Sentences with phrase «what legal interest»

Not exact matches

For what it's worth, I think the strategy would also likely be ineffective: Suppose, notwithstanding our legal mandate, the Federal Reserve were to raise interest rates for the purpose of making it more expensive for the government to borrow.

A member of Trump's legal team called Tuesday for the appointment of a second special counsel to investigate what he says are conflicts of interest within the Department of Justice and the FBI.

A member of President Donald Trump's legal team called Tuesday for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate what he says are conflicts of interest within the Department of Justice and the FBI.

It will surely be interesting to see what legal blunders Banks and his fellow guest speakers will discuss next year after another season of the show airs — and which neighboring tech companies could use their advice.

By paying interest on excess reserves (IOER), the Fed rewards banks for keeping balances beyond what they need to meet their legal requirements; and by making overnight reverse repurchase agreements (ON - RRP) with various GSEs and money - market funds, it gets those institutions to lend funds to it.

What the correct legal status now is of Judge Vaughn Walker's bizarre district court ruling is an interesting question.

«Natural rights mean simply interests which we think ought to be secured,» but it is clear that legal institutions increasingly had the task not only of securing those rights but of defining them as well.30 Laws, that is to say, not only would inform citizens what to do and what not to do but would have to serve as well to assess the morality of what they did.

In this essay, I have referred only to the book of Genesis and thus have chosen not to mention the prohibitions against homosexuality included in Leviticus, for it seems to me that what is at stake now is not homosexuality, which is a fact, a reality, whatever my view of it as a rabbi might be, but the risk of irreversibly scrambling genealogies, questions of legal and social status (the child - as - subject becoming child - as - object), and identities — a confusion that would be harmful to society as a whole and that would lose sight of the general interest in seeking the advantage of a tiny minority.

What is at stake is the risk of irreversibly scrambling genealogies, as well as legal and social statuses (the child - as - subject becoming child - as - object) and identities — a confusion that would be harmful to society as a whole and that would lose sight of the general interest in seeking the advantage of a tiny minority.

An Idaho court might award joint physical custody, joint legal custody or both based on what the court believes is in the best interests of the child.

No need to explain to the client why you think that what they're asking is unethical, no need to consider their interests in the matter, no need to suggest a legal and ethical alternative.

However, I would maintain that this legal bias should not be confused with what is truly in the best interests of their child's or children's development.

the definition seems pretty clear (for fuzzy versions of «clear»), but what I was mostly interested in was how legal it is.

Now, the sentencings of Silver and Skelos will put pressure on lawmakers to react legislatively, Johnston said, and there are measures that can help, from tightening conflict - of - interest laws to some campaign finance changes to limit what he calls some of the «legal corruption» of money influencing the outcome of policy decisions.

An interesting legal question would be what happens when two circuit courts contradict each other (in which case SCOTUS is where that'd be supposed to be resolved).

Dratel noted that outside law firm income is legal in New York, funding things such as cancer research is not a crime, and legislating on issues campaign donors are interested in — a small step removed from what Silver allegedly did — is standard operating procedure.

What's interesting about Spectre is that after 45 years of legal wranglings James Bond finally gets to face his arch nemesis.

Beginning, intriguingly, in 1949 with a young Castro (Victor Huggo Martin) as a clean - shaven lawyer incensed by certain acts of vandalism perpetrated by the American Navy in Havana, the film promises to draw an interesting connection to Gandhi's legal background and, most fascinatingly, the starkly different ways these two revolutionary leaders conduct their rebellions (and to what eventual purposes).

I was interested in the refugees» lives and the dynamics of the communities welcoming them far more than the legal aspects of what was happening.

In states that do have a legal definition it is usually defined as whether a «reasonable person» would think that an official has what appears to be a conflict of interest and therefore has a responsibility to take action to eliminate that appearance.

Fact # 2: Connecticut does not have a legal definition of what would be considered the «appearance of a conflict of interest.»

If a student or his or her parent notifies the administration of the decision to transition during the school year, convene a meeting with the student and parents (if they are involved in the process) to discuss their preferences and any concerns to help find solutions that are in the best interest of the entire school community; develop a timeline for the transition in order to create conditions for a safe and supporting environment at the school; provide appropriate information and training for any educators that interact directly with the student on the transition plan, timelines for transition, and any relevant legal requirements; and develop a communications plan that outlines who needs to know what information, when, and how it will be communicated.

A final major benefit of traditional publishing, and what I believe to be the most important, is the fact that, with a publisher, a writer has a team of experts in every aspect of book production — i.e., editing, copy editing, legal review, when necessary, cover design, formatting, marketing, and publicity — who work together with a common, vested interest in making a book the best representation of the author and the publishing house that it can be.

A couple of years ago I wrote an article asking, pleading really, for any debt settlement company (DSC) to explain to me how they could ever possibly «do whatever is in the best interests of the consumer» when they are unable to give any legal advice in what are inherently legal matters.

