Isn't
that what military spending is supposed to be for?
Not exact matches
«We will
spend what we need to rebuild our
military,» he said.
Trump typically was short on details of precisely
what he has in mind, particularly how much more in federal treasure he is prepared to
spend to destroy terrorists overseas and at home and to transform
what many already consider the most powerful
military machine on earth to an even stronger, more Trumpian - like defense force.
Trump's budget also calls for
what the President deemed a «historic» increase in
military spending, amounting to an additional $ 52 billion allocation for the Department of Defense.
So, the trend is clearly higher and this trajectory is likely to proceed going forward due to increased
military spending regardless of
what happens on the Korean Peninsula.
Believe it or not, the government's annual payments on interest alone, made even more burdensome by rising rates, are expected to exceed
what it
spends on the
military by 2023.
The NUCLEAR «stick» is the Big Deterrence and thousand of «mini drones» can be used to «secure and hold» an area while our people stay home and run the show for about 1 % of
what we
spend on a useless «
Military Presence».
Obviously we don't need full scale wars to get the target... but if paying for a tank you can't afford is
what you want then lets keep buying tanks... Bush was able to double our debt in his 8 years primarily due to crazy
military spending, and Obama isn't doing very well either.
Yet the Congressional
Military Industrial Complex a cadre of congress people who chair and sit on committees that authorize military spending have bankrupted the nation and in the wake of 9 - 11 created a host of liberty robbing laws that are the anti-thesis to what our founders
Military Industrial Complex a cadre of congress people who chair and sit on committees that authorize
military spending have bankrupted the nation and in the wake of 9 - 11 created a host of liberty robbing laws that are the anti-thesis to what our founders
military spending have bankrupted the nation and in the wake of 9 - 11 created a host of liberty robbing laws that are the anti-thesis to
what our founders wanted.
What it never reveals is that total
military spending is actually many times larger than the official appropriation for the Defense Department.
Biggest Idea: Shane Claiborne with «Give to Uncle Sam
What is Uncle Sam's» «Imagine what would happen if a massive popular movement of ordinary Americans decided to voice their concern about military spending — by withholding $ 10.40 from their 1040 tax forms this y
What is Uncle Sam's» «Imagine
what would happen if a massive popular movement of ordinary Americans decided to voice their concern about military spending — by withholding $ 10.40 from their 1040 tax forms this y
what would happen if a massive popular movement of ordinary Americans decided to voice their concern about
military spending — by withholding $ 10.40 from their 1040 tax forms this year?
And let's face it, given
what we
spend on the
military and the intelligence agencies, aren't you as well just more than a little disappointed that the government STILL can't find a guy riding from cave to cave on a donkey?
that's exactly
what republicans are saying and wil continue to say because of
military spending in their districts and kick backs from foreign governments who don't have to cover thecost of their own security needs.
What would it mean to proclaim the ways of Jesus to a government that only speaks the language of
military spending and protecting its own interests?
What explains the
spending of half a trillion dollars on a
military campaign that was avoidable in the first place and has in the end ripped apart Afghanistan's intricate ethno - political fabric?
Perhaps best known for advocating that the nation guard against the potential influence of the
military — industrial complex, a term he is credited with coining, the speech also expressed concerns about planning for the future and the dangers of massive
spending, especially deficit
spending, the prospect of the domination of science through Federal funding and, conversely, the domination of science - based public policy by
what he called a «scientific - technological elite».
But
what was in fact indirectly responsible was the massive
military spending over decades on the USSR side, crippling the economy.
Just
what sort of role is there for an organisation that aimed to win wars, when the US defence department
spends more than the entire GDP of many countries on
military contracting?
I'm not sure
what it is about the shade — perhaps it is the years I actually
spent wearing camo and hunting with my dad, maybe it is the relatives who have served in the
military, perhaps it's just a color I like.
And here's a guy who's just played a
military man in his next movie, and has come off an award season playing a sociopath in Nocturnal Animals, and has also played a superhero, and he
spends most of his time talking about gardening, and cooking for his children, and doing the grocery shopping, and when discussing his marriage, here's how he describes
what he gets out of it:
We have exceptional health care and national security because we constantly invest in change — above and beyond
what we
spend to merely operate our
military and health - care systems.
If children's learning were to receive «the
military solution,» namely funding equal to more than a third of
what the world's nations
spend on education, American schools could improve enough to be among the world's best institutions.
What gets
spent on the
military budget ends up trickling down and creating a massive economy, unless of course you think computers and the internet and GPS and satellite tv etc were wholly developed by well intentioned hairshirt businesses.
But I'm going to do it all over again — because I was just reminded of this: China
spends 1 / 6th the amount the United States does on its
military, and
spends twice
what the US does on funding clean energy.
Whether you've been in for only a few years, or you've
spent your entire career within the
military, when it's time to become a civilian again and find a regular 9 - 5, how do you know
what skills and experience can earn you an interview?
Moreover, because vets
spent their latest years in the
military service, veterans» most recent experience may not meet
what prospective employers look for in a potential job candidate.