No matter
what that number you choose, it's pivotal to have frank and honest discussions.
According to Hsieh, whose company values include fun and a little weirdness, it's not really important
what number you choose, unless it's at the extreme end, such as one or ten.
Not exact matches
There are a
number of platforms to
choose from, giving organizations options of
what will best serve their employees and customers.
It's quick and easy to add a tag when we're replying to a customer, and seeing the
number of requests per tag makes it easier to
choose what to work on next without being overwhelmed by the vocal minority.
«People need to be involved early on and well aware of
what's happening,» Hayes notes, adding that the
number one reason employees don't use a new system is that they weren't involved in
choosing it.
Actual costs that may have been incurred if we had been a standalone company would depend on a
number of factors, including the
chosen organizational structure,
what functions were outsourced or performed by employees and strategic decisions made in areas such as information technology and infrastructure.
«These shared values are
what prompted us to
choose Vestwell as our partner in delivering an end - to - end digital 401 (k) experience built around the Risk
Number.»
For example, you can
choose the
number of years in your loan (i.e. term); you can
choose the nature of your interest rate (i.e. fixed - rate or adjustable - rate); and, you can even
choose what you pay in mortgage closing costs.
In his charming memoir, Frederic Warburg says that the prominent Jewish community in Berlin appeared to be split down the middle between those hundreds of thousands of Jews who elected to stay and seek a restoration of judicial norms for both the Jews and citizens in general and the equally large
numbers of Jews who
chose the hard road of migration and a loss of
what seemed to be personal security as well as homes and possessions.
now I liken this passage to
what God said concerning the priest in the book of
Numbers 18th chapter he said that their inheritance was of the tithes of the children of Israel and so too me its right on point as too those who are
chosen by God whether Pastor, Evangelist or Apostle etc..
Since we don't know
what happens after death, any
number of things could happen, but my main point is that the idea that god gave us free will to
choose is an illusion.
It's all pick - and -
choose what you like, That's why there are so many Christian hypocrites who
choose passages to put gays down and ignor the MUCH GREATER
number of fellow Christian hypocrites who are divorced and remarried ADULTERERS.
When the church is consumed and possessed by mortgages, capital campaigns, membership
numbers, qualifications for membership or deacon or elder, the variety and format of financial reports, redecorating, ordination policies, the proper delineation of committee responsibilities, the aggregation and strengthening and protection of church hierarchical authority, the preference for political associations and prominence instead of being a voice and influence for justice and compassion, seasonal vestment colors, the abandonment and refusal to acknowledge congregations who dare to be excited by their proclaiming and provoking and living and sharing the Good News, the continual
choosing and preoccupation with better organization over better outreach, or
what styles of worship are to be offered — then it is time for an earth - shaking, stone - rolling, curtain ripping, hurricane - strength, fiery and noisy transformational revolution that will resurrect the Good News in the body and spirit of communities and individuals.
At most, you might deem it well to keep a few
chosen specimens alive to represent an interesting and peculiar variety of humanity; but as for the rest,
what comes in such surpassing
numbers, and
what you can only imagine in this abstract summary collective manner, must be something of which the units, you are sure, can have no individual preciousness.
What will this do to the
number of followers of Christ who will
choose to give not just their money but their lives to the needs of the world?
However learning from this experience I realized it was more about
what a person
chooses to serve than it was about the
number of people that attend.
BUT here's
what you need to do:
choose a recipe book from your shelf at random (either close your eyes, use a random
number generator, ask your nearest and dearest to pick a
number, it's up to you) and then turn to the index at the back.
and if that's his pay off, why get mad and drag it out because a couple of «smarks» are going to call it predictable... guess
what, there are a finite
number of logic outcomes to any given story... there will always be somebody who will say «Totally predictable» regardless of which option you
choose for the finish
In the last seven games starting with Feb 9th vs. Orlando (I
chose this because the game before it was the last time that Dario would ever play fewer minutes than Ersan), here is
what his
numbers look like:
* This
number might be way higher then
what they really pay at the Mucky Duck, but I
choose to beleve it because it makes this paragraph sound way more enticing.
It is not clear
what number Griezmann is alleged to have
chosen at United, but the
number 7 seems a natural fit for a forward of his style, and it is currently available.
It's obvious for me that arsenal need 4 players to become a world class team like bayern and real madrid i couldn't dare mention barcelona because they have unbelievable front three and they maybe the best attack in history of football we are lacking quality in the ST as well as the RW of course giroud and campvell are very good players but in my opinion they are less in quality than the rest of the team so we need to improve the quality in these positins About the DM it's a
number issue and i think the position is covered with flamini doing good job and elneny coming which can be deployed there About the fourth signing we need is a center back I don't think i saw till now enough minutes for gabriel to tell if he can make the position his own or not But
what makes me doubt him that wenger didn't
choose him till now over per which means he is not miles ahead of him so i think we need a new better CB This team can go and fight for every thing even the champions leafue....
