Sentences with phrase «what kind of religion»

Studies in the psychology of religion suggest that how one practices religion, or «what kind of religion,» is more significant for the quality of family relationships than how strongly one believes in a religion, or «how much religion.»

No matter what kind of religion or spirituality you follow, chanting is transcendental and a wonderful way to speak positive affirmations to the world.

The question is what kind of religion is available to shape the larger society and what its basic «metaphysical - moral» or «theo - social» convictions are.

What kind of religion would believe that a young woman gets ra.p.ed... that it is somehow a stain on HER, and she then just needs to marry the ra.p.ist and all will be well.

Think about it people - what kind of religion seriously regards an 800 year old heart as a sacred relic?

But what kind of religion are we talking about here?

Not exact matches

with this kind of religion imagine what the believes will believe 2 generations from now

The rest of the world will want to separate you by race, by socioeconomic status, by education levels, by religion, by neighborhood, by what kind of car you drive, by the clothes you wear, by athletic ability.

They let off the Turkish guests in Mumbai when the visitors read some kind of khalima to prove their religion, what a shame.

What kind of bumpkin are you that doesn't even know what a comparative religion classWhat kind of bumpkin are you that doesn't even know what a comparative religion classwhat a comparative religion class is?

Kevin your right personal beliefs and or religion does not belong in law, and I am not saying that what this atheist organization is doing is wrong or anything, I think what there doing is a good thing, I just think this particular message could have been done from a different perspective, this message makes them appear like the self righteous ones, and it might give out the wrong kind of message, instead it should have said something like you believe in god fine, but don't put it in our laws.

Now, before you jump in with the standard BS rhetoric, i want you to know i'm only stating these things because i want you to see what it's like to have your beliefs criticized and so you know that all you're pushin, is another kind of religion.

The Mormon religion is a cross between what JS learned in church, from the Freemasons, and what just seemed kind of cool at the time.

Finally, to make it perfectly clear, what he was getting at is that he (as well as I) believe people don't always turn to religion for the right... or maybe not for the traditionally intended reasons, or if they were already «kind of» religious, they strengthen that religion for the wrong reasons.

I personally think religion should not be a factor.No one should ask the candidates what their religious views are and they should never mention them.Their religious preferences have absolutely no effect on what type of leader they will be.Unless they are some kind of a religious fanatic.I think it's time for an atheist.There was not a Christian president for over the first 50 years of our nations existence.And, I do not think there has been one since.If you look it up you will find not one of our founding fathers were Christian.Not even Jefferson.I know he wrote the Jefferson bible, but, that's just because he, like the other founding fathers, did not believe Jesus to be of divine decent.So, he kept his philosophy while removing all the mystical and dogmatic concepts.

Most wars are religions that fight one another... Pray for Peace??? what the hell kind of church can say that and then say kill gays??? Let us remember there are those in the religious order who molest your children and hide under the sheets so nobody can find them..

Now if we regard all real religions as attempts to get at a special kind of truth to provide some answer to man's intuitions about his own nature, we shall, I believe, find that what we know as «Christianity» comprehends, develops and fulfills all that at heart we hold to be true.

I know lots of Muslims, lots of Jews, lots of Christians, tons of Hindus, and some are kind, some are mean, some like animals, some like sports, some are liberals, some are conservatives, some like to swim, but it has nothing to do with what religion they are.

Although Jesus had some decent ideals (regardless of what kind of being you think he was), history shows us that Christianity, the religion, for as much as it has aided people, has been political, corrupt (well just human to be kinder) right from the git - go, and the cause of enormous evil and suffering throughout its history.

«Whenever... preachers, instead of a lesson in religion, put [their congregation] off with a discourse on the Copernican system, on chemical affinities, on the construction of government, or the characters or conduct of those administering it, it is a breach of contract, depriving their audience of the kind of service for which they are salaried, and giving them, instead of it, what they did not want, or, if wanted, would rather seek from better sources in that particular art of science.»

What bring peace is community support of the kind discussed in this article more than any priestly service and once again the social benefits of religion I think are highly over-rated.

