Sentences with phrase «what kind of teaching»

But what kind of teaching faculty would such a new school need?

They are also clueless about what kind of teaching best motivates this generation to learn... We need more profiles of quality instruction... to inform the education debate.»

Bankhead had a very clear idea about what kind of teaching she wanted to see at her school.

«In [Austin], except for occasional stories told by administrators and teachers, few top officials know what kind of teaching occurs in the district's nearly 6,000 classrooms.

Schwerdt and Wuppermann observe that in recent years, a consensus has emerged among researchers that teacher quality «matters enormously for student performance,» but that relatively few rigorous studies have looked inside the classroom to see what kinds of teaching styles are the most effective.

Relatively few rigorous studies look inside the classroom to see what kinds of teaching styles are the most effective.

The authors added that their motivation for this study was a concern that many school districts are too narrowly focusing on rating teachers based on short - term test gains and they wanted to try to understand what kinds of teaching produce long - term learning benefits.

Not exact matches

The New York City - based «Academy» Urbaniak runs is aimed at teaching women how to communicate in influential and powerful ways, and get more of what they want in all kinds of relationships, from the office boardroom to the bedroom.

So we kind of questioned with all of them — could they be learning more than what they're teaching them?»

I tried all kinds of ways to make money online What works best for me is koocam I teach my hobbies and sell my knowledge in every field It's great

Kind of like a Communist / Socialist professor trying to teach what the US Consitution says ----- I won't even listen.

Plus other people have mentioned bombing mosque's, what kind of example are we teaching are children and future generations??

So I have [this song saying], «You are not possessive, You are not invasive, You are not controlling» All these things that I've kind of been taught that God was, and I no longer believe that God is, so I was trying to chip away at the block of marble and see, like, what is under here?

So I think the idea that the [appeal to] conscience [can be used as a] kind of an escape hatch is really not what the church teaches.

Many don't really care what kind of preaching a pastor does, they only care whether he teaches eternal security or not.

And so the story teaches us something about how to look for such things — if not necessarily to know when we have found them — and to know what kinds of secrets are worth pursuing.

Ephesians 5:21 - 33's teaching on marriage is about changing that view of marriage to one of unity and love — the kind of love that could transform the authority - subordinate nature of first - century Ephesian marriages, into what God desires for marriage in the New Covenant: oneness, companionship and mutuality.

For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).

But frankly, all the pastors ought to be doing in the first place is being a servant and a slave to others — that's what a pastor is anyway, at least what sketchy little bits of «pastor» roles can be made out in the NT, as it's scarcely mentioned — not necessarily standing up there and teaching everyone two or three times a week, running the show, and acting like some kind of CEO.

Evangelical church and in fact all torch bearer of morality should come out and advocate ban on assault weapons and all kinds of violence if they truly believe in what they teach.

I know there are all kinds of ways children need their parents to guide, teach, and set limits on what is appropriate and what's not.

While it is of course true that those who belong to this school are perhaps most vocal in their assertion that in our Lord alone may God be seen at work, and while it is they who denounce the concept of «general» revelation as a vain fancy of sub-Christian speculation, a considerable number of other Christian thinkers take what in effect is the same position when they make central to their teaching a kind of uniqueness in the coming and the person of Christ which effectively removes him from the context of the total sell - expressive operation of the Eternal Word.

What about the examples of this same kind of teaching that are, on occasions, still present in the New Testament?

When I read this, about 15 years ago, I was stunned that God wanted His people to use the tithe to celebrate with our families and to help the less financially «properous» people (instead of judging them) I had such mixed feelings, of freedom and joy in God but also a kind of betrayal from what has been taught, almost to scare us.

I pray he will find a job elsewhere outside of «teaching divinity» where he'll be paid 3 - times his current salary, as I can not imagine what kind of «knowledge» he has to pass on to his students.

There are two kinds of Christians throughout the world: Those that practise what the Rabbi taught,,, and those that make up their own rules...

