Sentences with phrase «what most humans are»

Not exact matches

Through space exploration, most of what we do is look back at ourselves, and going to Mars will reveal more about what it means to be an earthling and a human.»

What it does: The role of this bacteria, which is most well - known for causing syphilis and Lyme disease, is still not well - understood in humans.

«The thing I love the most each year is coming up with what I call new «ancillary animals»» says Morris, who comes from a background in human - centric reality TV.

What it does: This bacteria is most notorious for causing severe illnesses such as tuberculosis, leprosy, and Hansen's disease, though most species of mycobacteria in nature are benign in humans, unless in cases of those who have weakened immune systems.

What it does: This is one of the most common microbes found on the human skin and nose.

People can tell you you're beautiful, smart, intelligent, the best, or they can tell you that you are the most horrible human being on earth — but what matters is what you think about yourself.

That led us to go deeper into the report — by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, an agency within the federal Department of Health and Human Services — to see what other states are near the top of the list for marijuana users, who leads in cocaine abuse, and which states» residents most abuse alcohol and other drugs.

The most important reason the test with James looks fake is that there isn't a human driver, which is pretty much what will happen with every Uber or Google (and sister company Waymo) test happening now.

Frankly, most industries, indeed most human activities, are harmful to the environment, so the question for the public is what are we willing to condone for our own comfort and well being.

What's most exciting about this, is that customers will still receive human - like service that recognizes emotion and can respond accordingly just like a person would.

Among the most dramatic are what you might call the 24 - 7 clock, the human touch, real - time feedback, and proactive pursuit.

But what is most important for your own growth is accepting the experiences you face as «the real, human person that you are.»

As Hudnell put it, «We have to keep our focus on [diversifying companies], otherwise we as human beings will revert back to what is the most convenient and what is easiest.

Most of us instinctively assume that technology relentlessly marches forward, but there have been times before now in human history — after the Egyptians built the Pyramids, for instance, or after the multiple advances of the Roman Empire — when the civilizations that followed could no longer do what had been done before, and perhaps there's a complacency and arrogance in assuming that this won't happen again.

Self - comparison can be a strong influence on human behavior, and because people tend to display the most positive aspects of their lives on social media, it is possible for an individual to believe that their own life compares negatively to what they see presented by others.

One of the most commonly cited concerns of automation is that it will lead to unemployment, but what if it robs us of human connectivity, too?

It would be nice for her dogma - immersed professor to eventually arrive at what his student came to know so early in her life, that knowledge is gained from living life, and that knowledge can be more true right now than the human writings on the topic that only go back at most 5,000 years.

Rather, I have always taken his question to suggest that only the most rigorous theological approach will be equal to the challenge of understanding what bas undoubtedly been the most complex interreligious relationship in human history.

Human nature being what it is, ample support could be found in either camp for the most negative interpretations.

What Keats meant by that, I am not sure; but, sadly, some of the most sublime works of human genius must of their nature remain unheard by all but a few.

I reallly want to know what it was that most christians have done that they feel that they must be saved by a human sacrifice.

Most Western Christians, especially fundamentalists, define what it means to be human by the Original Sin, not the Original Blessing — which is not only unbiblical, but puts the emphasis on the human rather than Divine action.

The theological issues are far from resolved; but, judging from what has happened in Bloomington, even conservative Christians (though traditionally among those most opposed to gay civil rights) are learning that theological concerns need not blind any of us to the needs and rights of homosexuals as human beings.

The current rate of burning fossil fuels adds about 2 ppm per year to the atmosphere, so that getting from the current level to 1000 ppm would take about 300 years — and 1000 ppm is still less than what most plants would prefer, and much less than either the nasa or the Navy limit for human beings.

Well, actually MOST of what humans posit are metaphor (myth).

A lot of people are looking to be told what to do... this is the state in which humans evolved and it is what most humans find comfortable.

What we need is a greater understanding of the environmental limits which most certainly exist regarding human intervention into nature.

In this way, by the most shocking of theological twists, we learn what God is truly like only after we have learned what a human is truly supposed to be.

