Sentences with phrase «what judge hears your case»

Not exact matches

In an August 10, 2009 hearing before Judge Rakoff in a case involving alleged disclosure issues at Bank of America (bac), Rakoff responded to the SEC's evasiveness by stating: «You are not going to be particularly effective with this court by telling me what I already know, namely, that you filed a rather uninformative bare bones complaint.»

As the Judge would summarize the case and after he listened to all the witnesses and heard arguments from the lawyers, I would think, he is going to find this guy guilty, and then the Judge starts talking another way and then I think ooohh he is going to find this guy not guilty...... then the Judge keeps talking and then I think, I have no idea what his finding is going to be....

In the case of this lady, the correct Islamic punishment is for the judge to ask her co-workers to renounce what they heard her say in order to save her life.

God «judges» the righteous and the wicked, meaning He hears their cases and decides what do in each case.

They have not told us who the mediators or judges are, how many cases have been heard or what measures are in place to protect women.

Judge Caproni interviewed each prospective juror, and made it clear that she would not strike jurors if they said they could set aside what they had heard, and consider the case fairly and with an open mind.

Before this even premiered its first trailer, anyone that heard of its existence already started to judge it and in some cases chastise it for what they «knew» was going to happen.

If you choose to file a chapter 13 case in which you repay your creditors what you can afford over 3 to 5 years, you may also want help with preparing your chapter 13 plan and with the confirmation hearing on your plan which, if held, will be before a bankruptcy judge.

By placing the responsibility upon the case management judge for explaining the process and otherwise advising the self - represented litigant on what to expect, the hearing judge will be supported in balancing ``... the sometimes competing imperatives of helping a litigant who is in need of assistance while maintaining impartiality.»

In addition to ensuring that the matter is ready to proceed to a contested hearing, the case management judge is specifically tasked ``... to explain the process and to otherwise advise the self - represented litigant what may be expected.»

Still, one can't help but wonder what litigants» reaction would be if they learned that the judge hearing their case has this requirement hanging over his head.

Assuming for the sake of the argument that Google's motion succeeds and that Judge Posner forms part of the panel ultimately hearing this case, what would this mean for the likely outcome?

The staff can not tell you whether or not you should sue someone, recommend any specific attorney or law firm, give you an opinion about your case or predict how a judge might rule, talk to a judge on your behalf, or tell you what words to use in your court papers or at a court hearing.

The judges I've interviewed over the years give various responses to the question, but what I most often hear is this: a precise description of the questions presented in the case or the statement of the issues.

On at least three different occasions during the hour and a half negotiation either I or the opposing attorney asked for language in the agreement based on nothing more than our clear expectation that the family court judges could not be expected to follow case law on what is a change of circumstances or not giving precedential value to a temporary order at the final hearing.

Toward the end of Samsung's brief I found a quote from what Judge Koh said at an April 29, 2013 hearing in this case:

The Small Claims Tribunal has heard a total of 59 cases from inception to September 18, 2008 (30 in 2007 and the remainder in 2008) and all cases were successfully resolved by agreement between parties after what was essentially a mediation procedure before the Small Claims Tribunal Judge.

The biggest problem facing the ongoing Oracle v. Google retrial is that Judge Alsup doesn't seem to have swallowed the fact that the IP - specialized Federal Circuit found it hard to believe how one could get copyright law as wrong as he did in this case («confused» is what one of the appellate judges said at the December 2013 hearing).

The dispute sets up what could be an unprecedented hearing at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse in the coming months involving a panel of district judges hearing the multiple criminal cases at once.

Now, in what lower appeal court judges have called a «most troubling appeal» and a «most unfortunate circumstance,» the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday the case that asks when and under what circumstances a judge can copy the submissions of a party without attribution.

After the changes in 2006 the Lord Chief Justice is responsible for deciding where judges sit and what cases they hear.

What this means is that you can file your case and get heard by a judge on the same day if and only if you file your case by 8:30 AM on any weekday.

If, at the beginning of the protection hearing the parents and social worker can't agree on what should happen next, the judge will order that a case conference take place.

Unlike most small claims court cases heard throughout the country, there is certainly no meaningful way to appeal what any of these TV judges decree.

Try writing out an explanation of what it means that you could offer to a judge in the hearing of any case in which the use of the term is relevant.

Your case then goes before a district court judge, or what is called a formal hearing.

Meanwhile, the patent court's recalcitrant judges could receive another scolding this spring when the Supreme Court hears a key case over what can and can't be patented.

If you have settled your case yourself outside of court, you and / or your lawyers will still have to go to court once — at what is usually called a final hearing or a prove - up — to ask the judge to sign your final divorce papers.

The hearings are not actually hearings however, because what actually happens is the Judge assigned to the case reviews the court file in chambers.

What you would get in a trial would depend on what county you are in and what judge was hearing your cWhat you would get in a trial would depend on what county you are in and what judge was hearing your cwhat county you are in and what judge was hearing your cwhat judge was hearing your case.

But parties have to feel confident that the mediator is, in fact, impartial and will not repeat what was said to the judge hearing the case or even to the other party.