I really don't understand
what kind of point Roger Pielke Jr. was trying to make, but it appears to be a subtle attempt to slander coverage of climate change.
Before you go to redeem the miles you earned on a flight, make sure to check
what kind of point value you'll be getting.
We will now try to define
what kind of pointing can we get with two good wheels and thrusters.
Hopefully this will help you determine
what kind of points you want to start collecting in order to reach your goals, whatever they may be.
What kind of points are you starting with?
The award - booking services typically work like this: You tell them how many and
what kinds of points and miles you have, specify when you want to travel and to where, and the booker suggests an itinerary.
No matter
what kind of points rewards program you're interested in, you can find the right credit card here, anytime and from anywhere.
To get the most value out of a card, you often have to understand how to earn points or miles in the most efficient way, know
what kinds of points transfer to which programs and, if you're talking about airlines, comprehend award travel rules and award charts that vary by airline.
Not exact matches
So
what we're trying to do is help now to get the business up and get the numbers right so that he can
kind of get to that
point.»
Some
kind of rebound is possible, the question is: from
what point?
No matter
what kind of business you run, there are likely many
points of contact where you can talk directly to buyers, such as through social - media channels, blogs and live events.
Case in
point: they will remember
what kind of pillow you prefer and make you feel like you just arrived home with their friendly service!
While not all gossip is bad — one can share secrets about wonderful things like a suspected pregnancy or job promotion — Epstein
points out that «useful gossip is, in the minds
of most people, not
what gossip is really about,» and so the majority
of the book focuses on the more naughty
kind of tattling, the
kind that makes your heart beat faster when the subject
of ridicule comes around the corner.
This category
of apps and services use algorithms that automatically predict
what kind of content a user is most likely to be interested in at any
point in time.
The problem
of how much to pay CEOs from this
point of view, and
what combination
of kinds of payment to offer (cash, stock options, etc.), is hotly debated by top business scholars and economists.
We want to give them access to these
kinds of optimization opportunities through the data
points that we've gathered, not just for their shipments but for also
what we're seeing for other people's shipments.»
Included in that is your editorial calendar, which details
what kind of and how much content happens at
what points during the week, month, and quarter.
«The
point is, we intend
what Cordray was doing to have this
kind of autonomy.»
At that
point, it really comes down to personal preference / priorities and
what kind of shaving experience you're looking for.
Zuckerberg was asked by US lawmakers last week
what kind of regulation he would and wouldn't like to see laid upon Internet companies — and he made a
point of arguing for privacy carve outs to avoid falling behind,
of all things, competitors in China.
The first is probably the largest one, which is I'm chairing a group
of the Financial Stability Board that is looking at fintech to see
what kind of issues in the future the regulators and supervisors will face from a financial stability
point of view.
Still,
what if, at one
point between now and the end
of QE tapering, Canadian long - term interest rates were to have the same
kind of knee - jerk reaction seen in the U.S. over the summer?
Danielle DiMartino Booth: I mean if you are asking me if I can possibly assign any
kind of logic or reasoning to
what we are witnessing in a market that has seen a thousand percentage
point appreciation since January 1st, 2017, you're barking up the wrong tree.
Mark Whitmore: This is Mark Whitmore, I keep forgetting we have two Mark's on the line here, and Chris you absolutely interpreted
what I was trying to say correctly, and
kind of to follow up a little bit, I think one
of the things that the other Mark
pointed out is the issue
of timing, and whereas the two prevailing investing paradigms out there seem to be this notion
of efficient market theory which attempts to just buy and hold the market no matter
what, completely price indifferent.
I like real community — and this is
kind of what it looks like — many
of these
points need to exist for people to «grow».
Whats the
point in being born and then dieing in a couple
of years, that
kind of life has no meaning.
I
kind of like
what hippy said about good or evil depends on your
point of view.
Thus we can move away from that
kind of preaching in which our whole time is devoted to telling men
what «rotters» they are, and come to the
point where we can assure them
of the wonder and glory
of God's purpose for them.
