Sentences with phrase «what new society»

trooper believed he had a new constitution in his bags, I quite willingly classed myself among those who began by asking questions: asking what new society would be replacing the old; asking whether the new legal norms would ensure the same degree of peace, of liberty, and of prosperity as the old.

Not exact matches

That's what a new study published in the Journal of the Royal Society Interface suggests.

After successfully silencing the tug boats whose tooting tormented her on the porch of her Riverside Avenue mansion, Mrs. Julia Barnett Rice, the wife of venture capitalist Isaac Rice, founded the Society for the Suppression of Unnecessary Noise in New York in order to combat what she called «one of the greatest banes of city life.»

I would like to acknowledge what is a long list: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Small Business Administration (SBA), the Office of the New York Attorney General, the New York State Department of Financial Services, the New York Legal Assistance Group, Staten Island Legal Services, the Legal Aid Society, MFY Legal Services, various bar associations, New York City Department of Small Business Services, Center for New York City Neighborhoods, Neighborhood Housing Services of Staten Island and the Northfield Local Community Development Corporation.

St. Tikhon's mission of training a new intellectual cadre to bring Orthodox values into all areas of Russian society is very compelling, with parallels to what the U.S. Catholic Church hopes of Notre Dame or Catholic University of America.

What makes this novel a powerful description of the dawning new age is the fact that Jim can ward off the power of society to define him, and he does so not by way of a heroic loyalty to conscience (Rousseau, Emerson) or will to power (Nietzsche), but with the inchoate sense of the socially constructed contingency of society's imprisoning walls of honor and shame.

Don't you really mean below, cause if you are reading messages newest to oldest (like the rest of civilized society) you would not know what people are planning to say!

What can the politics of autonomy» which is the distillation of the politics of the Sixties» say in the face of the existential threats that will confront the next president of the United States and the next Congress: the threat of Jihadism (which has a very clear, and very different, idea of the good society), and the threat of a slow descent, via biotechnology, into the stunted humanity of the brave new world?

What we meant to model was the sending of one of our number to be a foreign missionary — to learn a new language, to understand a local culture, to sacrifice the amenities of affluence and to live knowing that he or she is always being watched by seekers — while the rest of us stay here as lifetime local missionaries, learning to speak the language of the unchurched, understanding secular culture, sacrificing the amenities of affluence and living as a «watched» person in a society that is skeptical of Christian spirituality until it sees the real thing on display.

My assessment is that the wider disorientation of Western society, the decreasing respect for many institutions and the disdain for humans alongside what Christopher Lasch has termed a «culture of narcissism» has played out both among the «spiritual but not religious» identifiers as well as among many «new atheists.»

Vigilante continues: «Philistines, bullies, prudes, and fops; the New Agers, the new racists, the new Puritans, and the new class all but strangle us with their new rules on what we can say and think in polite society.&raqNew Agers, the new racists, the new Puritans, and the new class all but strangle us with their new rules on what we can say and think in polite society.&raqnew racists, the new Puritans, and the new class all but strangle us with their new rules on what we can say and think in polite society.&raqnew Puritans, and the new class all but strangle us with their new rules on what we can say and think in polite society.&raqnew class all but strangle us with their new rules on what we can say and think in polite society.&raqnew rules on what we can say and think in polite society.»

What is required, writes poverty scholar Christopher Jencks, is a new moral contract between the dependent poor and the rest of society which recognizes both the need for the poor to assume responsibility for their behavior and the need for the nation to pursue policies that will address the situation of the poor.

We are beginning to feel the birth pangs of what could be a new form of human society — global society.

What matters is whether a Christian in the purity of his faith and his understanding of man joins the struggle and demonstrates by the audacity of his faith, by his love for his neighbour, and his optimism about the future, that he is not just the passive object of history or even of the new society, but rather the co-author and co-architect of the new order.9

Feudalism, it seems, is still with us; its new face is the landlordism that lets a few benefit from what belongs to society.

From what has been said thus far, it is obvious that the liberty of individuals to pursue private good is the major moral concern of the new reformers and for this reason their ethical views can fairly be seen as a variety of the contractarian social ethic now increasingly characteristic of political society.

What we want is the nonword, the unword, the silence, the touch, the dance, the music — in short, a new word and a new language that the mystic who rejects society's language eventually comes to utter.

We talked to Yancey about his new book Christians in politics and what it looks like to live in grace in a «post-Christian» society.

In What's Right with Islam: A New Vision for Muslims and the West (HarperCollins), he argues that the Qur» an and Islamic principles support the values of pluralism and free society.

This reappearance of the religious in the midst of secular society — and in forms far different from our traditional religious communions — raises as well, of course, a host of vital theological issues that can not be ignored: What is the relation of Christianity (or of Judaism) to these new and old religious communities?

This led Brague to the Biblical roots of the Western idea of freedom, where we can find something completely fresh — a basic, radical new idea that comes before all other talk of what it means to be free in our society.

This was my church experience, no matter what church I attended I was always counted on and called to do the work no one else wanted, because they new I wasn't afraid to «get my hands dirty» by ministry to those marginalized, disenfranchised, and stigmatized by the church and society.

