Sentences with phrase «what kind of theories»

If he's a scientist, what kind of theories does he come up with?

What kind of theory is theology?

What kind of theory of human consciousness would a good - natured pig or an inquisitive dolphin arrive at?

Not exact matches

«What kind of man stays up all night to smear a woman with lies and conspiracy theories?»

I have this theory that democracy and capitalism will destroy one another if you give them enough time, and our most regulated industries are ones that are least open to disruption, so healthcare, finance, telecom, and what ends up happening is the incumbents end up writing the rules and you kind of bog down.

Mark Whitmore: This is Mark Whitmore, I keep forgetting we have two Mark's on the line here, and Chris you absolutely interpreted what I was trying to say correctly, and kind of to follow up a little bit, I think one of the things that the other Mark pointed out is the issue of timing, and whereas the two prevailing investing paradigms out there seem to be this notion of efficient market theory which attempts to just buy and hold the market no matter what, completely price indifferent.

I agree with some of what you are saying but ID is not a theory of any kind.

You don't know what theories are in a scientific context, you make an argument equivalent to «people can't take strides greater than ten feet, therefore it's impossible to run a marathon,» and you think that the lack of a full understanding about a particular hypothetical explanation is some kind of demonstration that science is an abject failure.

You have probably been fed all kinds of lies about what the theory says.

These kinds of ugly theories have existed for far too long now and the people who perpetuate such ideas need to be called out and and seen for what they are; ignorant racists and hate - mongers.

There are numerous other theories about where the skin came from and what kind of skin it was.

The arguments against evolution have been so explicitly and thoroughly expounded in the Catholic theology of the last eighty years, that it is not to be expected that later on they will become even more evident, in relation to the Church's awareness of what she believes, than they are now, and so become capable of providing new and certain grounds for rejecting the theory of evolution of a kind that have been declared to be not yet at present available.

In fact, the process is a good deal more deductive — the vast majority of working scientists begin by assuming scientific realism, then asking what underlying, noumenal features of the world might lead to the kind of evidence that we observe, then building a theory concerning what other kinds of evidence these noumena might produce, then seeking confirmatory and disconfirmatory evidence.

The classic example is the insertion of the «Epochal Theory of Time» in Science and the Modern World, forcing the eventual transformation of what, in that book, had initially been a Spinozistic approach to creativity as the one, undifferentiated underlying activity (with «events» of varied temporal duration as the «modes» of this underlying process) toward the Leibnizian monadology of actual entities (each a kind of time - quantum) that finally appeared subsequently in Process and Reality.

What we need to complement highly abstract evolutionary theories are concrete historical comparisons from which to gain a sense of the kind of environmental factors — as well as the kinds of internal institutional responses — that may result in religious restructuring.

One of the theories hints to what could have brought about billions of years worth of geology and all kinds of life on earth never recorded in the Bible specifically.

RS: What I have got out of it, put very simply, is that Whitehead's criticism of the existing scientific view is not that it is pragmatic, or empirical, or based on sense - data, but that it is based on a kind of theory about the nature of the world, and that this has imparted a view of time and space and how the mind works.

The Bible, therefore, is more interested in particular legislation than with theories of law; it is not content to exhort the reader to be kind and honest in general but is concerned to say specifically what kindness and honesty mean.

This is what I mean by «neo-classical metaphysics,» analogously to what is or may be neo-classical physics — if and when physicists find out how to unite relativity and quantum physics in a unitary theory, and how to relate the many kinds of particles and waves (or strings) and the four (or three) forces.

Kind of like the «what books are you reading» post from a few months back — which I printed out and am slowly and luxuriously making my way through, on the theory that people who read and appreciate your recipes, like me, probably also read books I'd like!

Sunder, many criticisms are unfairly made of Fabian thinkers, but I'd say that a jusftified current one is the tendency to invent variants of a kind of micro-cultural theory to describe what are in and indepdenendent and material reality detailed policy positions.

Third, although there are versions of political realism associated with agonism and with post-Marxist critical theory, realist approaches share a reluctance to commit to any prior account of what makes politics necessary and what kinds of goods or values it can realise.

That kind of predictive capability would demand what seems an unobtainable wish — a comprehensive, bottom - up theory of why markets move as they do.

The kinds of equations that they have now are the kinds of equations you would get in an approximation scheme to some underlying theory, but nobody knows what the underlying theory is.

Their mathematical theory on vaccine scares predicted what kind of early warning signals they should observe in the data.

