Sentences with phrase «what kind of law»

At the end of the day, people are going to be hired and fired regardless of what kind of law I practice.

I asked what kind of law she wants to practice, and she replied «something that will pay.»

They will have role models to look up to regardless of what kind of law they envision themselves practicing, something not as readily available to my cohort or its predecessors.

It is also important to know what kind of law firm culture existing, including traditions, social behaviors of the members of the firm, whether the firm tends to be more conservative or innovative, and the basic demographics of the law firm that might create more than one law firm identity within the larger firm culture.

When you first start your search for an attorney brochure, you are probably going to think of several questions, including: What kind of law firm brochure do I really need?

So again, it depends on what kind of law you practice.

Sam Glover: Just to throw a little [lawyery 00: 23: 27] stuff in here though, I think depending on who you're talking with and who your client is and what kind of law it is, you may be creating a record that then comes up for discovery issues, and so it's at least worth thinking about before you do that, but to the extent it's really just an attorney client communication, I think you're totally right.

So try this: Ask yourself what kind of law you really, really want to practice.

How far do you have to read to determine what kind of law you practice?

Responding to insureds about coverage questions involves more than reviewing what kind of law they practise or how many hours they bill each year.

Meyerson added that when he asked young law firm recruits what kind of law they wanted to practice, he was often disappointed by their answers.

Depending on what kind of law you practice, those client confidences may be benign.

«Tell me about your employer» or «what kind of law does your firm practice?»

Your website's practice area page — the page on which you explain what kind of law you practice — has a big job to do.

What kind of law is it when you say that if 1 player loses his head, regardless of the actions of the team, the whole team needs to be punished.

(The British colonial government hadn't asked them, or any other Nigerians, what kind of law they wanted.)

What kind of laws (if any) would an anarchical society have?

And I don't know what kind of laws and regulations would apply.

What kinds of law firm technologies are most likely to get cloudy, and which should remain firmly on the ground?

Your questions do not have to be mind - bogglers, but do not ask «what kinds of law do you practice?»

Not exact matches

The hearing, set for Tuesday, is the latest development in a showdown between Apple and the U.S. government that has become a lightning rod in the national debate over digital privacy and what kind of data on phones and personal devices should be accessible by law enforcement.

California's proposed privacy law, which will be on the state's November ballot, would guarantee citizens the rights to see what kinds of information large companies are collecting on them, and to prohibit those companies from selling their personal information.

Also, there is no substantial law on who can claim what objects or resources in space, beyond the 1967 Outer Space Treaty that declared space open for most kinds of exploitation, so long as «states» clean up their mess, leaving no contamination or dangerous objects that could harm others.

«The Department of Justice is not going to be extorted... «we're going to do what is required by the rule of law and any kind of threats that anybody makes are not going to affect the way we do our job.»

«We're going to do what's required by the rule of law, and any kind of threats that anybody makes are not going to affect the way we do our job.»

«We're going to do what's required by the rule of law, and any kind of threats that anybody makes are not going to affect the way we do our job,» Rosenstein said.

Most of what a Federal Reserve Board member does is dealing with microeconomic issues having to do with bank regulation, bank mergers, bank supervision, consumer protection laws, CRA [Community Reinvestment Act], fair lending statutes — all kinds of things that have nothing to do with monetary policy.

Therefore, we can't actually say what kind of external agent, if any, would have been necessary for us to wind up with the universe that we have, along with its laws.

Kevin your right personal beliefs and or religion does not belong in law, and I am not saying that what this atheist organization is doing is wrong or anything, I think what there doing is a good thing, I just think this particular message could have been done from a different perspective, this message makes them appear like the self righteous ones, and it might give out the wrong kind of message, instead it should have said something like you believe in god fine, but don't put it in our laws.

Conservatives can not push enough Democrats and wobbly moderates toward greater comfort with originalist - like its - the - only - Constitution - we've - got thinking, can not get them to sacrifice the judicial avenue to what they see as policy goodies, or get them to really censure the kinds of unconstitutional short - cuts Obama is modeling, if they think that folks like you and I believe that Real originalism would ban hours - laws, collective bargaining, etc..

What would you do under that kind of rule of law but escape to a place where you will be left alone?

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

We acknowledged that many people have recognized that these two texts pretty clearly do prohibit at least some kinds of male - male sex... The law really means what pretty much everyone has taken it to mean for centuries.

A feeling of guilt so out of proportion with what my life was, is it inscribed in the nature of every child born into this world (the moral law within us, according to Kant, attests the existence of God), or is it a deformation occurring in infancy, imposed upon the Christians of my kind, and which I have not known how to cure?

They often include provisions about religious practices for the couple and for any children who may arrive; whether or not they plan to have children; what they will do in the case of a pregnancy not wanted by one or the other; what will happen if the couple decides to separate; what the financial arrangements will be in such a case; what provision will be made for the children; how in - laws, relatives, and friends will be included in the relationship; what sexual practices will be followed; under what circumstances the couple will move from one home to another; whose job will take precedence; and what kinds of freedom each partner is to have.

It may be, however, that one reason that «radical and egalitarian individualism» often appears to be «winning out» is that it so thoroughly permeates that part of American law, constitutional law, where we tell the story about what kind of people we think we are.

This means that when he tried to understand what he saw, and give some kind of explanation for the life and movement he witnessed, it did not occur to him to look for an abstract principle or a natural law.

What is more, they can be greatly helped if they see that this is indeed the chief stress in public prayer or church worship, so that such social praying is undertaken by a family of God's children addressing a loving Father (who makes demands upon them, to be sure, but who is no hateful dictator nor absentee ruler nor moral tyrant, but genuinely concerned for their best development as his children), rather than a kind of law - court or imperial audience with a terrifying deity.

So are the miracle wheat and rice of the Green Revolution, the technology of behavior modification proposed by B. F. Skinner, 1 and the computerized model of the global ecology produced by the authors of The Limits to Growth.2 This kind of reasoning operates within the limits of what is possible as defined by (1) the available material and human resources, (2) the laws of nature, and (3) the state of knowledge at the time.

The Bible, therefore, is more interested in particular legislation than with theories of law; it is not content to exhort the reader to be kind and honest in general but is concerned to say specifically what kindness and honesty mean.

But the government can and will make some laws concerning who you can employ, what you can require them to do, and what kind of benefits you can legally offer them.

Nature does establish limits which can not be transgressed: «the laws of Gaia, which regulate what kinds of changes in «nature» are sustainable in the life system of which we are an inextricable part.»

Many peopie carry this kind of psychological burden, unable to express their negative feelings, unable to work them out, finding themselves under the burden of a law that says no matter what your real feelings are you are supposed to honor and love and obey your parents.

Once properly vetted, your money usually buys you first or secondhand access to information most fans (or journalists) would kill for: player run - ins with the law that go unreported, what certain coaches are really like, what kind of power an A.D. or president really has, and most importantly, who really is in charge of your football program.

Current labeling laws, if left unchanged, would better ensure that parents know exactly what kind of flavored milk their children are consuming at school.

There's nothing in the law that says that the materials used in these kind of products need to be listed for the consumer, therefore you can never know for sure what your sanitary pads are really made of and what they might do for your body and health.

depends on what kind of a midwife and your state law.

we don't need laws about what kinds of «treats» are appropriate in schools — and i'm not even a libertarian / conservative!

I'm hardly an expert in US law, but from what I understand there are two kinds of jurisdiction depending on the crime.

«It behooves them to meet at some point in public to kind of outline how they intend to proceed, (and) what parts of their deliberations they feel would not be subject to the open meetings law and need to be conducted confidentially, and to start off on a good public footing,» she said.