«It's not a good idea to make this about who's the loudest when it should be about what's in the public interest,» he said.
«This is an area where there can be a tension between
what is in the public interest and what would be in an organisation's commercial interest.»
There is a limited public interest defense available but only if the distribution does not extend beyond
what is in the public interest.
He noted (among other things) the decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Carson v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 338, (2010) 51 EHRR 13 where (referring to its 2006 decision in Stec and others v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, [2006] All ER (D) 215 (Apr)-RRB-, the court said: «Because of their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, the national authorities are in principle better placed than the international judge to appreciate
what is in the public interest on social or economic grounds, and the court will generally respect the legislature's policy choice unless it is «manifestly without reasonable foundation».
Is the ABA — and, in particular, its House of Delegates — the right organization to determine
what is in the public interest?
This statutory presumption has drawn some criticism though: are judges really the best judge of
what is in the public interest?
We are focused on
what is in the public interest.
Just as soon as we can agree on what is excessive and
what is in the public interest.
Not exact matches
What he
's not
interested in is chasing after low - margin jobs or huge
public - sector projects where he has to compete on price with huge global players.
In fact, a recent study in the American Journal of Public Health finds that the EPA «has moved away from the public interest and explicitly favored the interests of the regulated industries,» and is on the slippery slope to what scholars term «regulatory capture,» in which a government agency makes rules in the interest of an industry it's supposed to regulate rather than the publi
In fact, a recent study
in the American Journal of Public Health finds that the EPA «has moved away from the public interest and explicitly favored the interests of the regulated industries,» and is on the slippery slope to what scholars term «regulatory capture,» in which a government agency makes rules in the interest of an industry it's supposed to regulate rather than the publi
in the American Journal of
Public Health finds that the EPA «has moved away from the public interest and explicitly favored the interests of the regulated industries,» and is on the slippery slope to what scholars term «regulatory capture,» in which a government agency makes rules in the interest of an industry it's supposed to regulate rather than the p
Public Health finds that the EPA «has moved away from the
public interest and explicitly favored the interests of the regulated industries,» and is on the slippery slope to what scholars term «regulatory capture,» in which a government agency makes rules in the interest of an industry it's supposed to regulate rather than the p
public interest and explicitly favored the
interests of the regulated industries,» and
is on the slippery slope to
what scholars term «regulatory capture,»
in which a government agency makes rules in the interest of an industry it's supposed to regulate rather than the publi
in which a government agency makes rules
in the interest of an industry it's supposed to regulate rather than the publi
in the
interest of an industry it
's supposed to regulate rather than the
publicpublic.
The group just published their findings
in the Psychological Science
in the
Public Interest, and here
's what they found:
The Arthur Liman
Public Interest Program at Yale first collected data from state and federal corrections officials
in 2014 and again,
in more detail, last year, taking
what amounts to a comprehensive census on the use of solitary confinement
in the U.S. Researchers found that
in the fall of 2015, at least 67,442 U.S. prisoners
were kept
in some kind of restricted housing.
But when a plane crashes, there
is enormous
public and economic
interest in figuring out
what went wrong.
Public market investors generally want to understand your company as a whole —
what your main businesses
are,
what your prospects for growth
are — while strategic buyers may
be more
interested in specific parts of your company that
are complementary.
«His books for the
public seemed to show great respect for his audience, assuming that, even if they didn't fully understand him, they still would
be interested in what a cosmologist had to say about the universe
in all its wonder and strangeness.»
«The other goes at the heart of
what the media
are supposed to
be doing, which
is informing the
public about things that might
be matters of
interest to them but which corporate America might not
be interested in sharing with them.»
Add to that the fact that proper functioning of corporate governance (and hence of capital markets)
is clearly a matter of
public concern, and you have at least the beginnings of a
public -
interest argument for interference
in what would otherwise
be a private matter.
Amazon isn't so much
interested in taking over
what's called the «last mile» of the delivery trek as it
is in making the process more efficient for the company and
public entities that aid
in delivery.
Public Interest Advocacy Centre director John Lawford, who is sitting in on a couple of panels, is perhaps the lone voice of the public — Wind Mobile's two representatives could maybe be included — in what is otherwise an industry love
Public Interest Advocacy Centre director John Lawford, who
is sitting
in on a couple of panels,
is perhaps the lone voice of the
public — Wind Mobile's two representatives could maybe be included — in what is otherwise an industry love
public — Wind Mobile's two representatives could maybe
be included —
in what is otherwise an industry love -
in.
If both businesses and law enforcement give prompt, upfront disclosure of
what technology
is being used and
in what manner, it will make it easier for startups to do business and help ease people's concerns, says Tamir Israel, a staff lawyer with the Canadian Internet Policy and
Public Interest Clinic at the University of Ottawa.
(Heffernan touches on the big - picture disservice
in the media's insidious practice of narrowing our horizons for profit, rather than expanding them
in the
public interest: «[Media companies] know that when we buy a newspaper or a magazine, we aren't looking for a fight... The search for
what is familiar and comfortable underlies our media consumption habits
in just the same way as it makes us yearn for Mom's mac»n' cheese.»)
But it
's what the correspondence reveals about the goals of the investigation that may
be most
in the
public interest.
WYATT: When you combine
what we «
re looking for, that
is interest in public service, not needing
public recognition for your successes, not
being able to share often some of your successes with the people you most love and respect.