As H. H. Rowley
pointed out above, God allows humans to determine
what kind of vessel they will be, and then He uses those who have made themselves vessels
of dishonor.
A precise statement
of what the correspondence or the clash might be is not easy to produce and is not necessary here, since our main purpose in these remarks is merely to emphasize the
point that value experiences depend for their character upon the
kinds of relationships that exist between subject and object.
My real question from a purely «non-believer»
point of view is «
what kind of god would insist that silly rituals like these be observed»?
So while the we are not told here (or anywhere) much about these spiritual beings — we don't have an explanation
of their powers or
of what kind of effects they can have on the believers — Paul's
point is that we don't need to worry, because Christ is far above them.
The most important function
of our analysis up to this
point has been to rid the image
of the wrong
kinds of implications, and to
point up sharply the two
points that the image must convey: the attitude
of tender and solicitous concern on the part
of the shepherd and the relevance
of what he is doing to the need
of the sheep.
This is just the
kind of question that displays much
of what, from a Buddhist
point of view, is wrong with the West.
I don't see the
point to this story, other than it was published on a Sunday... btw
what kind of Christian is Romney?
For
what it is worth, the NRSV is probably the best translation
of the Proverb, «Without prophetic revelations the people perish...» This is the dreams and visions
kind of stuff that Joel 2 and Acts 2
point to as one result
of the Holy Spirit being poured out on all people.
As for failure to show that God exists, as I've asked elsewhere, just
what kind of «evidence» are you looking for, and just how long do you think it is going to be before you begin to contradict yourself, when it is
pointed out to you that your empirical demand for «evidence» will only take you so far when it comes to knowing anything?
the belief on the existence
of the devil was concieved by theologians
of the past thousands
of years, there was no other way
of explaining the bad experiences
of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the
kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part
of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part
of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part
of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality
of the universe ahead
of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part
of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a
point of not believing the practices
of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part
of their learning process.
sure you might
point out that people killed one another throughout history over their beliefs and
what kind of God would want that?
The frequency with which these conditions or circumstances are in place is not to the
point;
what is to the
point is only that there be some such conditions or circumstances, and that they be
of the
kind that (at least logically) may not be in place.
I don't say this to put the man down but to
point out the reality
of what Rush stands for... and his journey is sacred and he is a part
of me as I am a part
of him even as I strive to leave his
kind of thinking behind.
The
point is that when someone says we are like family here, make sure you know
what kind of family they mean.
But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only
of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain
point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known
kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in
what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint
of God as to
what His will is for this self.
In all these cases the crucial
point is obscured: it is in a new
kind of personal relationship, defined by
what man knows
of himself through the action
of God in Jesus Christ that the true work and marks
of the spirit should be sought.
I'm not sure
what my
point is really, I'm
kind of rambling, but I suppose it's just that I'm wondering that if it's possible for a bunch
of online strangers to work out their disagreements and come to a friendly understanding (and yes endure temporary offenses and misunderstandings), it must be possible in real life church IF (a big «if») we are willing to stop being too afraid to speak up.
The NATO essay
points again to the fact that, whether the issue under discussion is welfare policy or foreign policy,
what we consistently find in the work
of Irving Kristol is a consideration
of public life and governing from the standpoint
of the individual soul» and, by the same token, a consideration
of the need to foster the right
kinds of virtues in individual souls in order for the most desirable regimes to be successful.
Then I shall attempt to say — and this is the principal
point of my paper —
what kind of discourse on freedom philosophy can articulate, beyond psychological and political discourse, that will still merit the name
of «discourse» on religious freedom.
But at this
point it is sufficient only to
point out that in the chapter
of I Corinthians 15 itself, Paul actually discusses the nature
of the general resurrection and attempts to answer the question, «With
what kind of body do they come?»
What is this, your 100th try to make some
kind of point with this?
The young daughter
of an acquaintance
of mine spoke to the
point when she told me that at her school there were no requirements
of any
kind and that, as a result, she «got bored stiff with having to do every day
what she wanted to do.»