Sentences with phrase «what issues the courts»

The amount of time in a typical day spent on either one of those tasks ebbs and flows depending on whether the courts are in session, what issues the courts are granting for briefing, whether oral argument is being granted, and so on.

Not exact matches

Top executives at Uber used the encrypted chat app Wickr to hold secret conversations, current and former workers testified in court this week, setting up what could be the first major legal test of the issues raised by the use of encrypted apps inside companies.

Jackson did not speak directly to the issue when summoned, though he elaborated in the court filing: «Just because I am photographed in or next to a certain vehicle, wearing an article of clothing, holding a product, sitting next to what appears to be large sums of money or modeling expensive pieces of jewelry does not mean that I own everything in those photos,» he wrote.

Singh, who has long stood in opposition to the project on the grounds that it was approved under what he calls flawed environmental assessment rules adopted by the previous Conservative government, said Wednesday the Trudeau government should, in tandem with B.C., ask the Supreme Court for a reference to resolve what he calls jurisdictional issues.

Jagmeet Singh, meanwhile, waded into the impasse in Ottawa by proposing that the Trudeau Liberals work with the British Columbia government on a joint reference question to the Supreme Court of Canada, fast - tracking a resolution to what the federal NDP leader calls jurisdictional issues arising from B.C.'s objections to the project.

In an August 10, 2009 hearing before Judge Rakoff in a case involving alleged disclosure issues at Bank of America (bac), Rakoff responded to the SEC's evasiveness by stating: «You are not going to be particularly effective with this court by telling me what I already know, namely, that you filed a rather uninformative bare bones complaint.»

What it might mean for entrepreneurs: Immigration policy is one of the country's most divisive issues right now, and the court's ruling underscores how important the debate remains.

The lawsuit was filed a week after Mr. Cohen initiated arbitration proceedings, but the court papers did not say what was at issue or refer to the restraining order.

British Columbia is doing exactly what a lawful jurisdiction does, which is asking for the jurisdictional issue to go to the courts to be decided.

«If you think for a moment that I'm going to stay my hand because your guy is taking the Fifth Amendment, and not issue a preliminary injunction to shut down what happened here, you're wrong,» U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup said, according to the transcript.

Finally, Cook says that the FBI is proposing what Apple is calling «unprecedented use» of the All Writs Act of 1789, which authorizes federal courts to issue all orders necessary or appropriate «in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.»

What availed as the common wisdom of mankind until the day before yesterday — for example, that man, woman, mother, and father name natural realities as well as social roles, that children issue naturally from their union, that the marital union of man and woman is the foundation of human society and provides the optimal home for the flourishing of children — all this is now regarded by many as obsolete and even hopelessly bigoted, as court after court, demonstrating that this revolution has profoundly transformed even the meaning of reason itself, has declared that this bygone wisdom now fails even to pass the minimum legal threshold of rational cogency.

(Most recently, the D.C. Court of Appeals issued an important but nuanced ruling in what Religion Clause's Howard Friedman calls the government's test case, Gilardi v. HHS.)

That is what the defenders of conjugal marriage are saying after the brace of Supreme Court rulings issued yesterday on challenges to that truth that is as old as the human race, that marriage is between a man and a woman.

The evangelical - moralist sector has gained access to the White House, the Supreme Court, the Congress; it has a near - monopoly on mass media religion news, popular religion, the production of religious celebrities; it makes clear its positions on what it calls social issues, and is engaged in calling for constitutional amendments and new laws and in protests in the public squares.

The case of Paul Boe — a minister found guilty of contempt of court for refusing to testify about what he saw at Wounded Knee — poses some significant legal and theological problems with some wider implications of the clergy confidentiality issue.

Yahoo won't talk about it, and the Mexican courts are keeping silent on the issue, so just what they did that blew up so expensively is a mystery.

What are the key on - court issues that'll tilt the scales of these Finals in the eyes of both fan bases?

And for that, because the laws in all these areas are so different and because they change all the time, I really do think that if you want to have a contract then you need to go to a lawyer who is a family lawyer, who is also really familiar with lesbian and gay and bisexual and transgender law, who will understand what the issues are and what you might need to put into this agreement, and who can also tell you when you may or may not hold up in court and what the risks and the benefits are.

Let's explore what decisions need to be reflected in your visitation transportation plan, what circumstances might require the use of a neutral drop - off location, and how to handle transportation refusal so the issue doesn't come back to hurt you in court.

The court system will look at this communication when there are issues brought forth to the court, and both parties will be held responsible for what they are communicating with the other person.

There are treaties and treatises out there that inform efforts to articulate what constitutes international law, but there is no world legislature out there, and there is no court with the power to issue decisions to any country in the world that will be observed without the use of military force on a wide array of issues.

What happens if that if one of the candidates successfully argues in court that mistakes in the count (or any other irregularity or technical issue) had an effect big enough to change the result of the election, a new one is held.

This, according to them was because «the issue that came before the Supreme Court was simply constitutional interpretation so for (with all respect) the learned judge (Justice Jones Dotse) to go beyond the constitutional interpretation and then decide that the applicant had no contract with the government and therefore the applicant had no case and that the applicant had formed an alliance to create, loot and share was beyond what was before the business of the Supreme Court.»