And I feel it is the responsibility of us gay people not to want to have «marriage» because we feel we need this to be equal but to really imagine how a gay relationship can become a blessing not only to the partners but also to the greater society and define it as something new and leave marriage as what it is — a holy union between a man and a woman.

This world of ours is a new world, in which the unity of knowledge, the nature of human communities, the order of society, the order of ideas, the very notions of society and culture have changed and will not return to what they have been in the past.

American society has changed radically from what ist was a generation ago, and with that change have come new circumstances and challenges for churches, synagogues, mosques and other faith communities.

And that is true not only for so - called new Christians, but for many of us in our own allegedly Christian society who do not understand what Paul would have required us as Christians to understand.

The state rather than addressing itself to the creation of civil society, has become largely a mediator of ethnic political equation; whereas what we really need is a dynamic re-interpretation of the past, taking seriously into consideration, the new elements of change.

«This world of ours is a new world,» wrote Robert Oppenheimer in 1963, «in which the unity of knowledge, the nature of human communities, the order of society, the order of ideas, the very notions of society and culture have changed and will not return to what they have been in the past» (Saturday Review of Literature, June 29, 1963, p. 11).

If I want to waste four hours of my life being alternately patronized and reminded what an abject failure I am according to the criteria contemporary society holds dear, I can always read The New Yorker.

The only thing new is to try and understand what it means in today's society.

What's more, the relativist society in which we live ensures that there is an absolutism in this new sexual ethic, one in which there is very little tolerance for any dissenting voices.

To prevent me from speaking, they stomped their feet in cadence and loudly sang the National Anthem of the Sandinistas, while waving placards proclaiming their solidarity with Nicaragua, as if the new society being built in Nicaragua after the overthrow of Somoza was a concrete example of what liberation theologians were hoping to accomplish.

What The New York Times calls the «blame Woodstock» explanation for the rise of clerical sex abuse cases in the Seventies, despite the paper's evident scepticism, can not be entirely discounted, since as the researchers of the John Jay College (hereafter JJC) pointed out in their latest report, «the sexual abuse of minors is a pervasive problem in society and in organisations that involve close relationships between youth and adults... No exact measure exists for the number of youths who have contact with priests in the Catholic Church in a year... [but] despite the media focus on child sexual abuse by Catholic priests, it is clear that these abuse acts are a small percentage of all child sexual abuse incidents in the United States.»

The slogans, «protect water - protect life» and «protect bio-diversity» highlight what has to be done already now for the sake of a new society in the future.

What the ex-KGB hand, Putin, has gotten done is this: He's erected a kleptocratic quasi-dictatorship on top of a crumbling civil society while murdering his political opponents, invading his neighbors, backstopping Syria's murderous Bashar al - Assad, and conducting a fantastic propaganda campaign throughout the world (supported, sadly, by the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church)-- all of which is aimed at reversing the verdict of recent history, rebuilding Stalin's empire in a new guise, and deconstructing the West.

What is needed, therefore, is a new paradigm for understanding the relationship between media and society.

The Italian Socialist party gradually began to build up not only a network of institutions — labor unions, mutual aid societies, and cultural organizations — but a distinct subculture, what according to Arturo Carlo Jemolo might almost be called «a new religion.»

The leaders of what would become the New Age Movement confidently anticipated salutary effects from the breakdown of American society, which they called a «broken - back» technocracy.

But let's just think for a minute... what if everyone in our society followed the true teaching of the new testament about sex... there would be no unwanted babbies, no abortions, no STDs, no rapes...

The French Revolutionaries engaged in massive social experiment that invited a new kind of reflections about what kind of society is desirable.

With their thickshoulders (both played college football, Joe at New Mexico and Gavin atDivision III Trinity in San Antonio), hoarse, loud voices and a shared accentthat can not be traced back to any known people or society, they come acrosslike a couple of auto mechanics wiping their blackened hands on dirty rags asthey try to explain in plain English what they're doing to your car.

However, it's nothing new, historically, and presently there are examples of what society looks like without it.

(2) Their creativity, their energy, and their idealism are what remake society and carry us forward into the future with new ideas and solutions.

Your new little mammal doesn't care what meaning society has assigned to your breasts and, fortunately, neither do you.

She says new mothers have typically stayed home under a blanket, hidden from society: «I feel it's important for young girls to see mamas breastfeeding in public, so they grow up knowing it's normal, and what breasts are actually meant for.»

Recently, newer guidelines about both feeding and drinking (what cups to use) were released by Health Canada, The Canadian Paediatric Society, Dietitians of Canada and the Breastfeeding Committee of Canada.

There's no question that our society as a whole has to do a much better job of educating new parents about the benefits of breastfeeding and what to expect during the first few weeks of a baby's life.

What is often ignored by those who are opposed to bedsharing is that there is substantial evidence that children left in a crib in a room separate from their parents (the new «norm» in Western society) is associated with a large increased risk for SIDS, even when bedding and mattress and temperature are taken into account [5][6][7].

New labour actually say very little, would blue labour Newer labour or what ever do for people at the very bottom, OK lets just say the rejects of society, in the past social housing was the life blood for these people Income support and social housing.

«It's just a habit that we have made unacceptable through society and this is now starting to encouraging new users and it's the opposite of what's good for the public health,» said Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal, a Democrat from Manhattan.