What's so wrong with taking a measurable loss up front as compared to allowing a loan to go into foreclosure, which can take months to years, having homeowners file bankruptcy or other legal remedies, which may take more months or years to clear, and accruing thousands of dollars in lost interest and legal fees?

The bank can charge late fees, raise your interest rate, or take legal action to collect what's owed.

I have worked in almost all areas of the securities markets, and if you can't tell me the legal form of what you are doing, I have no interest, particularly not for my clients.»

If you websearch «family loan», you will find several legal firms that specialize in setting these up so they'll pass muster with the IRS and — if disaster occurs and it becomes necessary — be legally enforcable, The one I used had some good resources explaining what the trade - offs were, and suggesting that — as @Jay suggests — the best solution is to charge something close to the IRS's minimum rate, then gift the payments (or the interest) until the loan can be paid back.

Figure out what debt needs to be addressed first according to the interest rates, any potential defaults or legal action which is threatened etc..

Your best option is to find out what legal remedies are available (that's not a topic for this site) and have a very frank conversation with this person who is supposed to be working for you, but doesn't seem to be looking out for your best interests.

But «a Personal Capital adviser, a fiduciary, has the legal obligation to do what's in the client's best interest and does not take back - end fees or anything else.»

But what is one to make of a climate - change law that withstands a $ 35 million campaign supported by conservative oil interests only to be thrown off course by a legal challenge from the leftier edges of the environmental movement, particularly its environmental justice wing?

What kinds of concerns interest you: legal, political, economic, ethical, metaphysical?

Potential providers don't have long to get detailed plans for their legal education and co-op programs to the LSUC — proposals must be filed by the end of May — so it will be interesting to see what comes of this process.

To be clear, I'm interested in understanding the legal truth - what would likely happen in a dispute that went to court, where a judgement would have to be based on the actual wording in the license - not what the goal of the GPL is, the meaning of software freedom, what's morally correct, etc..

Your bio should also tell potential followers about you, a few topics you are very interested in (legal and non-legal) and what practice areas you are engaged in.

What started as a «blog carnival» for everyone interested in law has grown into a community that comes together every week to review recent legal news, opinions, and commentary from an increasing number of remarkable law blogs.

«As lawyers in Ontario, we need to be concerned with what is legal work,» he says, and whether the public interest is being served by who is performing it.

While it is reasonable to question why the head of the USPTO should be allowed to appoint these judges (there's a potential conflict of interest), pulling eight years of rulings into question would present a legal nightmare over what, honestly, seems like a minor procedural issue.

It is a place to publish legal analysis and commentary and have what you publish both be shared directly with others who are interested in the topic and be connected to the actual legal materials you discuss, so that when others read that case, they will also see your commentary connected to that case.

Putting money aside, what makes this platform interesting is that unlike other blockchain projects that seek to enter the legal world of contracting, they have not sought to be «lawyerless», but rather have tried to integrate lawyers into the platform.

What's interesting, we found, was that every chapter, as you can see in the contents page, has become a legal tech startup or domain today.

No matter what legal technology topics you're interested in, you're sure to find a session that fits your needs at Techshow.

What should be of particular interest to the American legal profession is the creation in the U.K. of a distinct self - regulated profession of Legal Cost Managelegal profession is the creation in the U.K. of a distinct self - regulated profession of Legal Cost ManageLegal Cost Management.

The attorneys at Hart Legal help you make the decisions to protect your legal rights and advise on what may be in the family's and child's best inteLegal help you make the decisions to protect your legal rights and advise on what may be in the family's and child's best intelegal rights and advise on what may be in the family's and child's best interest.

At its most straightforward, the third - party funder will finance the legal fees and expenses involved in pursuing the claim on a non-recourse basis, in exchange for what is essentially an equity interest in the claim.

No matter what legal matter you are facing, you need an attorney who is fully invested in your case and who will fight tirelessly in your best interests.

Until landowners are prevented from signing away their land for a generation or more without a requirement they receive independent legal advice, until the legislation and regulation is made transparent to average voters (for example, until they understand why much of what they actually want to appeal may not be appealed so that, from their perspective, they in fact have no right of appeal), until they understand why of all structures it is only the power to approve the erection of wind towers that has been taken away from local municipalities, until they understand why applications for immediately adjacent areas (by gilead and wpd) abutting Lake Ontario in either the most dense or second-most dense bird migration area in all of Eastern Canada may not be joined into one proceeding [guess whose interests that favours]... the list of «untils» is a long one and there is no indication of any change on the way.

What I plan to do in these periodical contributions to Slaw is to examine debates and committee proceedings on bills that may be of special interest to lawyers and legal scholars.

On several occasions the Court has affirmed that the only relevant criterion to determine what idem is, is the identity of the material acts, rejecting the criteria based on the legal qualification of the acts or the legal interests protected.