Sentences with phrase «what modellers»

That is I am afraid what these modellers have done.

Not exact matches

We economists and credit risk modellers speak euphemistically of idiosyncratic shocks, but this is what we mean.
What has confounded modellers is that every time the 1991 El Nino has appeared to have run its course, it has revived.
Colin Johnson, an atmospheric chemistry modeller at the Met Office Hadley Centre in Exeter, translates what is happening in the atmosphere into algorithms that form the basis of climate models.
«If we assume an optimistic scenario for greenhouse gas emissions — the RCP 2.6 scenario, [see Fact Box] which would result in a warming of about two degrees Celsius — then we can expect an increase in sea level similar to what we see in this video,» says climate modeller Martin Stendel from the Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen.
So what we have in the climate change area (and what I find fascinating for cynical reasons) is that everyone and their grandmother, whether they be lawyers, anthropologists, economists, semi-retired mineral engineers, poets, old academic codgers, weigh in on this scientific issue often with more aplomb and fanfare than the actual scientists (earth obs through modellers) themselves.
What you are not being told is that these «tunings», «adjustments», «calibrations» and «tinkerings» are being used to cover up failings in the models, or «biases» as the modellers like to describe them.
It is therefore incumbent on the modellers to try and produce diagnostics that are commensurate with what the observations actually represent.
It is a very interesting thought experiment to ask what the plight of climate modellers would be if industrial civilization had arisen earlier, somewhat after the Last Glacial Maximum when D - O events were common and maybe even the Younger Dryas was looming.
This validation is what most climate modellers spend almost all their time doing.
What of Humlum and Akasofu (flavours - various of Geologist) or Scarfetta (astrophysics modeller and not of this world)?
Alternatively we could what for the science and the modellers to get a clearer picture and then act.
Modellers download the database sets to initialise their models, which jump - starts what would otherwise be a very lengthy process - one that each modelling team would have to attempt, thus duplicating effort.
I defer to the climate modellers on the question of what levels of temperature rise to be concerned about and how to do the modelling.
But as energy, momentum and mass must be conserved, the modeller must take an arbitrary decision what to do with this excess or deficit.
Judith, as you obviously know NS and fluid dynamics well and in any case better than most modellers, I would like to have your take on what seems to me really the basic problem of the models.
This is what the climate modellers are doing.
What's priceless is the bastard nuclearists who are behind this AGW hoax (in France, all climate modellers and most of French authors at the IPCC are in laboratories affiliated with our state agency Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique) are aimed at now by greenies, but with that same hoax.
I suggest this is what influenced the modellers because Wigley was working with them as Director of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at East Anglia.
But what do climate modellers care for such real - world scientific laws?
Clearly, the model data being the «opinion» of the modellers reflects precisely their ignorant opinion and not what is actually reflected by the empirical measurements.
Moreover, the availability of the output from climate models and the advisability of using climate model results at particular scales, from the point of view of the climate modellers, ultimately determines what scales can and should be used.
I think that many climate modellers are similar to astrologers — they both use pseudo-scientific mumbo - jumbo to produce their forecasts, which tell their customers what they want to hear.
Using what we know of a successful effort to parameterize an intractable problem, doesn't the historical approach made by the modellers indicate that DrK could restate their probable failure with more certainty?
I'm not a climate modeller but with a bit of literature search I could find out what kind of subgrid models they use for the ocean and atmosphere.
Before we get too bogged down in theological problems such as calculating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin (or climate modellers on an ice floe) perhaps we should look at what the data actually show.
«There is this mismatch between what the climate models are producing and what the observations are showing,» says lead author John Fyfe, a climate modeller at the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis in Victoria, British Columbia.
What the climate modellers are trying to do is model the effect of a sustained and long lasting increase in the CO2 level above the ocean's and biosphere's natural ability to absorb it.
This should, in theory, lead to more realistic projections for the future, but many of the climate modellers I spoke to were keen to point out that simulating the climate with more complex models may well lead to greater uncertainty about what the future holds.
Although I must confess that Canadian greener and longstanding IPCC - nik and Greenpeace movie star — and CBC's primary expert of choice — modeller Andrew Weaver's recent defamation / libel award of $ 50,000 by a labour expert suddently imbued with expertise ex nihilo on what strikes me as being an increasingly crowded libel front does not yield much hope of the optimistic (and / or democratic) kind.
«This response is well known, but what is less known is that the input of fresh water also leads to changes far away in the northern hemisphere, because it disrupts part of the global ocean circulation,» said Nick Golledge from Victoria University in Wellington, New Zealand, an ice - sheet modeller and co-author.
the summary above of temperature is following Carbon dioxide counts really depends how you see the graphical presentation that Al Gore was applauded for.From above his lines at his height cross-eyed and squinting, or standing on your head, wearing bi-focals doing a high five and losing your balance, right at the moment there is a peak in one of the lines.So what is the prospect that these earthquake scenarios raise or lower Whole of Earth temperatures or a greenhouse gas of unnamed type.After all someone above was going on about physics and what it really means... So can the same person be totally predictive or source a weather modeller to outline the whatevers..
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z