I am not sure in all this quite
what label people are pinning on our boy Sanchez.
On track at half way point to 30 goals in a season — frankly don't care
what label people need to pin on him.
Not exact matches
They also impact everything from FDA food
labels (think «Nutrition Facts») to public school lunch programs, recommendations at the doctor's office, and
what people are fed from the Defense Department and Veteran's Affairs food programs to government assistance like SNAP and WIC.
«
What people tend to try first, if this is an ongoing problem, is that they
label their food,» Alison Green, author of the «Ask a Manager» blog, told CNBC.
«
What other
people label or might try to call failure, I have learned is just God's way of pointing you in a new direction» - Oprah Winfrey
I think that, plus the amount
people care, and the amount of empathy they have for customers, and how open we are with information — I think all of that combined is
what we might
label as a «startup culture.»
«
What people tend to try first, if this is an ongoing problem, is that they
label their food,» said Green — but that rarely works.
What you are creating is a conglomerate of multiple
people labeled as «potential customer.»
Most
people get locked up in a padded room for less than
what passes as «ok» when it gets the «god»
label attached.
what people do not understand from the natural world, they
label it supernatural.
This might be hard to understand for an American Christian but
what it takes for someone to battle an entire western nation (in a right or wrong way) in the way that Osama did, must be for fame or for money or financial gain (like the US would), after seeing it wasn't about money they
label such a
person who kills innocent
people insane.
I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other religious
people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about
what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as with those who
label themselves as athiest...
What you are
labeling groupthink here is a number of
people who recognize the thoughts / feelings that come from someone who has been severely abused.
It took me a long time to reconcile
what I was — a strong - willed woman who wasn't going to take crap from
people who judge me because of my sex — with the
label of «feminist.»
What I don't get is, being critical of Zionistic policies, agenda or
people is quickly
labeled as «anti-semitic» and is even considered illegal in countries like Germany, yet a bigoted
person like Geert Wilders (who has not once consulted any expect or scholar on Islam) can make a video which literally embodies everything that hate, racism, and ignorance is about, and yet get away with it where the court recognizes it as «denigrating» but not «illegal»!?
The question is
what label to use for such a
person.
People use
labels like «communism» or «Marxism» to throw fear into the mix so they can KEEP their selfish mitts on
what they believe to be their own!
Only I - Thou sees this wholeness as the whole
person in unreasoned relation with
what is over against him rather than as a sum of parts, some of which are
labeled objective and hence oriented around the thing known and some subjective and hence oriented around the knower.
What I meant was that
people who
label everything good and bad, tend to avoid «bad» things like anger and sadness and fear so that instead of dealing with those emotions, they just pretend they aren't there — even though they still are.
BARBARIC??? Before we
label «Barbaric» other countries system we should see how «Barbaric» is for the US, corporate and financial system NOT to give a damn about the real American working
people who support [by being enslaved and blackmailed] the wealth of those who, instead, destroyed the economy and
what was hardly achieved in 60 years!
It always amazes me how many
people will get so worked up about any «non-believer», which is
what I tend to
label myself as, simply saying that he «thinks that God and the Devil aren't real.»
People shouldn't have to fit into little boxes with assigned
labels, that's
what separates humanity today.
That's why
people tack
labels onto Historical fig - ures, like calling Washington a «Born Again Christian» as Limbaugh does, in order to misrepresent those
peoples views as supporting
what the
people of today think.
Your beliefs would lead you to think that I would imagine since the rest of us faith
people are lower than you intellectually (this is
what you can
label as sarcasm).
Had he actually taken the time to find out
what that means to the
people who invoke that
label on themselves he might have save the world a little dumbing down.
I think «
labels» are just a short - hand way of telling
people what you believe or
what you have concluded, with regard to a particular subject.
@
What the Jews don't get:
what anti-Semites don't get is that it's irrational to dislike an entire set of
people based on a common
label given to those
people.
