Sentences with phrase «what kind of claims»

They may be able to tell you which Texas rental coverage provider has worked the best for them and what kind of claims they have submitted.

Insurers are able to determine what kind of claims you are likely to file in the future based on the vehicle you drive.

More specifically, if 5 % of your population (urban land) is represented by 50 % of your sampling, and if 95 % of your population (rural land) is represented by the other 50 % of your sample, What kind of claims can you make about difference between the two?

We pulled together some statistics to show just what your chances are of making a claim on a travel insurance policy, and what kind of claims are typically filed.

Insurers are able to determine what kind of claims you are likely to file in the future based on the vehicle you drive.

In such case, consider a thorough analysis of what individual superfoods offer and what kind of claims you can make.

First of all, think about what kind of claims you want to make on your packaging.

With 2.2 billion children in the world receiving at least 1 gift per Christmas, one can imagine how many packages and labels accompany the gifts and what kinds of claims, ingredients and instructions must be present.

People should not try to handle a motorcycle accident case on their own in Omaha because they lack experience, have never dealt with an insurance adjuster before, and are not going to know what kind of claim they should make.

We will help you understand the law and what kind of claim may benefit you most.

Your Motorcycle Accident Lawyer ensures there is an in - depth investigation of your accident to determine who is at fault and what kind of a claim you are entitled to: a Tort Claim or an Accident Benefits Claim.

Not exact matches

What kind of research supports the marketing claims so often conveyed through consumer product commercials?

Also, there is no substantial law on who can claim what objects or resources in space, beyond the 1967 Outer Space Treaty that declared space open for most kinds of exploitation, so long as «states» clean up their mess, leaving no contamination or dangerous objects that could harm others.

This does not mean you need to put any kind of cap on how much you spend on, for example, travel and entertainment, providing you limit the amount you claim to what is allowed, but it does mean you should be prepared for a visit from the IRS if those numbers are uncommonly high.

What it will need to overcome, if it is to succeed, is a kind of «can't do» attitude that has developed over the years, which has made the agency timid about tackling any issue that is likely to prompt strong industry resistance and all too ready to accept unfounded industry claims about the likely impact of regulations.

How does he feel entitled to make any claim to be a better Catholic than Santorum (for that is what he's implicitly claiming) on questions that the church rightly leaves to the prudential judgment of voters and public officials, within broad boundaries, when in the next breath he confesses his complete failure to be any kind of Catholic at all on a question on which the church speaks with categorical moral authority?

Heidegger's characteristic claim in Sein und Zeit is that there are always three horizons of the disclosure space called temporality which could have this kind of fundamental role in determining what to mean by «be».

By contrast the second kind of argument mounted under the banner of process hermeneutics supports a claim that such - and - such a tenet of process theology is «Biblical theology» in the sense of being compatible with what some Biblical texts say on a theological topic.

HeavenSent What kind of ego does it take to claim to «know» that God actually exists and what he thiWhat kind of ego does it take to claim to «know» that God actually exists and what he thiwhat he thinks?

Now the claim that could appropriately be advanced on behalf of this form of panpsychism in respect of considerations of parsimony would be that it does with fewer kinds of entity what it would be vain to do with more — that it does with one kind of entity what the dualist only achieves with two.

I claim thet you are in no way qualified to say what kind of love everyone else feels.

down about what exactly they mean when they make these kind of claims.

Any dangers in renouncing inerrancy were largely imaginary, Beegle claimed; one must let the «facts» of Scripture show straightforwardly what kind of book it is and that will suffice.

Hauerwas claims that «by being that kind of community we see that the church helps the world understand what it means to be the world» (PK 100).

Niebuhr's statement implies no relativism, in which somehow everything is true, but rather a kind of believing agnosticism, in which there is no claim to know what else is true or false besides one's own belief.

What if this «God» is not what he claims and is an insecure, delusional fallen spirit from another dimension, lying to us for the sake of reassuring him that he is almighty (kind of like Kim Jong Un and his fathWhat if this «God» is not what he claims and is an insecure, delusional fallen spirit from another dimension, lying to us for the sake of reassuring him that he is almighty (kind of like Kim Jong Un and his fathwhat he claims and is an insecure, delusional fallen spirit from another dimension, lying to us for the sake of reassuring him that he is almighty (kind of like Kim Jong Un and his father)?

Sure if I exclude myself — cool... but if the person people claim is God is doing it... what kind of god is this?

