Not exact matches
What defines this line is the way in which all positions on it, from one end to the other, are committed to a form of
modern liberalism which, as we noted above, prioritizes the individual and the present.
Yet
liberalism as a political theory, understood as a cooperative enterprise for mutual advantage among free and equal persons, is considered by friend and foe alike the essential expression of
what it means to he a political animal in the
modern West.
They have to speak the gospel in ways that secularized
modern people can hear: «That's
what led me to imagination in the first place, and I still believe that one can be true to the task of theology without compromising the essentials as did theological
liberalism.»
As it happens, Hauerwas is much more diligent in being fair to individual liberals and
moderns than he is to «
liberalism» and «modernity,» which become handy labels for
what he most reviles.
Fosdick sensed this weakness in
liberalism when he declared in the 1930s: «
What Christ does to
modern culture is to challenge it.»
Neo-orthodoxy, rejecting
what it considered the facile optimism of 19th century
liberalism, accepted the finds of
modern science, but drew a distinction between the realms appropriate for scientific and theological study.
How we are to evaluate and challenge creatively the heirs of
modern liberalism depends on
what we take freedom to be, and not to be.
He was the father of
what became known as Protestant
Liberalism, which can be seen as the expression of Christian thought m a form more appropriate to the
modern world.
For one thing,
what we call «libertarianism» in USA today was originally called «classical
liberalism» - and AFAIK is still called that in Europe (don't tell any of the
modern liberals in America who get allergic reaction from a mention of Mises or Ayn Rand:) If you mean «
modern...
Lamb says the party needs to present a clear vision of
what liberalism means in the
modern age, arguing that during the election campaign it talked too much about
what it was not as opposed to
what it was.