But when we see the
people on the other side of the debate as the enemy (by calling them names,
labeling them or demeaning their convictions), we miss the point of
what «fighting for our faith» is supposed to be about in the first place.
For me this phrase just means that we should value, respect, cherish and love each human inherently because they are fellow human beings regardless of any
labels we wish to put on them and that it is helpful and constructive to distinguish
people's «mark - missing» behaviour from their inherent value as a human being i.e. «I think
what Donald Trump said about banning all Muslims from the United States of America is stupid» and NOT «Donald Trump is stupid».
I did not get the reference about Republicans, this dude is
labeling people,
what a hypocrite.
Richie P «I'm a «religious»
person myself (I put it in quotations because I don't think of myself that way, but that is
what ninety - odd percent of
people would
label me) and I hear stories like this all the time.
I'm a «religious»
person myself (I put it in quotations because I don't think of myself that way, but that is
what ninety - odd percent of
people would
label me) and I hear stories like this all the time.
D.C. Talk's «Jesus Freak» seeks to express the fear that an adolescent believer harbors about being
labeled or ostracized on account of his or her faith: «
What will
people do if they hear that I'm a «Jesus freak»?»
Haha love it — I can affirm
what you say about in choosing not to go with a
label you will definitely frustrate
people.
This problem of change in
persons is looked at again in the next chapter, using the convenient
labels of bliks and onlooks as a basis for seeing
what education can do as initiation.
Unfortunately, «Christian» has become a term that carries a lot of pretentiousness, so it seems to me that we might need to do a bit triage by shelving the
label «Christian» if it helps us figure out
what it means to be human, which may help reinvigorate the term as
people see Christ in our human engagements rather than our church attendance.
Greg Jones» first section, «Learning to Describe Actions,
Persons, and the World: Social Contexts and Moral Judgments,» helps us understand
what (and how very much) is at stake in this and other disputes over descriptive
labels.
you say» But when it comes to
what I am in the world and
what I am doing, then I reject the
label in favor of unity with all
people.»
Obviously everyone needs to make their own decisions about how they eat and why, but I don't think it could hurt for
people to be a bit more knowledgeable about
what these
labels actually mean and respect the
people choosing / having to eat by them.
What I am saying is that a lot of
people who are intolerant to gluten or have Celiacs think that any thing
labeled gluten - free is automatically healthy.
If I thought the
label vegan was stigmatizing, never mind
what people think when you tell them you are eating raw food!
Now, I don't usually like
labeling foods good and bad and of course
what's good for one
person could be so not good for another — dark chocolate (or raw cacao, it's main ingredient) is considered a superfood, but it's not a superfood for you if you're allergic.
On the subject of efforts made to optimise and adapt packaging to emphasise healthier products Andy added, «yes we have looked at portion control,
labelling, highlighting calories and it does make a difference to
what people choose.»
There are many
people who would love to begin drinking wine by using their dinner nightly, but know so little about
what kinds they will enjoy and the way to read a wine
label they never wind up being in a position to pick this up.
There is very little evidence of how traffic light
labels affect
what people actually buy.
And I'd be remiss if I didn't talk a little about
labeling, since that's
what draws
people to a product on a store shelf.
The only adverse point in your story was the slighting of Gordie Howe as a player and
person by
labeling him as one who has achieved
what he has through shading the rules.
I do not agree at all with his tactics (that didn't stopped
people labeling me an AKB» er for which I could care less for it is exactly the Trump syndrome) and with his lack of rotation and adaptation to the modern football (result driven) but I admire him for not giving up an inch from
what he believes football is.
Since we love
labelling who is a striker and who isn't just to be able to shovel shit however we see fit, Sanchez ain't a striker, neither is Walcott etc blah, blah — Real Madrid, UCL champions, have one striker, KB, (or
what people on here would call a striker if I am hearing correctly) in their match day squad.
What i hate about the English
people is that you all tend to hype youngsters way to fast up, award them then with expensive contracts way to soon, and if times are tough you
label them as useless and shet.