Callahan writes: «What a free ride this is for the researchers, whose claims of potential benefits are treated with the kind of deference and credulity not seen since the days when the golden calf was worshipped.

Clearly they are claiming some kind of correspondence between what they attribute to others and what the others wrote.

By faith however, I do seem to experience a kind of «certainty» or confidence but it is contingent on a whole matrix of relationships in progress and so while I can be passionate about the meaning I am making about those relationships, those relationships are always outstripping my meanings (claims) and revealing more about what meaning is possible.

Now then, if you are claiming an atheist does not believe in right or wrong, what kind of right and wrong do you mean?

What they show, I think, is that whatever may be the ultimate meaning - status of the function «X is a powerless actuality» and Premise X, Griffin is clearly supposing that they have some kind of surface meaning — enough to permit an investigation of their logical connections to one another and to the claim that actual beings are completely determinable.

They add their «Rock» or religion to everything and claim thats what helps the poor and feeds the hungry or houses the homeless, but it's really the other ingredients i.e. the kind hearted people reaching out to help that gives them the facade of helpfulness.

What it really comes down to, is that on a rational level, the rudeness of delivery has nothing to do with reason or truthfulness, unless one is claiming their belief makes them more loving and kind, then rudeness would seem to negate that claim.

Before I have a pint with 50 Ft Underwear, I got ta say that if Rubio sits on a science committee and makes a stupid claim about the age of the earth, then I have to wonder what other kinds of numbers he's screwing up.

What kind of stupid argument is it to cast aspersions onto the scientific method because YOU can't put up any demonstrable proof for the philosophy that you claim is more than mere philosophy?

(Isa 8:20 NIV)» this verse is the bases for Bible interpretation,,, it identifies the guidelines,,, in other words,,, the Bible can't contradict itself,,, nor can anyone who claims to be bearing the message of God contradict with the Bible,,, so if the Bible tells me that (Soddom and Gomorrah had sinned,,, and in many other parts of the Bible Perversion is called by its name) then what King David says here needs to be understood in a figurative way,,, here is a suggestion,,, a Man lets down his defenses infront of his wife,,, he is absolutely offguard around her,,, his love towards his wife, is a mixture of love, respect, endless trust,,, and this kind of love was what David had towards Jonathan,,, he knew he could count on him, he knew, he didn't have to fear anything around him, he knew,,, «as the verse states» that he loved him as himself!

Thermo Fisher Scientific has launched what it claims is a new, first - of - its - kind metal detection platform that finds previously undetectable metal contaminants.

People like you will point at what Sir Chips said and claim Wenger is some kind of god and will never be questioned...

If you are an Arsenal fan and you really claim to want Arsenal to succeed, better check yourself first and determine what kind of fan you are because one thing is for sure.

What ticks me off is that you repeatedly post this kind of crap as fact without checking your links for the source of their claims.

The Affinity Stroller by Britax isn't my kind of stroller but from what my sister says and what most reviews claim I can be tempted to use it any day.

I am just wondering what kind of evidence you have for these claims as they seem to not match the anecdotal evidence I have observed.

Personally, I find it rather ironic that you're lecturing the blog author on the rigor of language, when, faced with the need to support the claims made by a documentary that has faced absolutely no real standards of intellectual rigor or merit (the kind of evidence you apparently find convincing), you have so far managed to produce a study with a sample size too small to conclude anything, a review paper that basically summarized well known connections between vaginal and amniotic flora and poor outcomes in labor and birth before attempting to rescue what would have been just another OB review article with a few attention grabbing sentences about long term health implications, and a review article published in a trash journal.

What McCoy had done in Huntington was exactly the kind of thing Republicans claim to celebrate.

We need to understand, for example, why Rousseau claimed that Corsica was the only European society capable of being just in The Social Contract, and what relation contemporary republican proposals stand in to his apparent utopianism, both as a critical perspective and as a kind of lament.

Pettit claims that valuing freedom as non-domination requires what he calls «contestatory democracy», which, in addition to being democratic in the sense of having governments selected through some kind of formally egalitarian political process, should satisfy a further three conditions.

I guess what I want to claim, however, is that this kind of «real utopian» work depends to some extent on some other work of a purely utopian nature, work that clarifies ultimate values.

There is no widely agreed definition of what constitutes «a people»; in general, though, the term generally denote [s] a kind of collective identity that is grounded in a shared history and culture and may or may not lay claim to some kind of political recognition as well as a specific territory.

«Stray too far into condemning what he called «phoney human rights concerns» and Cameron will damage his claim to be a different kind of Tory.