While there have been many different usages, there has been a growing consensus in recent years among scholars as to
what mystical experience is and its varieties.
Not exact matches
(2) Argue from your own personal [
mystical]
experience, tell them
what «God» is really like (3) Confront all God talk: disempower both their and your own bullshit
What I
experience as I stand in face of — and in the very depths of — this world which your flesh has assimilated, this world which has become your flesh, my God, is not the absorption of the monist who yearns to be dissolved into the unity of things, nor the emotion felt by the pagan as he lies prostrate before a tangible divinity, nor yet the passive self - abandonment of the quietist tossed hither and thither at the mercy of
mystical impulsions.
The
mystical tradition, with which I have great sympathy and about which I have written in the companion volume
What can we Learn from Hinduism, unites believers beyond the differences of doctrines and ritual and stresses the longing to
experience the presence of God.
He emphasizes that contrary to
what people usually think, the great mystics absolutely do not confuse
mystical experience with visions.
What can be communicated are
mystical ideas, that is, intellectual formulations which mystics take to be appropriate to their
experience and as accurate as it is possible to be within the limits of the sensory - intellectual consciousness.
He has bound himself to his word, and though he is God anyways, always, everywhere, powerful, etc., we do not seek him in self - chosen places, or in
mystical experience or in
what I call self - masturbation worship
experience of whipping up emotions, or whatever else we come up with on our own.
He distinguishes between
what he calls a «
mystical idea» and «
mystical experience.»
The domain of religion has to do for the most part with other sorts of
experience such as the sense of being forsaken, forgiveness, caring for, having courage, sensing an at - one - ness with the universe and many others, including
what some call
mystical experience.
I hope I am right in thinking that you have enjoyed a direct
experience of God - an
experience of communion with the Central Spirit of Things and have known
what intensity of joy and exaltation of spirit that
mystical experience brings.
What is called apophatic theology says that we can only say what God is not — «Neti, Neti», «not this, not that», as the famous Hindu text puts it God, as mystical theology insists, can not be spoken of, but must be experien
What is called apophatic theology says that we can only say
what God is not — «Neti, Neti», «not this, not that», as the famous Hindu text puts it God, as mystical theology insists, can not be spoken of, but must be experien
what God is not — «Neti, Neti», «not this, not that», as the famous Hindu text puts it God, as
mystical theology insists, can not be spoken of, but must be
experienced.
But
what about the darker side of the artistic practice, one rooted into eerie
experiences of the artist that are not easily rationalized, dealing preferably with the
mystical entities and uncertain mental phenomena?