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering
what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to
choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the
numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Teams are unsure of just who is going where or
what kind of players they'll even have to
choose from when their
number comes up.
But, however you
choose come at it all,
what those
numbers add up to seems increasingly clear: Mohamed Salah is having one of the all - time great goal - scoring seasons in the modern game and is putting up the kind of
numbers that set him out as a player who is, right now, one of the game's top three attackers.
Paulo Dybala talked about where he prefers to play on the field, why he
chose Juventus and
what number he will wear in his first season in bianconero.
Look
what happened when he used his phone to explain why Brendon Hartley had
chosen to race with the
number 28.
The
number of times that I heard I was spoiling my son or was asked when would we wean,
what daycare were we
choosing, did he sleep through the night yet and so on was immense.
In my opinion
what has happened in this area is that a kind of social ideology is now embedded within the medical paradigm, to the extent that that social judgments are masquerading as scientific judgments making the science a pseudo science, as a relatively small
number of people have been placed in a position wherein they can
choose what relevant lines of evidence (and
what counter arguments) are acceptable and which are not, as deemed by themselves.
But that's
what a small and growing
number of women are
choosing to do.
However, the most valuable point to focus on, is that no matter
what you call it or how you
choose to sleep, the baby's safety should always be your
number one priority.
The researcher focused on the lower score and asked the woman why she did not
choose a higher
number and
what she thought it would take to increase the
number.
Consider only the following questions, each answer to which is politically freighted: (1)
What would be an optimal
number of delegates and, almost certainly more importantly, how would they be
chosen?
Such repeated imagery shows how gender — i.e. women — is now a salient representational criterion in
choosing Cabinets; descriptively in terms of the
numbers of women; and symbolically, for
what it «says» about the Prime Minister, the Government, and the party of government.
So
what do these population figures mean in terms of which constituencies may, or may not, be likely to have their election boundaries changed following on the upcoming Consituency Commission report, especially given that this body effectively will have eight different options in terms of total Dail seat
numbers to
choose from?
But
what surprised researchers was the difference those rankings made: Biased search results increased the
number of undecided voters
choosing the favored candidate by 48 % compared with a control group that saw an equal mix of both candidates throughout the list.
«
What an individual
chooses to do in such a situation depends on a
number of factors including the relationship between interactants, their ages, safety in the environment, and intrinsic empathic capacities,» said Christianson.
What are the eight smallest
numbers that will work if three stones are
chosen?
In the most inclusive study to date on friendship, Chapman University research looks at gender, age, and sexual orientation differences in the
number of friends people rely on for support, to
what extent they
choose friends of the same gender, and overall life satisfaction.
Blood sugar levels vacillate widely depending on a
number of factors such as
what someone
chooses to eat and whether they exercise.
When it comes to supplements, you might having trouble
choosing what's most adequate for your goals, given the great
number of choices with different price ranges we have today, but the best idea is to stick with those supported by science in terms of efficacy and safety.
The way most of us approach it is to
choose a
number based on
what we used to weigh or, perhaps,
what we've always wanted to weigh, but is that a realistic goal?
To make up for dietary shortfalls, a growing
number of people are taking dietary supplements in hopes of getting in pill form
what their diet lacks — and they have a lot to
choose from.
Now the
number has grown, and more brands are
choosing to make the switch and go vegan and cruelty - free and making a conscious choice about
what they put in their products and not testing on animals of any kind.
The thing is, eating well makes me feel great regardless of the
number on the scale or
what I look like or
what I
choose to put on my plate.
What's more,» women can be picky when
choosing a partner, for a
number of biological and sociological reasons, so they often have the upper hand at this stage in a relationship.
After all, if you want to start a new relationship it makes sense to go where the singles are and - for an ever - increasing
number of New Zealanders - that place is online.1
What's more, if you
choose a serious dating site, the people you meet won't just be single - they'll also be the kind of relationship - minded folks you actually want to be dating.
You need to careful about the selection of
numbers of things which are coming in the your dating journey, like site is you are preferring,
what type of membership
choosing for meet easy going teen dating girls and
what types of conversation with your partner.
Researchers asked 88 participants
what they thought was the ideal
number of potential mates to
choose from (range of 1 - 5,000).
If you think you can meet their need and offer
what they desire for, you can
choose a platform to meet a great
number of sugar daddies who want to financially support to exchange your companionship and your beauty.