I ain't saying your content isn't solid, but
what iff you added a headline to maybe grab people's attention?
Not exact matches
«
What -
iffing» ourselves with disastrous outcomes is typically human, but also completely destructive to our capacity to make sound decisions.
What I'm «
iffing» in my head is would've Sanchez got some power behind it IF Giroud would've not interfered with his foot?
They are supposed to objectively compare
what a person has done,
what the law forbids, and let the state derive the person of life, liberty or property if and only
iff the person has done something forbidden.