What kind of proof is that?
What kind of proof would you ask for exactly?
Once you've received a final quote for your project, there are usually terms listed or provided, such as whether payment is required up front (it usually is for new clients or authors), how long it will take to produce the books from the time you provide the files,
what kind of proofs you'll receive, whether shipping costs are included or additional, and so on.
Not exact matches
I have heard many different theologians debate whether the behemoth was a crocodile or a hippo and some say it refered to a dino
of some
kind, none had any more
proof than conjecturing about
what the ancient hebrew words to describe it really meant.
If you require
proof, then
what kind of «faith» would that be??? You can not disprove these things anymore than they can be proven... at least not the
kind of proof you require....
All the semiological systems, along with the linguistic system, must be decoded, and, as Ricoeur says, «that requires a special affinity between the reader and the
kind of things the text is about» (19)
What is appropriated is not a system
of ideas but deep values
of truth that are imposed «with such power that no further
proof is needed to perceive their validity and reality».
I do respect the way you think, the
proof that I can give you is that when you die you will go to hell, it is not an option, because you don't believe in my God, hope you have a good time there with your own palI, I know that you
kind of people will love to find out for yourselves that
what it was said all along was the true
Even so, the whole tradition
of what is usually called «Christian philosophy,» whose most admirable expression is, doubtless, the imposing system
of Aquinas, is but a series
of attempts to make the identification; and the profound influence
of that tradition, even on those who now declare its God to be dead, is
proof that these attempts have enjoyed some
kind of success.
If you tell me that you fixed yr car, merely watching you drive down the street wd be one
kind of proof, but I might want to look under the hood to see for myself
what you really did.Somebody once said
of C.S.Lewis that.»..
What kind of stupid argument is it to cast aspersions onto the scientific method because YOU can't put up any demonstrable
proof for the philosophy that you claim is more than mere philosophy?
It's
kind of proof writ large that
what you give kids (well, rats, actually) is
what you get from them.
So is actually been based out
of the UK so you
kind of have to use your imagination for everyone here that is in the US because it doesn't apply necessarily to us but actually they sound
proof some maternity and delivery rooms over in the UK and I
kind of want to get your feedback on this, it is an interesting concept for
what they are doing in the UK, it is
kind of a sad story, they are you it at a specific maternity unit.
«
What we're doing is a
proof of concept: that this can be done, and for less than the government would pay for the same
kind of mission,» says Fred Bourgeois, head
of Team Frednet, a Lunar X Prize competitor based in California.
What they are doing is brilliant, breakthrough science, and therefore exactly the kind of high - visibility, proof - of - concept example that will show conservation biologists and the general public what a potent new toolkit biotech is bringing to wildlife conservat
What they are doing is brilliant, breakthrough science, and therefore exactly the
kind of high - visibility,
proof -
of - concept example that will show conservation biologists and the general public
what a potent new toolkit biotech is bringing to wildlife conservat
what a potent new toolkit biotech is bringing to wildlife conservation.
What it is, instead, is a throwback to the
kinds of movies Taylor Hackford likes to make: glossy, edgeless, overheated prestige entertainments that are sometimes, as was the case with his
Proof of Life, more interesting for the publicity drama they create than for the films themselves.
What kind of text
proof will I receive?
Reader Reviews -
What's known in the marketing industry as «social
proof» — some
kind of recommendation from the customer's peers (or betters) telling them that this book or author is a great fit for them.
If we get some evidence, we can then move on to discussing
what kind of standard
of proof we're looking for... but that's then, and this is now.
My
proofs can stand to any scrutiny,
What kind of physicist you are; when you don't understand that: when O&N warm up, they expand?!
So,
what we have here from Bud Ward is little more than half the story, with the basic idea
of trusting Gelbspan as some
kind of highly regarded investigative journalist who found smoking gun
proof that skeptic climate scientists are shills paid by the fossil fuel industry to lie to the public.
I think scientists enjoy and are used to rigorously testing their ideas and the ideas
of others in
what I would consider toe - to - toe, you're - wrong - and - here's - the -
proof,
kind of arguments.
The last point I should touch on by way
of introducing my overly revealing Facebook share (yes, all my friends in Ireland take this
kind of personal sharing as further
proof that I have lived in California too long) is about
what this means to me in terms
of my personal life journey.