In After Strange Gods he hinted darkly at the kind of oppression his society might lead to: «What is still more important [than homogeneity of culture] is unity of religious background; and reasons of race and religion combine to make any large number of freethinking Jews undesirable.»

This is the kind of fear that the terrorist want us to have, they want us to be afraid of Muslims just because of there religion and they want to use what we do nt know about Muslims to there advantage.

One could argue that one of the fundamental problems which many religions seek to address (although each with a different vocabulary) is articulated in the following questions: What kind of Being could know birth and death, ecstasy and terror, in the same instant?

This kind of religion is less concerned with «What must I do to be saved?»

The LDS still has not taken responsibility for the role that they played in this, and I believe that it shows what kind of «religion» or» religious beliefs» that the LDS church has.

Kind of smart of Rome then to make a state religion with a primary reminder of what Rome will do to you if you disagree with them.

Should they come to power, all other religions as well as other Christian denominations would be disenfranchised, and what kind of liberty would we have then?

I think that this kind of instruction is important and am thankful that I have at least a general knowledge of what my brothers and sisters believe in other religions.

I disagree that Crossan gets some kind of satisfaction by «debunking» religion — I believe Crossan is interested in history and how Jesus fits into what we know now about that time period.

To me that kind of experience — inward, replenishing power to do and to endure what by myself would have been impossible — is at the very center of religion's meaning.

most churches represent the community in which it is found in many respects if the community is multi-disciplinary in it's religions — then multi-disciplinary churches, as well as many other churches of all kinds, can be found there are real differences in the religious atmosphere and realities in the USA compared to the Mid-East the seperation of church and state is taken fairly seriously — and — from what i have seen so far — is a good thing for most

I would like to explore the question, «What kind of philosophy of religion is compatible with Whitehead's cosmology?»

For what has reappeared in strength has not been at all the kind of mainline, liberal and «modern» religion (Christian Century and University of Chicago religion!)

Hello, I mean what «kind» of religions are these.

Granted all that is to be said against the type of religion that is popularly presented in our day, the fact remains that what we need most is more religion of a better kind.

If, in view of all these varied kinds of religion and diverse interpretations of Christianity, you feel bewildered, and wonder just what being a Christian really is, I would call your thoughts home to Christianity's unique Fact, Jesus Christ.

Anyway, since most people think of the first kind when talking about religion, it is easier to say «I'm not religious» than to say, «I am religious, but here is what I mean by that...»

I understood my relationship with nature as a kind of religion and I wanted to see what wisdom I could find from sacred texts.

What kind of pizzy dipsh1t religion causes people to be such bratty babies?!?!? Nuh - uh!

And if, in view of all the varied kinds of religion and diverse interpretations of Christianity, you feel bewildered, and wonder just what being a Christian really is, I would call your thoughts home to Christianity's unique Fact, Jesus Christ.

That is what kind of danger any and all religions pose to humanity.

They add their «Rock» or religion to everything and claim thats what helps the poor and feeds the hungry or houses the homeless, but it's really the other ingredients i.e. the kind hearted people reaching out to help that gives them the facade of helpfulness.

This kind of reasoned, argued, exemplified and Bible - supported moral illumination — not electioneering and lobbying — is what American public life needs from religion.

What kind of branches are «religious fundamentalists and religion haters»?

When one group tries to shove religion down others throats... or morality... or any kind of social behavior, one often resents and is offeneded by what I consider a life of lesser value or meaning.

* shrugs *... I have a suspicion that god / dess / es don't exist, but, I'm kind of fond of the idea of a «one god» in a somewhat weird»em manent / transcendent» way (yah, I know, they don't really go together, but that is kind of what I ses as... miraculous... in my little paradigm) that is not personal, but is intimate (I know, I know, another paradox)... and that most religions are some attempt at people trying to get their head around expressing that «one god»...

What kind of person comes into a «belief blog» and says keep your religion to yourself or stop sticking your religion in my face?

More serious is what Bellamy referred to as its «abusive tone about God and religion,» namely the undeniable atheism and materialism that characterized not all kinds of socialism but particularly the most influential strand, Marxism.

So if anything you should be PROUD to be part of a church and religion that preaches to love and forgive and to be kind regardless of what people do to you.