't it hypocritical of them when they simply wink at other things that are clearly outlined by Jesus» own words as grievous.

If the group in questions claims it is what it is then why can't everyone just accept it and move on?