Goddard's computer models, with input from ocean buoys, atmospheric models, satellite data and other sources, can also simulate
what ocean water temperatures could do in the coming months.
Not exact matches
So if cyanobacteria are shaping the
temperature of their growing patch of the
ocean to favor themselves over cold -
water critters, researchers want to know how they are doing it and
what to expect next, says climate scientist Sebastian Sonntag of the University of Hamburg in Germany.
Think of
what would happen if you could pump cold deep
water up to the surface, increasing the air / sea
temperature gradient and warming the
water; that would give you an anomalously large
ocean heat uptake.
For hurricanes, then, you'd want to ask
what the sea surface
temperature, subsurface
ocean heat content, and atmospheric
water vapor content would have been if, say, fossil fuel use had been eliminated 100 years ago, and atmospheric CO2 remained at about 300 ppm.
Also at New York Times (though
what to make of «scientists said the ice sheet was not melting because of warmer air
temperatures, but rather because of the relatively warm
water, which is naturally occurring, from the
ocean depths»...?)
That said,
what do you find inadequate about the current hypothesis that CO2 rose in response to warming because its soluability in
water (
oceans) is lower at higher
temperatures?
Not sure
what you are saying, but yes the
ocean is the
water vapor reservoir and its
temperature is largely responsible for how much H2O feedback we get.
What it would take is another big El Nino event (analogous to 1998) that turns over the
ocean waters somewhat, followed by another lull, but at a higher
temperature.
The Pacific, and
what happens in local
waters in its east and west is the focus of ENSO studies and these phenomena are commonly compared to the march in global
temperatures but its
what happens in the global
ocean that is really important for
temperature gain and loss on a global basis.
This makes it clear to
what extent the variability in the inflow of «warm and salty» North Atlantic
water at times of positive values of the NAO (North Atlantic Oscillation) dominates the
temperature of the Atlantic
water mass by importing «vast quantities of heat» into the Arctic
Ocean to induce core
temperatures in the intermediate layer in Nansen Basin that are much warmer than in the Canadian Basin, far downstream.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/09/why-greenhouse-gases-heat-the-
ocean/ If you look at the data in Figure 2 of the RealClimate post (and ignore their discussion),
what happens to the DIFFERENCE between the
temperature of the
ocean skin and
water immediately below?
If you look at the data in Figure 2 of the RealClimate post (and ignore their discussion),
what happens to the DIFFERENCE between the
temperature of the
ocean skin and
water immediately below?
The entire atmosphere including the non GHGs and the liquid
water in the
oceans contribute to the surface
temperature being
what it is.
Warming
temperatures boost sea levels in two ways: melting glaciers release more
water into the
ocean (see
What's behind the big polar meltdown?)