Sentences with phrase «what omniscience»

«PLEASE PRAY FOR OUR NATION» This is because the god (s) are not paying attention and must be begged to know, (well remember) what their omniscience already knows, and to do what their omniscience already knows they will be doing.

It would be a free will choice, it's just that the omniscient one already knows, that's what omniscience is.

Not exact matches

As far as omniscience being incompatible with omnipotence, I'm not really clear on what your argument was there.

@Laughing: If you read the Genesis story, it does not strike one as a story of a meticulous Designer who used some form of omniscience to look into the future and predict what was going to happen.

Gods omniscience allows Him to know what we will do by the exercise of our own free will.

29 Concomitantly, God's omniscience is not subject to alteration by what occurs in time: «God's knowledge, as omnipotent knowledge, is complete in its range, the one unique and all - embracing knowledge.»

What happened to omniscience, infallibility, omnipotence...?

@Juanita I would then argue free will and the incompatibility of it with omniscience to show you that your god planned for all of it and that what you do was already decided.

I just hope and pray that you share the same conviction of the omniscience of God that I do and what the Bible teaches.

From Sonja: So if I'm understanding open theism right, it sounds like it's similar to — if not the same as — the idea that «omniscience» in God doesn't mean «knows exactly what will happen» but instead means «knows every single permutation of what could happen.»

But God, who is love, who is «the fellow - sufferer who understands», and whose wisdom penetrates all that is actual and is aware of the relevant possibilities (but as possibilities, not in whatever may be made actual among them, for that is «open» until it happens and God's omniscience can not mean that He knows, hence must determine, what will occur before it occurs), can make an appraisal that is both accurate and merciful — that is «just» and loving.

Only in the latter sense is it true that the categories are «beyond all decision,» for it is indeed impossible for God ever to choose whether to sustain or revise what will always have been the parameters of possibility; as Hartshorne has noted, for God even to attempt or want to attempt to revise those parameters would imply some divine confusion incompatible with omniscience (LLF).

So much for God's judgment and omniscience of what was to come.»

Just as the divine omnipotence and omniscience can not be realized existentially apart from his word uttered with reference to a particular moment and heard in that moment, so this Word is what it is only in the moment in reference to which it is uttered.

What's in view here, however, is not really the divine attribute of omniscience, but the experiential knowledge gained by Jesus as he lived, died and was resurrected.

What wouldn't survive would be the egotistical self - appraisals of near omniscience and great moral superiority.