The question now is what kind of narrative methodology is needed in order to teach organically.

In whatever trials you are facing, ask God these kinds of questions: Say, «Father, what are you trying to teach me in this situation?

You can't pick out what you want... and it deffinetly condems gays, the bible says also, if you don't work you don't eat... and its a shame for someone not to take care of their familys... and yes we are to feed the poor... but the poor need to be taught how to take care of themselves... Your not poor if you have a big screen tv, car, extra jewlery, free cell phone, etc.... So there is no new kind of Christianity...!

Benedict's own later theological conservatism owed less to any kind of ideology, I think, than to his allergic reaction to what he saw as a lack of intellectual robustness and spiritual seriousness in the seminaries where he taught.

With this caveat, and along with it the honest admission that the material in the Gospels is not the kind that permits us (after the fashion of earlier «liberal» Protestantism) to pay Jesus what we might style moral compliments — as if he is indubitably known as in every sense, both in teaching and in behavior, to be ideally perfect — we can go on to consider his humanity, insofar as it can be recovered from the impressions of him found in the New Testament.

The prayer is kind of written in an archaic style, so he even went through the prayer line by line to teach us what the words meant.

If enough people do not care or do not know, that can be construed as a kind of negative consent, but it is not what the American people were taught to call government by the consent of the governed.

«That the Church is or should be some kind of democratic club where we all have a say in what is taught, is patently ridiculous....

One hates to make old arguments, but if this education teaches (as other sections of the report make clear that is must) the familiar doctrines about how very wrong it is to impose any kind of normative standard on the many forms that peoples» desires can take, on what basis does it exclude pornography or the sexualization of young girls as legitimate forms of the varied human sexual appetite?

If you don't get it — a shame, but ultimately what history teaches is new forms of hate come up wrapped in all kinds of denial.

That it offers a plausible explanation of the two features of the teaching is obvious; and yet it falls short of being altogether convincing, chiefly because the manner of much of Jesus» most characteristic teaching is at the opposite pole from what one would expect to be the manner of a prophet giving a kind of desperate counsel for a moment of crisis.

I confronted my daughter and asked her what kind of values these violent games are teaching my grandson and her answer was, «Ma, it's just a game.»

What the gospel, as well as the teaching of all the prophets, rejects is the kind of impatience we find in most social planning.

What kind of an idiot would teach an entire group of people that killing minorities is a good thing?

As one of those identifying factors, the past can speak to us with enormous authority, provided it is conveyed by a method of teaching and a kind of study that make what might have been a dead past into a past experienced in the living present.

What I like about Jesus is how he teaches us a kinder and more just way of walking through this world.

By the way, I wonder what kind of authority he is on Islam and it's teaching.

A scholar - theologian who once taught on a theological faculty and later went to a department of religion in a secular university has written poignantly about his pilgrimage through the kind of identity crises I have just described: one who in college had a kind of neo-fundamentalist faith, went through graduate school, established peer relationships with scholars, and then found himself in a crisis of belief, now speaks about the morality of belief — the importance of being true and honest in what one can actually avow and affirm with integrity.

i don't know what kind of ministry this person is in, but the ministry I attend teaches us that SEX is AWESOME AWESOME AWESOME!!!!!

I hope that he keeps talking; rather tells what kind of nonsense these people really believe; how out of touch with God and the Bible teachings these people are; how out of touch with main stream America they are; Obama will be voted out in Nov and I hope that tons of money is cut from these people's pockets; http://www.parchmentministries.com

This drive to communicate what they both understood to be some kind of ultimate truth in the person and teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, the man who showed forth God in his own person, was central to both their lives.

What kinds of actions would make you feel more welcome, even if the church still believed / taught that gay relationships are sinful?

On the contrary, what makes a Christian university Christian are personnel decisions about the kind of people who teach there.

So teach people that suicide is forgivable, not just because this is true, but because this it tells others what kind of God we serve.