Sentences with phrase «what intelligent people»

So I implore us, let's stop the bickering and do what intelligent people would do and to a big extent, doing already.

Then we will see what intelligent people bent on ultimate survival can really accomplish.

A great gulf began to open up between what intelligent people were thinking and saying on the one hand, and what the church continued to teach on the other.

I think it was exactly what any intelligent person expected that they would say.

What intelligent person without their head in the sand could even think that?

You are essentially admitting what any intelligent person has known for a long time, which is that it is impossible to convince you in regards to AGW.

Of course, it's important to be aware of these basics, but I am tempted to call this sort of thing armchair online therapy training, because it's what any intelligent person is capable of discovering completely on their own, without ever encountering a real live client.

Not exact matches

What follows are the 15 most common body language blunders that people make, and emotionally intelligent people are careful to avoid.

Yes, many of us have heard about it, we've read books on it, but for the lay person just getting started on their immersion into emotional intelligence, what is it exactly and how do you know when you're being emotionally intelligent?

What would make anyone notice you over all the other extremely qualified and intelligent people who have big ideas?

People can tell you you're beautiful, smart, intelligent, the best, or they can tell you that you are the most horrible human being on earth — but what matters is what you think about yourself.

If you can gauge what people mean to say, or how they're feeling, that's a sure sign you're emotionally intelligent.

What other similar scenario would have intelligent people investing in further development of this?

So a large number of good and smart people in good faith developed an investing strategy that they thought was supported by the peer - reviewed research but in reality was the OPPOSITE of what the peer - reviewed research would support once all the peer - reviewed research needed to make intelligent choices had been published.

Unlike some of the comments left on this subject, I would hope that intelligent, rational people would listen and make their own decision as to what they believe, that is the freedom we have.

What you determine is «ridiculous and toxic» «splaining» is what most people call intelligent discouWhat you determine is «ridiculous and toxic» «splaining» is what most people call intelligent discouwhat most people call intelligent discourse.

Can't be too intelligent, as you seem to misunderstand that atheism, like any form of theism, is strictly a belief, and what a person believes has ZERO BEARING on how intelligent they can BECOME.

Quite frankly, I'm not interested in any «intelligent discourse which is little more than a circle jerk of a discussion where privileged people sit around and abstractly theorize about what the «real problems» of and «solutions to» marginalized people's problems that doesn't center the words and experiences of actual marginalized people and their own understanding of their own problems.

zealous belief in ANYTHING (or in the absense of an anything) is not good, intelligent people make good choices based on the information available and realize that everything is not perfect no matter what precept you prescribe to.

If you pay attention to what I wrote, I accuse both the atheist and the religious person in that «intelligent design» conversation of anthropomorphizing intelligence and debating the point from the wrong perspective in the first place.

people in NY are usually cooler and more intelligent than what you portray here.

I think its a fantastic idea to «create your own religion,» but I know of no intelligent person who would say that «man exists by accident,» so I have no idea what that's supposed to mean.

This has always struck me as refreshing since unfortunately, I also know what it is like for people to treat me as if I am the support staff rather than an intelligent and educated leader.

They ridiculed what they understood to be Christian dogma and led me to wonder how any intelligent person could be a Christian.

It's amazing what otherwise intelligent people will accept from authority figures.

I figured this out, they want to look fake and phony, some one that no person in their right mind would actually believe a word they said, for they are looking for people who are not in their right mind, the last thing they want in their congregation is intelligent people who might question what they are doing.

What kind of thinking can a reasonable, intelligent person use to justify this kind of character assassination upon someone they hardly even know and had never had a hard word pass from my lips to theirs?

What more can be asked than careful consideration of a thoughtful and intelligent person's point of view?

«In my own opinion this debate is fuelled by an overoptimism in what can be achieved with AI algorithms, as well as an underestimating of how intelligent people really are.

What human persons observe and discern to be true of the physical realm never denies that that very intelligent observation is a metaphysical relationship, which in turn relates to a greater intelligence, a Divine Person.

Looking people in the eye, listening to what they have to say and making an intelligent response that lets them know we really heard what they were saying, not acting like we're in a hurry to move on but have time to listen, letting them know they are more important than our stupid cell phones, encouraging them and letting them know we think they can succeed — all of those things are extremely important in building relationships, including relationships with homeless people.

The problem is that organized religion is as much political animal as any other human convention involving more than 2 people, and spiritual, thinking individuals are intelligent enough to know that churches / mosques / community reprogramming centers actually have very little to do with what one actually believes...

But an intelligent person will search for the answers, knowing he doesn't know, and THAT is what drives him to seek an answer, not blindly accepting the answer from someone who looks at a 2000 year old book, filled with 3000 year old stories and gives up after reading it.

What really amazes me is that some intelligent people believe in God and all that other hocus pocus that all religions push.

I personally don't care what people believe, but I do ask that they not assume I'm less of a good person, or less of an intelligent person, because my beliefs are not their own.

Does it require an intelligent person with an ability to «nuance» their faith in order to understand what God says?

That intelligent people get converted from time to time is certainly not a proof that what they now believe is true, and I don't get the sense that he's using the intelligence of these people as rhetorical weight to support an argument about the truth of what he believes to be true.

But realize that his stories are not meant to convince atheists like you that what he believes is true, but rather to show you how — in his experience — people (including an apparently sophisticated and intelligent physicist who was once an atheist) come to such a belief.

What He has presented is this vast, complex, and amazing creation of the physical world — which most people know can only be attributed to an intelligent and unseen, higher being.

What I said was, it makes it difficult for an intelligent person to accept.

What makes otherwise intelligent, educated people buy into ancient mumbo jumbo stories?

People meeting an autistic person almost invariably feel that within the strange creature they see there is a hidden person who is intelligent, who can recognize in another what he conceals in himself.

But perhaps any social ethos that rewards perfectly intelligent, well - off, healthy, educated people for being what under normal circumstances would be considered downright stupid, deserves to be damaged.

'' That tells people that I am at least intelligent enough to require proof of existence» = > It does no such thing as you can not claim nor do you have evidence as to what is beyond measurement or accountability by accepted scientific method.

CatholicMom is what every intelligent, free thinking person fears - someone that doens» t have the intelligence to comphrehend freedom of speech.

Leading Boston clergy who attacked the gradual encroachment of the British on New England rights also attacked what they felt were the destructive tendencies of the Great Awakening not only in Jonathan Edwards but especially in his less sophisticated and less intelligent cohorts.26 Puritanism was built upon the centrality of the doctrine of conversion, and in New England it was held that only truly converted people could be accepted into full church membership.

This is how they attract intelligent converts: not with the logic of what they believe, but with people's need not to be isolated.

It seems to me that whether God exists or not is a question not dependent on what people, intelligent or not, believe.

Most people are actually reasonably intelligent, and will say what they feel they have to so you'll leave them alone.

You may disagree with their faith, but there are pretty many extremely intelligent people who believe in God and try to follow what they believe are His teachings.