Though lawmakers were pleased with what they said was progress being made on the issue — which has split the Legislature over which charges should be tried in either diversion court or a family court — there was no indication either majority conference embraced the latest language.

«We welcome the fact that the court has narrowed what was a wide - ranging claim to just one issue.

All the issues about entry on to the premises of Parliament, the searching of parliamentary offices and constituency correspondence and what is, or should be, available to the court can be considered by the Speaker's Committee, which the House agreed should start its work after the criminal proceedings had come to a conclusion.

Sampson, D - Brooklyn, was driving to work in his state - issued Ford Taurus at around 4 a.m. this morning in advance of what the spokesman said was a long day at court.

Maverick boxer Braimah Kamoko popularly known as Bukom Banku is engaging in what could pass for Hide - and - seek, old and popular children's game with police investigators after an Accra Circuit court 7 issued a bench warrant for his arrest.

In 2010, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that dramatically changed campaign finance laws, removing the cap on what outside groups, like the NRA, can spend to influence elections.

But the issues being raised now could portend what future court appeals may look like.

«Isn't this part of a much bigger issue which is there is growing anger in what she calls the court of public opinion not just about the pension and renumeration of what are now public sector employees but about other public sector fat cats including senior civil servants and dare I say it ministers about their very lavish and generous pension?»

But what I don't understand is how issues that were not before the Court of Appeal became issues before the Supreme Court.

Irrespective of what the High courts say, for or against Senator Ali Modu Sheriff or Senator Ahmed Makarfi, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court are still there to adjudicate on the issues, and it could become a circus show.

For too long and on too many issues, the party's leadership has set out its stall as a function of what other parties might find acceptable — the ugliest example being secret courts, where conference was told explicitly that Liberal Democrats shouldn't oppose the illiberal use of secret evidence, because both Tories and Labour support it.

This issue is what led President Obama to call on Congress to reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to include a public advocate to offer a critical voice on Government arguments.

He commended the court for turning down what he termed «obvious unlawful application to issue warrant of arrest», and for directing the prosecuting authority to appropriately serve a copy of the charge on him.

The ruling came three days after Mr. de Blasio, in his State of the City speech, predicted a court victory on the issue, and criticized what he called the «landlord lobby» for being behind the legal action and a separate court challenge to a rent freeze approved by the Rent Guidelines Board.

Haruna Iddrisu also raised what he termed constitutional issues and strongly registered his disapproval to portions of the agreement which demand that disputes relating to the agreement shall not be referred to local or international court.

Mike Derrick, a Democrat, engaged in what his campaign referred to as a «full court press» in the final week before Election Day, including a whirlwind schedule that saw him stump at over a dozen locations around the state's largest congressional district, including Willsboro, where he hammered Stefanik on residency issues and the role of outside money in politics.

«What is more alarming about this issue is Marin Alamisi Amidu understands clearly that Alfred Agbesi Woyome never sued the court on an inoperative agreement signed in 2006.

Sports News of Friday, 11 May 2018 Source: mynewsgh.com Bukom Banku is wanted by the police for assaulting the Assemblyman of Amamomo Electoral Area Maverick boxer Braimah Kamoko popularly known as Bukom Banku is engaging in what could pass for Hide - and - seek, old and popular children's game with police investigators after an Accra Circuit court 7 issued a bench warrant for his arrest.

At issue is whether a court errs by refusing to consider whether and to what extent laws that restrict abortion for the stated purpose of promoting health actually serve the government's interest in promoting health.

But Van der Bruggen says he understands that the court chose to avoid what is essentially a political issue.

Apart from the obvious idiocy of using common sense to resolve complex issues, the court's call to apply «knowledge of the world» to the evidence is exactly what Bayesian math does.

So therefore, I would suggest that if they really believe that to be the case, they should immediately push for the impeachment of both the President and both houses of Congress which are willing to ignore such an obvious threat to the continued existence of humanity and instead waste time on (what this relegates to) trivial issues like Iraq, Social Security, Medicare, taxes, terrorism, fiscal budget deficits, Katrina, abortion, Bird flu, the Supreme Court, education, etc..

Regardless of the type of legal proceeding or which side uses scientific evidence, the forensic scientist must be able to write a report and testify under oath about: what facts or items of evidence were analyzed or tested; what tests or analyses were used; how valid or reliable those tests or analyses have been found to be by other courts; why and how the forensic scientist was qualified to conduct those tests or analyses; and, what the results of the tests or analyses were and how those results are relevant to the issues in dispute.

The Court of Special Appeals reversed the circuit court on both issues, which it is what iCourt of Special Appeals reversed the circuit court on both issues, which it is what icourt on both issues, which it is what it is.

The court said it would use a police - brutality case from Oklahoma to re-examine the issue of under what circumstances local governments can be held liable when one of their employees violates a person's constitutional rights.

Plaintiffs» closing arguments PowerPoint, presented in court on the last day of the Vergara v. California, sums up what's at issue and what's at stake in the historic education equality case.