Sentences with phrase «what imaginary being»

Not exact matches

In some cases, the top of the proverbial food chain at the tropical sweat shop where some companies quarter their customer service reps is an often imaginary supervisor who apparently doesn't do anything except spend all of his or her in meetings with God knows who, discussing God knows what.

Are we going to have to have a cultural moment, where we're coming to grips with what it means to interface with imaginary worlds layered on top of reality?

Putting things in perspective means looking at what is truly real and what is a problem that is imaginary or rather built up in your mind.

However, I will not put stock into some imaginary thing that «knows all» and will reveal what IT wants when IT wants and be heppy with that.

see what religion does... all in the name of some imaginary sky - daddy, who is nothing but just one of the thousands of «gods» invented by man over the course of human history.

Just because we don't believe in your imaginary friend or the imaginary friend of other religions does not mean we don't hold beliefs, the difference is that we care that what we believe is true... you don't care (thus the faith you have in the buybull).

What a woman does with her body is between her and her Doctor, not her and an imaginary, vidictive - murderer - rapist - child abusing god.

That's why their minds are focused on what real and important to them as they approach death, instead of some imaginary sky daddy that their subconscious never really bought into.

And what if the God who made everything, keeping all the planets and stars precisely in their orbits, and creating life anew every day, is obviously not imaginary?

Imaginary beings do not do things, and thus have no «why» to «why» they do what people imagine they do.

And this suppose to be a GOD that loves us??????????????? I have better thing to do then to pray to an imaginary presence, and even less time for people that «think» they know what this imaginary presence wants!

Satan has successfully deceived you and all the Anti-Christ into thinking that he and God is just an imaginary friend... you ain't gonna like what you see after you die.

What makes you think there is any way to go back to believing in other imaginary beings?

And Playboy is much more honest that The Babble — it is what it is without any need for a secret decoder ring or belief in imaginary beings to interpret it.

I don't care what American jesus or any other mystical imaginary manmade being thinks!

«to the ones do not believe in god when you in tragic situation who do you call on, 911 happen when a republican took whitehouse so you idiots a tragic have not happen yet so prayer does work and you with all the hate and jealousy you will reap what you sow» ok, if this is a serious post then my answer is... in a tragic situation I certainly do nt turn to an imaginary being in the sky because that would be pointless.

But they are more interested in telling others what to do, rather than dealing with their own failure to follow their imaginary sky daddy.

Part of the problem is that I can't read your mind, so I have no idea what the exact attributes of your imaginary friend are.

I WILL always be a militant Atheist if it means I can keep nutbags from telling me how to live my life and what I can do not because it hurts another person but because their imaginary sky man tells them they can't and as a result I can't either.

It does describe quite nicely what a monster beyond compare your imaginary friend is.

Flawed logic, but what can you expect from someone who is an adult (presumably) and still has an invisible, imaginary best friend.

These understandings are what humans take for granted by virtue of being socialized into a particular imaginary.

We happily admire an imaginary world more readily than we admire what is called «reality» (especially when we can not do much to change or improve that «real world»).

«You have to tell yourself this crap to justify your reason for believing in an imaginary friend «= > No my love for God is based on what God personally has done in my life.

What will be great is wen you provide the evidence to support your imaginary friends existence!

We understand it for what it truly is... a book that condones mass murder; rape; incest; child abuse; oppression of women; oppression of LGBT... your imaginary friend is not anything worthy of respect and it doesn't pertain to those who are capable of thinking for themselves and doing well without it.

I care about the life people like you are attempting to force in to this world, you care about what appeases your god - big difference when you really don't care or consider the child only what your imaginary friend god wants and yet your god cause abortions all the time... you care about a clump of cells, not the actual life of the child and that's much worse than me supporting the rights of a woman to have control over her body, especially if the clump of cells couldn't survive outside of the host.

Maybe you have failed to comprehend this, what a person does with their body is not your business nor the business of your imaginary friend god.

Figure out what you CAN NOT influence and control and... forget about it and stop hoping your imaginary friend is gonna bail your sorry believing butt out; she won't

Geez... I can only imagine what the would do to me, because I revere MANY «imaginary beings».

What do you mean he is imaginary??? Also where's the body???

Any dangers in renouncing inerrancy were largely imaginary, Beegle claimed; one must let the «facts» of Scripture show straightforwardly what kind of book it is and that will suffice.

Silverman's tactics might not be what every atheists feel when it comes to the imaginary war on Christmas, but the organization American Atheists does very great work that should be recognized.

But if you want to introduce a whole new criticism that you don't believe the Bible is what Christians believe it is, you are of course also wrong, and simply blindly railing against the idea of religious authority and expertise because, God forbid someone else suggest to you what is right or divinely inspired because that might limit your imaginary freedom and insult your nonexistent expertise and intelligence.

They «lll drop to their knees, grovel before their imaginary god, and beg to be told what, oh what, to do; then their pathetic little minds will lead them down whatever path is the meanest and most destructive to freedom for anyone who doesn't share their supernatural delusions.

What sounds even sillier is that after you die, if you say you're sorry and really mean it, you'll be in some paradise land and have happiness for eternity under this imaginary friend that you spoke you you're whole life.

Here we come back, of course, to the need of visualizing in a material way what may be an imaginary, purely spiritual vision.

What is compelling is that as an adult, you still have an imaginary «friend».

I am sick of reading about what other religions are doing to woman, children and to other people who won't go along with their imaginary friend.

Does it break your poor heart that the church is being exposed for what it truly is - a cult of pedophiles protected by the fact that they all share a similar imaginary friend and a church that constantly rages war on women?

While you are free to believe in fairy tales and imaginary babysitters that read your mind, rational people will dismiss that nonsense for what it is.

The Bible will always be a valuable book for people curious as to what people believed in lieu of facts during the times when people, mostly Europeans and people dominated by Europeans, ordered their lives and justified the things they did by appealing to an imaginary God.

Much to what I can only assume is your dismay, many are quite good without your imaginary friend.

what about people who don't believe the bible is the divine inspired word of your imaginary man in the sky?

If your child has an «imaginary friend,» will you ask what the color of skin of that «friend» is?

... being an imaginary dialogue between a nominee to a Federal appeals court and members of the Committee on the Judiciary of what once imagined itself «the world's greatest deliberative body»...

What exactly is your personal reason for disliking gays (your belief in the imaginary friend you call god is not justification)?

Ignorance, extremism, and intolerance are ugly things no matter what imaginary friend club or other cause you choose to belong to.

Calling me stupid when you think you and your imaginary friend have any say over what a woman does with her body??? Are you seriously that delusional?

Why is your Atheism so «shaky» it can be impacted by what are apparently nothing more than invocations to an imaginary «sky - fairy»???