``... What do you do if nations disagree about
what kind of climate they want...» is no more an issue for geoengineering than it is for truly effective Kyoto - like agreements.
Who knows
what kind of climate our «great grandchildren» will want in 100 years even if we were able to change it, which itself is far from certain?
And for all its complexity, the core of this problem can be stated simply enough
what kind of a climate transition would be fair enough to actually work?
The third is less widely known but should be front - and - center: It is well - known among people who study such things that, human civilization has seen several warm periods and several cold periods all within the span of recorded history and the archeological record timeframe, so we have a pretty good understanding of
what each kind of climate change bodes for mankind.
«Our results can be used as a tool in climate modelling to show
us what kind of climate we can expect at the turn of the next century.
9th GCF Board meeting in Songdo, South Korea: Why 2015 will determine
what kind of climate fund the GCF will be
The important question isn't what impact will climate change have on geopolitics, but rather how geopolitics will shape
what kind of climate change we get.
And once you open the Pandora's box of geoengineered climate, what do you do if nations disagree about
what kind of climate they want, or if some poor nation objects to suffering drought in order to cancel heat waves in Chicago?
Do the like a warm or cold climate or do they have to accept our view
what kind of climate they should like?
What kind of climate does it like, etc..?
Not exact matches
For the 2018 letter, the couple opted to organize their thoughts in the form
of frequently asked questions about their priorities, how the current political
climate is impacting the organization, how they decide where to donate funds and
what kind of thought goes into their corporate partnerships.
It was this period where the larger firms were trying to figure out
what to do in this
kind of economic
climate.
He usually wants to know two
kinds of things: factual information about the child, and
what the emotional
climate of the home is like — its positive resources and its problems.
Well, maybe not all those drastic moves but
what you're about to read will probably make you a little scared for the
kind of social
climate our kids will face as they enter high school.
Topics • Positive home
climate • Simple rules to help stop trouble before it starts • Power struggles —
what, how, why and when not to engage • Six critical life messages • Discipline and punishment — why one works and the other only appears to work • RSVP — reasonable, simple, valuable, practical consequences • Mistakes, mischief and mayhem • Three
kinds of families — brick wall, jellyfish and backbone • Keeping your cool without putting your feelings on ice • Buffering children from sexual promiscuity, drug abuse and suicideType your paragraph here.
Now it may not be, you know, the solution to
climate change but I think that there will be probably some form
of progress made here whether it's an agreement to
kind of pre-agree on
what a treaty might look like or if it's progress on reducing deforestation and other issues that the country seem to be a lot closer to agreement on.
But one
of the things that I have been very impressed by here is a lot
of the stories
of hope; many folks have traveled a long way to share
what they are doing on a very local level to help combat
climate change, and that's everything from,
kind of, rural electrification in Africa and India, you know, bringing light to people who are still using dung or coal for cooking and heating and dying from indoor air pollution to, you know, major renewable energy projects, say, here in Denmark where they now get 20 percent
of their electricity from wind power.
To get some idea
of what climate change will likely mean for the reefs, the World Heritage Centre asked coral experts at NOAA and elsewhere to produce
what they claim is a first
of its
kind study «that scientifically quantifies the scale
of the issue, makes a prediction
of where the future lies, and indicates effects up to the level
of individual sites,» says Fanny Douvere, marine program coordinator at the center.
The Problem: Project organizers would love to collect
climate data in each
of the 1,000 homes where volunteers are sampling microbes, to see how environmental conditions affect
what kind of microbes they find.
«Because
of Australia's isolation it becomes a tool to make predictions about
what kinds of things are likely to happen during
climate change,» Archer says.
The research group will further investigate
what kind of microclimates the species need for survival.The maps can be used not only for further
climate and forest research, but also for conservation and land - use planning.
Roe and his U.W. co-author, atmospheric physicist Marcia Baker, argue in Science that, because
of this inherent
climate effect, certainty is a near impossibility, no matter
what kind of improvements are made in understanding physical processes or the timescale
of observations.
«Before we go looking for life, we're trying to figure out
what kinds of planets could have a
climate that's conducive to life,» del Genio said.
Keen not to jump to conclusions about the source
of the warming in the early 1830s, Abram and her colleagues used
climate models to examine
what kinds of external factors could be responsible.
«
What our research shows is that this
kind of heat has become more common and will continue to get more common in the future,» said Andrew King, a fellow at the ARC Centre
of Excellence for
Climate System Science in Melbourne and one
of the report's authors.
AP: I think there are elements
of this business that are inherently local, and our philosophy
of designing and assortment is to design a global assortment that is a super set
of what a different geography might actually need, in terms
of fashion trends, sensibility,
climate and those
kinds of things.