It is indeed a vindication of sorts for Einstein because much of what today's string theorists do in practice is play with unified theories of the kinds that Einstein and his few colleagues invented.

Aiming to answer the question of what kind of formal theory is needed to model the cognitive representation of a joke, researchers suggest that a quantum theory approach might be a contender.

If the group's theory is correct, Fermi's results «really should be distinct from what people were expecting for other kinds of dark matter,» Finkbeiner says.

So he gets these exotic plants — and in some cases nobody has seen the pollinator — but he is able to predict what the pollinator is like just by looking at the structure of the plant; and this, in a way, is kind of [an] independent test of his theory and a very amusing one and is one that will also get him a lot of pleasure.

And supersymmetry is something you expect in a variety of versions of string theory, so that if we discover supersymmetry that will give us some kind of clue about super string theory, but what that clue is I can't imagine.

Spedding's colleague Joachim Huyssen at the North - West University in South Africa designed an airplane on aerodynamic first principles — what kind of plane would, in theory, fly best.

«In that sense this fits nicely with those kinds of theories about what makes humans special.»

Peter, I think people hear all kinds of seemingly reasonable and consistent theories about what to do about almost anything, but what is most convincing is what advocates actually do.

Dr. Justin Marchegiani: Right, and if you look at kind of Darwin's theory of the survival of the fittest, really what he's saying there in that theory is whoever can adapt the quickest and the fastest will be the most successful.

I like to listen to both sides of an argument, look at the facts (not theories) from both sides and especially look at our evolutionary history to see what kinds of foods people all over the world have eaten for thousands, and hundreds of thousands, of years that sustain optimal health.

The life - altering experience of going to war often focuses the romantic mind... When you are reminded of your own mortality, the theory kind of boils down to, you remember what's most important to you, which is relationships.

Co-written by Rauch — best known as Bernadette on The Big Bang Theory, but also an alumnus of the Upright Citizens Brigade — and her husband, Winston Rauch, The Bronze has a solid premise but it simply can't decide what kind of movie it wants to be.

Another theory is that it's some version of terraforming, created by an unseen alien race to make the earth more habitable ahead of an invasion, but what kind of race is really big on nightmare death bears?

It's a theory that was developed to document the fact that human beings have very different kinds of intellectual strengths and that these strengths are very, very important in how kids learn and how people represent things in their minds, and then how people use them in order to show what it is that they've understood.

«Our chapter in the book focuses on the influence of critical perspectives, Critical Race Theory specifically, and how it encouraged us to ask different kinds of questions that helped us think about what the NIU College of Education does that is successful as well as what we can enhance,» he adds.

I talk to veteran game designer Jason Vandenberghe, who has turned to psychology and personality theory to understand and empathize with what kinds of experiences gamers want.

Over the following years, these included presentations by artists such as Matthew Barney and Elizabeth Peyton, as well as curators like Catherine David and Okwui Enwezor, giving informal takes on practice and theory and the goings - on in the contemporary art scene: what Eccles calls ««what's - on - your - mind» kind of talks.»

This is exactly what Climate Change looks like as it's IMPACTS are happening in the real world (versus in the scientific theory papers)-- all kind sof unexpected unplanned for extreme events and a built infrastructure and building not up to the extreme demands of topdays extreme weather events across an entire Continent.

The hockey stick is one attempt at doing so because it provides a very visual impression of what is happening, but this in turn means a lot of people get the false impression that it is some kind of cornerstone that the whole of global warming theory is built on.

These kinds of claims make for great quotes and conspiracy theories, but when you compare them to what's already actually happening in the world, they fall apart fast.

And to confirm that the CO2 hypothesis is real science and not just ideology, what kinds of observations and measurements disprove the theory?

For my critics who steadfastly believe I'm on some kind of hidden payroll, what happens if you quadruple - down on your efforts to dig this up, but still can't find any evidence to erase what still looks like paranoid conspiracy theory on your part?]

What is the thing that I really dislike is bringing all kind of new untested theories and approaches to the climate discussion and using them as an argument, when the ideas themselves lack all real evidence to support them.

And you don't seem to give a wit about what kind of control the government will force upon you, or what freedoms you will give up for an unproven scientific theory.

That is not to say that there is any merit in «truther» conspiracy theories, but that a massive, painful event, to which most people in the City would likely have some kind of personal connection, is going to skew any statistical test of what and how people to think — the very ground that reason existed on had been destroyed, just a few years earlier.