Sentences with phrase «what opponents of»

A new report by the Cornell University Global Labor Institute echoes what opponents of the Keystone XL pipeline have been saying on jobs and energy security: The jobs claims are overstated and the energy security arguments in support of it are, more or less, bunk.

A new report by the Cornell University Global Labor Institute echoes what opponents of the Keystone XL pipeline have been saying on jobs and energy security: The jobs claims are overstated and the energy security arguments

What all opponents of industrial wind turbines in Maine wilderness areas come to realize is that idealism is not a very practical tool in this fight.

It sounds good, but it is not what opponents of this initiative are doing.

A lack of resources and capacity is exactly what opponents of school takeover argued — to which the reform crowd replied, «No excuses; Schools must be held accountable.»

What Opponents of School Choice Say: School choice hurts the students «left behind» in public schools.

What Opponents of School Choice Say: Yeah... well... this report just cherry picks studies to show what school choice advocates want to show.

What Opponents of School Choice Say: School choice «siphons» money from public schools at the expense of kids and taxpayers.

Turner says Gillibrand is associated with «high taxes, high deficits» and what opponents of the health care act call «Obamacare».

Not exact matches

He knows that if his opponents don't take him seriously, all sorts of great things can happen: they may not prepare as well for debates, work as hard to win certain states or pay attention to what they're saying as carefully as they should.

What's interesting is that on May 18, after his Republican opponents had all dropped out of the race, Trump and the RNC announced a joint fundraising deal.

Not only did President Trump defeat sixteen skilled and experienced primary opponents and win the presidency; he did so spending a fraction of what his opponent spent in the general election.

Horton suggests planting a set of words into a sentence, without giving your «opponent» a sense of being told what to do.

The one advantage of having never played the game before is your opponents can't know what to expect.

And, of course, you want to give special attention to sussing out what your opponent really wants.

«I think what's happened in the past is that the opponents (of trade) filled a vacuum and were very loud in their opposition,» MacNaughton said in an interview.

Facebook is becoming our main news source, and it's serving us up a steady diet of exactly what we already believe, and what will make us angriest at our political opponents.

«You should measure yourself in the spirit of improving upon your last best record, not what an opponent has accomplished.

But gun control advocates doubt that Trump really means what he says, after he ran for office warning that his opponent, Hillary Clinton, would remove the constitutional right to bear arms and he rode into the White House with the firm backing of the NRA, which opposes most attempts at real change.

Story was a staunch opponent of President Andrew Jackson, of whom Trump is a professed fan, so it's not clear exactly what Mulvaney was going for in all of this.

QUEBEC — The Parti Quebecois government tabled what it calls a «responsible» budget Thursday aimed at erasing doubts over the party's economic record and blunting opponent attacks ahead of an expected spring election.

In other words, what this statistic shows is that Bill 6 was desperately needed, and that the Enhanced Protection for Farm and Ranch Workers Act courageously passed by the Alberta Legislature on Dec. 10, 2015, by the government of Premier Rachel Notley in the face of huge — and when it came to its political opponents, hugely dishonest — opposition was the right thing to do.

But what is the reason for those who propose to ditch the conjugal understanding of marriage and replace it with a conception of marriage as sexual - romantic domestic partnership (what one opponent of the conjugal conception describes as your relationship «with your Number One Person»)?

, in the name of your creator, who created man from a clot...», [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FUTtKFH-KU] so rather than quoting what the terrorists quote (who BTW are misleading muslims and opponents alike, by reading verses out of context), use your logic, use your intelligence, read and understand.

The religious right experienced what CNN called a «nightmare scenario:» in three states voters approved same - sex marriage; anti-abortion candidates were defeated in red states; and Obama, whose opponent had the support of Billy Graham, won a second term.

There's a lot of gross misinformation, and outright propaganda put out there by creationists aimed at just reassuring the opponents, who they count on to take what they say on face value.

Actually, my favorite of hers, which unfortunately I can no longer find the link to, was something about the argument tactics of conservatives: That we like to overwhelm our opponents with... what was it?

