Sentences with phrase «what judicial opinions»

It explains what judicial opinions are, how they are structured, and what you should look for when you read them.

Not exact matches

Just what is «argle - bargle,» and why would any appellate justice — much less one of Justice Scalia's stature — use such a phrase in a momentous judicial opinion?

This is a concise, yet thorough, summary of what law clerks need to know before writing their first judicial opinion.

The purpose of this annotated Bibliography is to assist professional legal writers in easily locating writing about judicial opinion writing and deciding what might be useful for them.

Courts have a harder time making these distinctions because judicial conventions mandate that they give reasons to support their opinions, and what principled reason could there be for giving 50 of the 1,000 rights of marriage but not another 25 or 100 or all of them?

What characterises a judicial finding for these purposes is that it is an opinion of a court or other tribunal whose responsibility is to reach conclusions based solely on the evidence before it.

The fourth article, «Understanding Voice: Writing in a Judicial Context,» by Andrea McArdle, introduces us to judicial voice, and does so by leading off with a number of questions, including «does a judicial opinion have a «voice,» and if so, what are its attJudicial Context,» by Andrea McArdle, introduces us to judicial voice, and does so by leading off with a number of questions, including «does a judicial opinion have a «voice,» and if so, what are its attjudicial voice, and does so by leading off with a number of questions, including «does a judicial opinion have a «voice,» and if so, what are its attjudicial opinion have a «voice,» and if so, what are its attributes?

Students will also practice basic lawyering skills to provide a taste of what they would do in law school or as lawyers, including reading and interpreting constitutional provisions, statutes, or regulations, reading and understanding judicial opinions, and mapping out and making basic forms of legal arguments.

There's 255 million documents in the Fastcase and Docket Alarm databases, and so, we have a ton of information about judges or law firms or clients, and so armed with the kind of whole legal database of judicial opinions and statutes, all of the motions and pleadings from the Docket Alarm database and then all of the metadata about filings in PACER, what the pace of things were, when they happened.

Also in this section (pages 7 - 9 of the slip opinion), the Court applied what I would describe a «realistic litigator» analysis (which Justice Scalia often employs to reject claims of «future bad law» effects) to habeas lawyers» likely moves, and expressed the majority's «doubt that any more judicial time will be wasted» than would be the case under the dissent's alternative vision.

What an efficient method of surveying selective commentary on judicial opinions.