It is unliveable at the level of society: hence, in Britain we have a government that lauds the freedom of the individual (and it should be noted in passing, but noted very well, that our present generation of politicians rarely talk of the «human person» or just of the «person», but usually of the «individual») but which has brought in some of the most draconian legislation in Europe designed to control what people say and do on certain issues so that society can proceed in its life as a unity and not just as a mere collection of individuals.

Most of it's national energies have not been spent on the issue of what a human being is, let alone WHO a person is, not to mention WHEN life begins.

Through your self - revealing and the power of your grace you simply compel what is most human in us to become at long last aware of itself.

I am trying to find out more of what we can do too, but since there is so much criminal activity involved in human trafficking, most of what can be done is reserved for law enforcement.

Let us admit this frankly, once and for all: what most discredits faith in progress in the eyes of men today, over and above its reticences and its helplessness in meeting the cry of the «last days of the human species», is the unfortunate tendency still shown by its adepts to distort into pitiful millenarianisms all that is most valid and most noble in our now permanently awakened expectation of the future appearance of some form of «ultra-humanity».

Those who thought of the Logos assuming humanity usually thought that what was most fundamental in Jesus was truly God and not human.

In her pioneering study of cosmologies of different peoples, she shows that the human body is our most accessible metaphor for figuring what we really suspect about our group's and the world's makeup.

As in even the most intimate of human relations there are facts for psychologists to discover and use towards man's self - understanding, so there is no limit to what may be found out about what happens in prayer.

For example, there has never been a time when the value of human life has been so highly regarded and when what are loosely called «human» values are the sole guiding principles for most people.

Here lies not only the most inexorable of all human responsibilities, but here as nowhere else men are revealed to themselves as what they are, tested and unmasked.

This is borne out too in that human motherhood (and pride in motherhood) is what most inspires reverence in men.

We live in an age whose chief moral value has been determined, by overwhelming consensus, to be the absolute liberty of personal volition, the power of each of us to choose what he or she believes, wants, needs, or must possess; our culturally most persuasive models of human freedom are unambiguously voluntarist and, in a rather debased and degraded way, Promethean; the will, we believe, is sovereign because unpremised, free because spontaneous, and this is the highest good.

But what if the most weak and innocent of humans have be die?

The one clear continuity is that «God is what is most worthy of the supreme devotion of all human living» (ITG 83).

We may go beyond the traditional theories of atonement and ask a radical question: «What account would be given of atonement if we were to interpret it from the standpoint of the most realistic analogies we know to human love when it deals with broken relationships and the consequent suffering?»

Rather, the primary issue at stake among the churches is a philosophical question what is the nature of human life and which philosophical concepts most adequately depict it?

This scripture is rarely used any more against homosexuality because it is understood by most to mean that the angels were leaving what was «natural» for them (i.e. their spiritual plain) to cohabit with humans.

When we talk about the key shifts of the twentieth century — those involving politics, trade, consumption, art — we leave out what is surely the most astonishing physical change in all of human history, one that has happened mostly during the last century: the doubling of the human life span in much....

I argued that the humanity of the Crucified Jesus as the foretaste and criterion of being truly human, would be a much better and more understandable and acceptable Christian contribution to common inter-religious-ideological search for world community because the movements of renaissance in most religions and rethinking in most secular ideologies were the results of the impact of what we know of the life and death of the historical person of Jesus or of human values from it.

What I have found most relevant is Colossians ch.3 in the light of which it is legitimate to speak of the gospel as the news of the New Man Jesus Christ («Put on the new self, the new humanity»); and more especially it is valid to present the new fellowship of mutual forgiveness created by the Divine Forgiveness in Christ and expressed in the Eucharist and the social koinonia of the church as the foretaste of true human community as the essential gospel («Forgiving one another as the Lord forgave you»).

What it means to be made in the image of God may become clearer if we take a look at our most distinctive traits — those that set us apart from the sub-human world and prompt us to speak of «the human soul» or «the human spirit.»

I am only absolutely sure of one thing, that there is not evidence what so ever to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you can be so sure of the most important events in human history.