But then, of course, the seminary's opponents would use similar reasoning to suggest that the church's public teaching must regard the Jonah story as a straightforward historical account, and soon no distinction at all would be possible between what the Bible records and what it teaches, what is central to the faith and what is not.

Tim, you're using the age old conservative tactic, on page # 1 of the Republican playbook, of accusing your opponent of doing exactly what YOU»RE doing... of saying your opponent behaves exactly the way YOU behave... and for claiming your opponent is exactly what YOU are.

Sort of like what dictators do with political opponents.

I don't understand why there is so much discussion regarding the Bible and what Obama believes or doesn't believe, there is no mention of his opponent's complete disregard of the King James Bible.

What will those nasty, unscrupulous opponents of «social reform» think of next?

It is now seen that Nestorius never taught what he was accused of teaching by his opponents.

George N. Boyd argues against the traditional position of the opponents of capital punishment that no crime ever «deserves» the death penalty, and suggests that the debate is not over what murderers deserve, but rather about how society should express and defend its fundamental values.

Some of those rules are: never say anything positive about your own position because it can be attacked, but chip away at what appear to be the weaknesses in your opponent's position.

To avoid begging the question as to why the embryo deserves moral respect, the opponent to abortion usually resorts to something like what I have called the theory of strict identity based on a symmetrical theory of temporal relations.

eg: «science doesn't explain what happened before the big bang, so God is real, ergo he created everything 6,000 years ago» — Opponents of abiogenesis belong here too.

Jesus could have been blaspheming, his exorcisms could be collusion with evil forces, and what his opponents, no doubt, regarded as the indiscriminate nature of both the forgiveness (including tax collectors and sinners) and the healings (Samaritan leper) could be an argument against these aspects of his ministry, but for faith both are a manifestation of the kingly activity of God.

Disagreements arose about what the Bible actually taught, until eventually, both sides of a doctrinal debate condemned and excommunicated their opponents.

But what do the opponents of capital punishment propose as an alternative?

The man who has no sense of history, is like a man who has no ears or eyes» - Adolf Hitler «When an opponent declares, «I will not come over to your side,» I calmly say, «Your child belongs to us already... What are you?

The Guardian: Opponents of gay marriage focus on tricky definition of consummation A legal definition of what constitutes consummation of gay marriage, or its breakdown through adultery, is proving so elusive that ministers may leave it up to judges to decide.

I am no opponent of academic freedom; but I believe Christians should not let civil libertarians and secular humanists decide for us what it means to be free.

Opponents of his ways in the WCC Central Committee could meet his scorn, or simply wonder what happened to them as he maneuvered parliamentarily or behind the scenes to thwart their schemes.

Readers and listeners are «insiders» to Mark's plot; they are informed very early of the divine identity of Jesus (and even told at times what Jesus and his opponents are thinking).

What happens if an opponent of the faith objects to this dogma claiming that it is a contradiction because, as he understands it, the dogma claims that three equals one and, as any first grade student of mathematics knows, three does not equal one, but three.

The «context of Scripture» became the primary determining factor in defining what the Bible is... The conservatives» reaction was also problematic in that it implicitly assumed what their opponents also assumed: the Bible, being the word of God, ought to be historically accurate in all its details (since God would not lie or make errors) and unique its own setting (since God's word is revealed, which implies a specific type of uniqueness)... Conservatives have tended to employ a strategy of selective engagement, embracing evidence that seems to support their assumptions... but retreating from evidence that seems to undercut these assumptions.»

Those who think an amended C - 14, with some regulatory tightening and some provision for religious or conscientious objection, is what even opponents of the bill should now aim at, as the lesser of evils, should think again.

Speaking of telling lies, a really good way to do this is to rephrase what your opponent says and then keep repeating the misquote in hopes that he or she will get bored and leave your lie as the last statement.

What the ex-KGB hand, Putin, has gotten done is this: He's erected a kleptocratic quasi-dictatorship on top of a crumbling civil society while murdering his political opponents, invading his neighbors, backstopping Syria's murderous Bashar al - Assad, and conducting a fantastic propaganda campaign throughout the world (supported, sadly, by the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church)-- all of which is aimed at reversing the verdict of recent history, rebuilding Stalin's empire in a new guise, and deconstructing the West.