Sentences with phrase «what kind of points»

No matter what kind of points rewards program you're interested in, you can find the right credit card here, anytime and from anywhere.

What kind of points are you starting with?

Hopefully this will help you determine what kind of points you want to start collecting in order to reach your goals, whatever they may be.

We will now try to define what kind of pointing can we get with two good wheels and thrusters.

Before you go to redeem the miles you earned on a flight, make sure to check what kind of point value you'll be getting.

The award - booking services typically work like this: You tell them how many and what kinds of points and miles you have, specify when you want to travel and to where, and the booker suggests an itinerary.

To get the most value out of a card, you often have to understand how to earn points or miles in the most efficient way, know what kinds of points transfer to which programs and, if you're talking about airlines, comprehend award travel rules and award charts that vary by airline.

I really don't understand what kind of point Roger Pielke Jr. was trying to make, but it appears to be a subtle attempt to slander coverage of climate change.

Not exact matches

So what we're trying to do is help now to get the business up and get the numbers right so that he can kind of get to that point.»

Some kind of rebound is possible, the question is: from what point?

No matter what kind of business you run, there are likely many points of contact where you can talk directly to buyers, such as through social - media channels, blogs and live events.

Case in point: they will remember what kind of pillow you prefer and make you feel like you just arrived home with their friendly service!

While not all gossip is bad — one can share secrets about wonderful things like a suspected pregnancy or job promotion — Epstein points out that «useful gossip is, in the minds of most people, not what gossip is really about,» and so the majority of the book focuses on the more naughty kind of tattling, the kind that makes your heart beat faster when the subject of ridicule comes around the corner.

This category of apps and services use algorithms that automatically predict what kind of content a user is most likely to be interested in at any point in time.

The problem of how much to pay CEOs from this point of view, and what combination of kinds of payment to offer (cash, stock options, etc.), is hotly debated by top business scholars and economists.

We want to give them access to these kinds of optimization opportunities through the data points that we've gathered, not just for their shipments but for also what we're seeing for other people's shipments.»

Included in that is your editorial calendar, which details what kind of and how much content happens at what points during the week, month, and quarter.

«The point is, we intend what Cordray was doing to have this kind of autonomy.»

At that point, it really comes down to personal preference / priorities and what kind of shaving experience you're looking for.

Zuckerberg was asked by US lawmakers last week what kind of regulation he would and wouldn't like to see laid upon Internet companies — and he made a point of arguing for privacy carve outs to avoid falling behind, of all things, competitors in China.

The first is probably the largest one, which is I'm chairing a group of the Financial Stability Board that is looking at fintech to see what kind of issues in the future the regulators and supervisors will face from a financial stability point of view.

Still, what if, at one point between now and the end of QE tapering, Canadian long - term interest rates were to have the same kind of knee - jerk reaction seen in the U.S. over the summer?

Danielle DiMartino Booth: I mean if you are asking me if I can possibly assign any kind of logic or reasoning to what we are witnessing in a market that has seen a thousand percentage point appreciation since January 1st, 2017, you're barking up the wrong tree.

Mark Whitmore: This is Mark Whitmore, I keep forgetting we have two Mark's on the line here, and Chris you absolutely interpreted what I was trying to say correctly, and kind of to follow up a little bit, I think one of the things that the other Mark pointed out is the issue of timing, and whereas the two prevailing investing paradigms out there seem to be this notion of efficient market theory which attempts to just buy and hold the market no matter what, completely price indifferent.

I like real community — and this is kind of what it looks like — many of these points need to exist for people to «grow».

Whats the point in being born and then dieing in a couple of years, that kind of life has no meaning.

I kind of like what hippy said about good or evil depends on your point of view.

Thus we can move away from that kind of preaching in which our whole time is devoted to telling men what «rotters» they are, and come to the point where we can assure them of the wonder and glory of God's purpose for them.

As H. H. Rowley pointed out above, God allows humans to determine what kind of vessel they will be, and then He uses those who have made themselves vessels of dishonor.

A precise statement of what the correspondence or the clash might be is not easy to produce and is not necessary here, since our main purpose in these remarks is merely to emphasize the point that value experiences depend for their character upon the kinds of relationships that exist between subject and object.

My real question from a purely «non-believer» point of view is «what kind of god would insist that silly rituals like these be observed»?

So while the we are not told here (or anywhere) much about these spiritual beings — we don't have an explanation of their powers or of what kind of effects they can have on the believers — Paul's point is that we don't need to worry, because Christ is far above them.

The most important function of our analysis up to this point has been to rid the image of the wrong kinds of implications, and to point up sharply the two points that the image must convey: the attitude of tender and solicitous concern on the part of the shepherd and the relevance of what he is doing to the need of the sheep.

This is just the kind of question that displays much of what, from a Buddhist point of view, is wrong with the West.

I don't see the point to this story, other than it was published on a Sunday... btw what kind of Christian is Romney?

For what it is worth, the NRSV is probably the best translation of the Proverb, «Without prophetic revelations the people perish...» This is the dreams and visions kind of stuff that Joel 2 and Acts 2 point to as one result of the Holy Spirit being poured out on all people.

As for failure to show that God exists, as I've asked elsewhere, just what kind of «evidence» are you looking for, and just how long do you think it is going to be before you begin to contradict yourself, when it is pointed out to you that your empirical demand for «evidence» will only take you so far when it comes to knowing anything?

the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.

sure you might point out that people killed one another throughout history over their beliefs and what kind of God would want that?

The frequency with which these conditions or circumstances are in place is not to the point; what is to the point is only that there be some such conditions or circumstances, and that they be of the kind that (at least logically) may not be in place.

I don't say this to put the man down but to point out the reality of what Rush stands for... and his journey is sacred and he is a part of me as I am a part of him even as I strive to leave his kind of thinking behind.

The point is that when someone says we are like family here, make sure you know what kind of family they mean.

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

In all these cases the crucial point is obscured: it is in a new kind of personal relationship, defined by what man knows of himself through the action of God in Jesus Christ that the true work and marks of the spirit should be sought.

I'm not sure what my point is really, I'm kind of rambling, but I suppose it's just that I'm wondering that if it's possible for a bunch of online strangers to work out their disagreements and come to a friendly understanding (and yes endure temporary offenses and misunderstandings), it must be possible in real life church IF (a big «if») we are willing to stop being too afraid to speak up.

The NATO essay points again to the fact that, whether the issue under discussion is welfare policy or foreign policy, what we consistently find in the work of Irving Kristol is a consideration of public life and governing from the standpoint of the individual soul» and, by the same token, a consideration of the need to foster the right kinds of virtues in individual souls in order for the most desirable regimes to be successful.

Then I shall attempt to say — and this is the principal point of my paper — what kind of discourse on freedom philosophy can articulate, beyond psychological and political discourse, that will still merit the name of «discourse» on religious freedom.

But at this point it is sufficient only to point out that in the chapter of I Corinthians 15 itself, Paul actually discusses the nature of the general resurrection and attempts to answer the question, «With what kind of body do they come?»

What is this, your 100th try to make some kind of point with this?

The young daughter of an acquaintance of mine spoke to the point when she told me that at her school there were no requirements of any kind and that, as a result, she «got bored stiff with having to do every day what she wanted to do.»