All the good works done by religious organizations of all kinds (Christian and otherwise) might get a mention
in a human
interest story sometimes, but decades of this media treatment have skewed
public perceptions of
what faith
is about.
Since then clergy
in many pulpits have articulated
what Washington Gladden
was to call the doctrine of the «socialized individual,» exhorting society to balance capitalism and its emphasis on self -
interest with religion and its traditional emphasis on the
public welfare.
Just knowing the size, the cultural prominence, and the
public influence of the evangelical community, I
was particularly
interested in what the emergence of the ECI and other creation...
It
is more like gossip, peddled to a
public far more
interested in Paula Jones than
in what cuts
in food stamps
are doing to poor children.
That
's what you call a code of ETHICS??? So your employer does something terrible and you have to keep quiet about it even if it
's in the
public interest to know, and you consider it ethical to stay silent?
In future we will
be recommended only to the extent that we have private and
public integrity;
what we say and do makes sense,
is interesting and
is useful; and we
are known to back up
what we say by
what we do, even if it costs us.
But there
is also the reality of monopoly, exercised by large corporate
interests which keep the
public from knowing
what is going on
in their own society.
What is required is the public regulation of the mass media, by reference to standards of worth, in such a manner as to prevent their arbitrary employment for the advantage of private interests, either through deliberate manipulation or through giving the public what it thinks it wa
What is required
is the
public regulation of the mass media, by reference to standards of worth,
in such a manner as to prevent their arbitrary employment for the advantage of private
interests, either through deliberate manipulation or through giving the
public what it thinks it wa
what it thinks it wants.
Consent or liberty
are thus defined not
in relation to
what is common (though not necessarily uniform), but
in relation to
what will promote private
interest or
public utility.
Nevertheless, the press either chose not to understand
what the UNESCO debate
was really all about or purposefully misled the
public about the matter; either way, the U.S. news industry adopted a less than «balanced» approach to the issue
in order to protect its own self -
interest.
That
is not to say there shouldn't
be Christian or other religious values present but it
is to say that people shouldn't
be conned and
public opinion shouldn't
be manipulated by claims of righteous values — as we have seen, it
is just too easy to fake and sway people to support
what may not
be in their best
interests based on having a cloak of religion.
I
'm not
interested in what Obama thinks about the issue because he isn't attempting to put creationism
in the
public schools.
One of the most
interesting categories
in the annual Lead Awards
is «Weblog of the Year» — the list of nominations give you get a feeling of
what topics get a lot of resonance
in the
public eye.
nice to see you crawl out of your hole just
in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he
's gone...
in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point
was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without
being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated
in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming
in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it
was easy to see that this club
was no longer
interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of
being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and
in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to
be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have
been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence
was imperative if the facade
was to continue... it
's for this reason and more that I despise
what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself,
is largely indefensible and this
is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion
in a
public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow
It
's fairly telling that oddsmakers haven't adjusted the spread despite this extreme level of one - sided
public betting, and it will
be interesting to see
what happens when sportsbooks increase their limits later
in the week.
They said the lawsuit poses a challenge to the right of a news organization «to explore matters of obvious
public interest —
what is in the food we eat and how that food
is labeled.»
My kids
are going to
be eating
in a private school cafeteria over summer so I
'm interested to see
what their offerings
are compared to the
public school we attend during the year.
To find out
what those
interests are, the park district monitors enrollment
in programs and requests for programs, and last year conducted its first telephone survey seeking
public opinion.
Just change
what's in them,» said Margo Wootan, head of nutrition policy at the Center for Science
in the
Public Interest, an advocacy group.
What's interesting about this statistic
is that plenty of moms express admiration for celebrities who breastfeed, particularly those who do so
in public or
in professional photo shoots.
I find it very
interesting that you imply that because you have
been published
in medical journals that means that your scientific data
is the one that
is correct, if
public media attention on your research
is what you feel solidifies it as «right» then wouldn't you have to say that scientific data on the other end of the spectrum that has
been published
is «right» as well.
Every morning, I struggle with
what to send my two boys for lunch at their downtown
public schools — something healthy and
interesting that can
be packed
in a small bag (and eaten
in about 10 minutes).
In fact, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, or CSPI, has published a post about how Beech Nut is doing the right thing in telling consumers exactly what they're buying, and that other manufacturers should follow sui
In fact, the Center for Science
in the Public Interest, or CSPI, has published a post about how Beech Nut is doing the right thing in telling consumers exactly what they're buying, and that other manufacturers should follow sui
in the
Public Interest, or CSPI, has published a post about how Beech Nut
is doing the right thing
in telling consumers exactly what they're buying, and that other manufacturers should follow sui
in telling consumers exactly
what they
're buying, and that other manufacturers should follow suit.
What's amazing
is that we have
been able to stand up to corporate
interests in the name of
public health.»
«Unfortunately, and shamefully, consideration of
what was in the
public's best
interest, rather than the political
interest of the decision makers,
was a matter of militant indifference to them.»
«I think as far as politicians
are concerned they should do
what they
are elected to do - represent the
public, act
in the national
interest and listen to views from a whole range of people.
Condi
was supported by others earlier as
being a shock and awe VP choice.It won't happen.She has expressed no
interest in being a
public candidate, and likely would
be very bad at it.
In many ways, she
is a delicate flower; and would not easily survive
in the political garden of vipers.And
what would she add to the GOP ticket?A slight tick up for black voters?