What's more is that debt becomes manageable in this
kind of climate, until
of course, it's not.
But after about maybe a month
of talking, we found that there were a lot
of similarities in
what we were thinking about the state
of the world: The environment, the political
climate, all those
kind of things.
So the title Fast Forward came in part from an article I read on Keith Haring, that was talking about the
climate, this moment, in the early 1980s in particular and more generally, and that there was this idea that there was suddenly a
kind of new freedom for artists to paint
what you want.
What kinds of international agreements could effectively limit risks related to human - driven global warming, either by blunting human contributions to
climate change or building resilience to hazards related to changing conditions?
What kind of effect do fires, like the current one in Australia, have on
climate.
In light
of what it considers national security risks posed by
climate change, the government
of Nicaragua has formed the Ecological Battalion, a first -
of - its -
kind team
of soldiers dedicated to combating against environmental threats.
[Response: I wasn't trying to suggest that tacit knowledge was some
kind of opinion that all scientists must agree with, but rather it is the shared background that, say, everyone using
climate models has — i.e. why we use initial condition ensembles, how we decide that a change in the code is significant,
what data comparisons are appropriate etc..
This is exactly
what Climate Change looks like as it's IMPACTS are happening in the real world (versus in the scientific theory papers)-- all
kind sof unexpected unplanned for extreme events and a built infrastructure and building not up to the extreme demands
of topdays extreme weather events across an entire Continent.
This debate is about your pocketbook, it's about your job, it's about whether you can still afford health care, whether we're going to do something about
climate change or not,
what kind of world your kids are going to be living in in ten or fifteen years, how are we going to respond to peak oil, where is the next transistor economy going to come from?
What's important, to my mind, is not to confuse this
kind of normal, healthy scientific debate with more basic understanding
of human contributions to, and responses to,
climate change.
We are talking about
what I call a
climate change
of the second
kind: a change in how heat is moved around the
climate system.
Owners can choose
what kind of insulation and heating and cooling options suit them and their local
climate, whereas RVs are generally not built to be lived in during the winter (though
of course, one could tow it somewhere warm).
Regardless
of what we think about D - O events, I am in complete agreement with Stefan that there is no evidence
of any
kind at present that the present
climate suffers any
kind of initial - condition sensitivity that would compromise the value
of projections
of response
of statistical quantities to increases in GHG's.
And I second
what Glenn Landers (# 10) wrote: «I'm all in favor
of these
kinds of efforts because they educate the public about the dire need to deal with
climate change, but to get to where we need to be will require a whole lot more.»
The idea is to work the math in terms
of world geography — areas where there is a reasonably moderate
climate, and relatively sustainable resources, where we can choose
what kind of technology we deploy, balanced against local population.
In the
climate arena, I think for too long, people have used numbers like «two degrees» or «350» to give a
kind of mechanistic determinant to
what needs to be done, when, in fact, when you look behind those numbers, it really is much more about choices.
Here it's stated as a «
what if»
kind of assessment — there is no attempt to get «objective probabilities for future events out
of a
climate model» as it is stated above.
By contrast,
climate «skeptics» are usually
of the «I do nt like the policy options, therefore
climate science is wrong» or «not
what my tribe believes»
kind.
We can at least check to see
what kinds of trends
climate models produce.
But I had been focused on
climate and humans since 1984, when I began reporting
what would end up being a long cover story for Science Digest magazine assessing nuclear winter,
kind of the inverse potential human impact on
climate (global cooling from a pall
of smoke rising from incinerated cities).
In light
of what it considers a national security risk posed by
climate change, the government
of Nicaragua has formed the Ecological Battalion, a first -
of - its -
kind team
of soldiers dedicated to combating against environmental threats.
(I'm moderating a discussion
of climate policy between Michael Levi
of the Council on Foreign Relations and Joe Romm, the Climateprogress blogger, and I gave an opening talk on communicating
what I see as the story
of our time — the human transition through a
kind of species - scale, puberty - style growth spurt to whatever comes next.)
He withdrew any
kind of bipartisan support for an ETS (and more)» «two years ago Canadians gave majority government to Stephen Harper's Conservatives, who were pledged to a sensible use
of its resources, so Australians have now elected a government with a pragmatic attitude on global warming» «Led by Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary
of the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change, an attempt was made, by
what can only be described as alarmists, to exploit these fires for the purposes
of the global warming debate.
I really don't understand
what kind of point Roger Pielke Jr. was trying to make, but it appears to be a subtle attempt to slander coverage
of climate change.